GoBills808

Just saying what, exactly?

Well I steal it because I am new school and hate football!

u mad

There's this thing called the internet

McDermott has always had a top tier CB in his defenses. They're not trading White

Weird

He plays the slot

I think Logan Ryan is crazy overrated. He is a decent DB in the slot and that's basically it imo I would take any vet in the Talib/Carr/Kirkpatrick variety before him, I think Logan Ryan as CB1 would be a disaster

Unfortunate If White played in the slot I might

if anyone says logan ryan i will lose my *****

People don't like Daboll because he does weird ***** at bad times and can't put a whole game together successfully. Which is a large reason we lost a chance last year at advancing to divisional round in AFC. THAT'S why people don't like Daboll. It has nothing to do with 'removing any chance of Josh failing'. To insinuate that there are people who dislike Daboll because they're more concerned with being right on Allen than the success of the team...that sounds like projecting if you ask me.

Ridiculous. Find one person who feels this way.

For sure and I don't discount it means we did well to be in short yardage situations. I was more commenting on how putting Lee Smith and some combination of Sweeny/Kroft/Knox on the field with Singletary and one of Gore/Dimarco is nowhere near as useful as Ingram/Edwards and Andrews/Hurst/Boyle.

For sure. I just wouldn't read much into a package that's used so infrequently. I mean we ran over a thousand offensive plays, this is run like 1.5% of the time. I hope this is used less going forward tbh. I don't think the Ravens offense is something we should or will try to emulate in any way.

Yes. Although he low key broke out last year around week 9

Might be to differentiate between weapons and fireworks/industrial chemicals etc

Yes that was my original point; out personnel being what it was last year, that package is basically always a run or some weird tackle eligible...basically only useful in very specific situations. Ravens with Ingram and Edwards plus Andrews/Hurst/Boyle were all threats so they can remain multiple out of jumbo sets, we were not able to be similarly diverse.

Goal line stuff on QB keeps is my guess Nothing to write home about imo

Your inability to support your own points is proof enough you aren’t arguing in good faith.

I know, of course. I doubt the guy I'm speaking to does, or if he does will endeavor to discount it.

Lamar Jackson is more dependent on his running production than Allen. As Bills fans, we have seen a Greg Roman offense that limits the route tree and relies on a high completion percentage. You as a Chiefs fan are probably unaware of the concepts. 61 passes is two games worth of throws. Yes, everyone knows about their respective completion percentages as they've been discussed to death.

An honest evaluation of whether an offense was based more in passing or running would of course use attempts and not completions.

I'm not going through all the snaps for the whole season but I would be pry shocked if we ran this particular 3TE set only one fewer time than the Ravens, who had probably the deepest TE rotation in the league with Andrews/Hurst/Boyle and they're all threats to catch the ball...between injuries to Kroft and limitations with Smith in nonblocking roles and specifically 23 groupings where Gore is redundant, this says to me we were either greatly limited by offensive personnel (which was def the case) and/or Daboll struggles to utilize what he did have to work with which I also believe to be true

Really loving people who still think they know more about defensive personnel than McDermott