timekills17

Is there any way you can paste these things so they're not black text on a dark blue background?

To add insult to inury, if Gronk is suspended for a game or two, that makes it more likely the Pats lose those games. Which means the next game against the Bills will be important for the Pats for home field advantage. It's actually to the Bills benefit if Gronk isn't suspended. How Billsy is that?

Let psychedelic Jim Carrey show you how. P.S. I just tried this and I think I pulled a hammy. Not going to be able to go this Sunday,

Hipocrites: Do no harm, unless you don't like the person.

I heard the Dolphins are looking for some new fans.

Okay. Before you look in the mirror might want to review Brady's impact on that team. He became amazing, but his team carried him the first year. I'm not knocking Brady. What I'm saying is he wasn't brought in as a "savior." That's what happens when you bench the starter rather than getting traded for to injury. If you see my earlier reply, you'll see why I stand by my comments that the Pats weren't a bad team looking for a spark with Brady.

Brady's first three games with the Pats: 1 win, 2 losses. In their win against the Colts, Brady was 13-of-23 for 168 yards and no TDs. But the Pats won 44-13. Next game against Miami (loss) Brady went 12-of-24 for 86 yards. The problem with the Pats was they relied on Bledsoe to win every game. He had just signed a 10 YEAR EXTENSION that year. With Brady they realized they had to play as a team, and they were actually a good team.

Did you quote the wrong person? I just said I'm tired of hearing how 6th round Brady was a savior, so that implies other late round QBs can be, because usually they're put into a much worse starting position. I.E. you appear to be agreeing with me by saying quit with the "but, but, Brady" comments.

For the love of... The Pats were a GOOD team with Bledsoe that year. Brady wasn't in the picture until Bledsoe's injury. Their offense actually regressed initially after Brady was forced into a starting role BY INJURY. He wasn't brought in to save a struggling team. This retconning of Pat's history where Brady was the savior as a 6th round pick cracks me up. He got the opportunity to play OK on a good team and learned, got better, became arguably best ever. But no one expected him to even continue at Bledsoe's level. There was less pressure on him than Peterman. That's the problem with bringing in a rookie to "spark the team." Usually that implies the team ain't doing so great, so they're put into a difficult situation.

You realize Peterman is a whopping one inch taller than Tyrod. I agree with your comments about a faster release and Tyrod's lack of anticipation/reluctance to throw to an "NFL open" receiver, but it isn't going to be better with Peterman because of the height difference.

Mark my words, if Brady were traded to the Bills next season, the Brady Bills #12 jersey would eclipse even Kelly's jersey sales. Either from fans that would buy it because we finally had a worth successor, or to burn in effigy. Either way, I'd trade one of our first round picks IN A HEARTBEAT for him, and I'm as big a hater as any.

Gents, sorry for the error. Had some challenges with my script linking the video from GDrive to play. I've reloaded the last two years and they should all be working again.

I just want to make sure I understand how to react here. We're supposed to be pissed at the stupid Raider fans that were making an ass of themselves, but proud of the Bills fans that were taunting a kid and his dad. And this is what made you want to be a Bills fan. Not to be an "Internet Tough Guy" but if I saw either of these incidents I'd quietly talk to the offender, tell them they ought to take their kid to the car if they had one, and then whisper how they really ought to try taking a swing at me so I could kick their ass and still have them jailed.

Sounds good, thanks. Although most of the Reddit (Bills) videos posted afterward have been a copy of my video... I haven't found any that are streamed live that are consistent and/or decent quality. Beggars can't be choosers, however.

Speaking of, I'm going to need someone else to pick this up next season, because I'll be down range again and I'll want to see the games! Any takers, let me know. I'll still provide the website, but I'll need someone to do the recording and posting.

23 OCT 17 Edit: Had some technical challenges Monday evening; should be GTG now. Video (condensed game) is up at the normal location for viewing. Watch the ridiculousness of the last play again: https://www.timekills.org/bills-video/

I added the lower res versions if needed. (720p is default, but 480p and 360p are available once you start the video.) You can also change the speed of the video, slower or faster.

Enjoy. or don't. I don't care. *sniff* here you go: https://www.timekills.org/bills-video/

Yes - except that was Nintendo. The Sega cartridges weren't famous for needing to have the dust blown out of them.

2002 Bucs? Albeit perhaps a better offense and obviously too soon to even really compare defenses. Depends if Dareus starts being more Sapp-like again. Our Derrick Brooks - Alonzo?

Shaw - I really enjoyed your comments, and agree with your later comments on the special teams. Although it clearly shouldn't have gotten to that point, the commitment of the players to "do their job" (ugh) was key in stopping a disaster. Little things like that then ending in an INT shows people that there is a reason to never quit. Another example was TreDay's fumble return. The announcers, fans - me - all thought it was an INT. He didn't do the typical pick it up and run a few yards down field dealio. He sprinted to get it, slowed for half a second, then committed and took off. The Falcons were all caught thinking the play was over until it was too late. Perhaps the only comment I don't "billeive" is true is your # 7 (" Marcell Dareus. Better start showing up, or he’s going to be playing someplace else next season.") I still think he has too much dead money to be gone. And I'm not convinced his lack of plays is due to attitude. He was used when critical to stop plays, and I'm not sure the Bills coaching staff would put him in for key stops if they felt he was half-assing it. I think he's still hurt.

"I'm glad he knows. That's awesome." That got ruined when BB.com forums went down. To criticize Carr's actions seems foolish. Sure - maybe he has everyone fooled, but he certainly has them well fooled then with his down to earth and helpful demeanor. To criticize EJ's game on Sunday - wow. Backup gets multiple passes including TD passes that even the announcers were impressed with dropped. And then the fans that crucified QBs like Trent Edwards for not giving receivers a chance are slamming EJ for giving a premiere NFL receiver a chance to make a play. I suppose because he was double covered it was risky, but who know what other options he had besides giving up? And the pass was *right there* for Cooper to get.

A RB running forward of the line of scrimmage can't make a forward pass. If he tries, i.e. the ball leaves his hand moving toward the opponent's goal line through his efforts, it's a penalty. Behind the line it would be the same call as a QB, of course. The key is Item 1-1. "If, after intentional forward movement of his hand, contact by an opponent..." Ryan's hand was clearly not going forward when struck causing the ball dislodging. If his hand/arm had been hit while moving forward and the same floppy movement happened, it would have been covered by 1-1 and been incomplete. Because it occurred while his hand/arm was moving backward, it's a fumble. To claim he "regained" control afterward is a stretch, as I'm fairly certain he wouldn't pass a flopping ball in that direction if he had control. Sure - it happens without being hit sometimes. And that's because the QB didn't have good control of the ball. Only then it wasn't caused by an opponent while his hand was moving backward. .

Sunday Ticket MAX has Shortcuts games. GamePass has the full/condensed/home or away audio.