Jump to content

Manther

Community Member
  • Posts

    4,106
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Manther

  1. Charles confused me and think it's a loss.
  2. IMO Woods is a great #3 because he can be a #2 when someone goes down. And, he still has upside.
  3. I know this wasn't addressed to me....but, I expected a NT and hoped for a LB to run Rex's D. I also thought we would have Gilmore OR Glenn locked up long term giving us s little more csp space. Still time for all that though!
  4. Sam Cowart Tweener and only one good College season. Recipe for disaster.
  5. I dont think we can or will trade for him. However, we don't know Kujo can play in the NFL. It seems we think Mills can be a backup swing Y and may be able for the starting job. Henderson might not be able to play on any given Sunday due to his health. We don't have a starting RT. We need at LEAST another potential starting RT to compete in camp and IMO I want that player to be the starter in a perfect world by winning the job.
  6. Me too! I like it!
  7. Very well said! Agreed. No pressure besides the odd game. And, we still slowed down the Giants enough to win, but, had a terrible offensive game. Apples to Oranges. Rings has nothing to do with it. What has transpired in both their careers in the last 5 years is relevant though. Yep! Agreed! It's like playing man to man coverage in hockey. You win 6 or 7 battles out of ten, that's good. So, 3 or 4 times a player is alone with the goalie. Thats not good. Not good odds for big, game changing plays. Bad coaching! That doesn't work and is bad coaching?! Bahahaaaha, Rex can out smart Phillips anyday. I mean, our coach is an ego maniac who loves media attention and thinks everyone isn't as smart as him!!! Oh and with his brother we are now twice as smart. Unstoppable!! Superbowl!! Seriously would not pee on Rex if he was on fire!
  8. How can we pull and sweep all game if we have two TEs streaking up the middle?
  9. Rob Ryan would help this team more if he played NT!
  10. Awesome, another blocking TE. Then the team will realize halfway thru the year we can just use 6 Olinemen. More gadgets and luxuries like Felton (in this day and age for a FB). kickoff specialist, and blocking TE. Is there really enough room in a formation for Felton and Dray and NOT have Sammy double covered? Jesus, is this the 70's? The NFL evolves and we think we can out smart them by going back into last century?! And, if a blocking TE can catch is the 10 passes (on the high end) a year enough to warrant a roster spot when a 6th Olinemen can block MUCH better? Serious questions and thoughts! If the failed experiment didn't work, try it again!? Comp picks shouldn't be a reason not to sign a FA, but, this FA it strongly should have been considered! WHY!?
  11. Yep Slightly agree. Maybe they just failed at resigning Glenn and Gilmore. Gilmore is going to be tough. At first glance.....meh. I think they have signed name players on their downside.
  12. I agree if we can get something for Kyle AND agree we need a NT since Rex is still here.
  13. Sure. And. They can resign or TAG him too.
  14. Signing potential depth makes you think about trading up in the draft and sending a productive rookie out of town? Playing Maddon?
  15. Well played
  16. Totally agree!!! I am confused by both those moves. I get Hogan. But, I don't get Charles at all.
  17. Ohhhmergad, that seems like a lot for a STer. IMO he can't play anything but STs maybe some nickel. Good for him though! Agree on everything
  18. I agree with your list. But, unsure on Harvin since his contract voided. IMO the Bills will sign 2-4 players in FA in the 2nd and 3rd wave of FA. So, we won't get a comp pick. Just some guesses and rough math.
  19. Agreed. Maybe even a higher pick. Or in the 1st if they think he can play LT in the future and RT for now. But, to your original point, very glad to have 4 starters back!!
  20. Oh my! Not the bargain $5 M/year I thought he could have been had for.
×
×
  • Create New...