BullBuchanan

It's all relative. On Jan 20th we can all start hating them together.

That's the tagline for the entire Trumpism movement.

Really? https://www.the-sun.com/news/1761227/election-violence-fears-proud-boys-stand-by-massachusettes/

The real fight is just beginning. On Jan 20th it's time to set sights on the Democratic party and the same corporate masters they serve at the expense of the rest of us.

Has anyone noticed how nice it's been over here lately? Who wouldv'e guessed that if all you did was take out the garbage, the house wouldn't smell so much like *****?

most of the country is slightly left to center, but then you have 65 million people on the rightmost extreme end of the spectrum who want Christian sharia law enforced by authoritarian rule and international imperialism.

Sorry, You lost me here. I'd lay him 10:1 on checkers.

This could have been an interesting wormhole to go down for a while, but the people propagating it were super lazy - go figure.

I looked into this further, just because. If you actually go to the github where this is posted you can pull down the data set. The problem here, honest or intentionally misleading, is that when Benford's law works best, it's on large naturally occurring numbers. The way US elections occur, when measuring precinct by precinct, is NOT based on naturally occuring numbers. It's quite the opposite. Precincts are tied to population. They MASSIVELY favor registration numbers between 700-900 with 0 precincts having a number in the 100s and only a small amount with 1000. This is from the 2018 primary data set. It's a hoax, and not a particularly elegant one once you stop looking at the graphs and start looking at the data. https://github.com/cjph8914/2020_benfords/blob/main/Chicago_Wards_Precincts_Benfords_Data.ipynb dataset: https://chicagoelections.gov/en/election-results-specifics.asp

Benford's law does not provide evidence of fraud. It provides evidence of statistical anomalies which can be indicators of fraud. Look up "is-a, has-a" relationships. When you cherry pick data sets, you're practicing numerology, not mathematics. This is how conspiracy theories are designed to work. A small part of something that's technically true, applied to an unstable data set, and then judged with extreme prejudice. Furthermore, the data does not even seem to suggest the possibility of fraud. When data is non-compliant with Benford's law, it appears evenly distributed. What's occurring here is that in a small sample size, of data of unknown validity, he has more 3's than 1's. Wow, big scandal.

Yea, it seems folks without a proper understanding of this mathematical principle are applying it to what they would like to be true.

Is this satire?

The same reason I pay for your home / child tax subsidies. It makes the economy stronger.

AZ isn't even the best example, because they elected blue senators. better examples are Maine and GA where Republican senators outpaced Trump. People that voted for Susan Collins voted for Joe "sniffyokids" Biden because Trump is that horrific of a human being.

We can just fastforward if you like. I don't want him to be president now, and neither do most of his voters. America didn't vote for Biden - they voted against Trump. It's all in the data.

so run on pro-life and christian-sharia law with mandatory church in schools and then turn around and mother ***** them.

Democrats: We should rig the election Also Democrats: Should we rig the Senate too? Democrats: Nahhh.

Worst economy in US history for the worst president in US History. I hope he enjoys Moscow winters. https://capaction.medium.com/president-trump-has-the-worst-economic-record-in-recorded-history-65f632376fef

yes.

I believe it's spelled, "brian".

This aged well.

Only in your own mind.