Jump to content

EmotionallyUnstable

Community Member
  • Posts

    10,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Fields

  • Location
    Clarence Center, NY

Recent Profile Visitors

8,782 profile views

EmotionallyUnstable's Achievements

All Pro

All Pro (7/8)

5.4k

Reputation

  1. You have to look past this season for that answer. 2026 DEs under contract are only Groot, Hoecht and Solomon (who personally I don’t think is a valid 3 down option). I am sure if you asked Beane he would mention that they’re trying to win a Super Bowl AND sustain success year after year. I agree it’s frustrating and disappointing given the results thus far. I am also curious if they expected Epiness to have as good of a year as he is having. Possibly they wanted to move him or Solomon, bringing the DE numbers to a more reasonable number. Bosas injury history could play into this, as well as the suspension. It’s 100% fair to question the investment, although idk how much more a 3rd round WR or S would be contributing at this point.
  2. It’s not usually a shot in the arm, but in the arse. If you asked me in August I’d have been more eager to see Hoecht in action. Given the state of the DT room, I think O gun has the bigger opportunity to be a regular contributor early on. It will be very hard to work all the current DEs into the rotation, will like 1 (Jackson) being inactive. Groot Bosa Epinessa Hoecht as your rotational guys, and Solomon in on specials.
  3. Okay here is your challenge rule explained; Rule 15, Section 2, article 2 “Once a review is initiated, all reviewable aspects of a play (Section 3) may be examined and are subject to change, even if not the specific reason for the challenge.” And why they announced it twice: Article 4. Each Ruling Reviewed Separately Any aspect of a ruling that is not changed will be considered a correct ruling for purposes of reviewing the play. https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-rulebook/#article-2-plays-involving-possession
  4. Well after that was overturned…done.
  5. I don’t understand how they can lose the initial challenge and then they review the spot and get their challenge back?
  6. Bucs seem teetering on the brink of no return. Down Evans, I am not sure they have the fire power to hang with the Lions O despite the fact that they are banged on D
  7. Fair question: I think a lot of people were most interested in the addition of Nielsen, specifically since he has a history of playing a more agressive style on D (man and blitz). I wonder if their plan has been hampered by the injuries and if we’ll see any change in scheme with the return of some guys like Hairston.
  8. Bucs moving into a Bear front and the lions just swing the ball to the back. Nice.
  9. I really wish they’d just let him play Sunday (they won’t). If for nothing else, it’d add another layer of excitement to the game.
  10. Finally…we can beat a team with a winning record!
  11. This is everything to me. It’s not only what has made us consistently competitive on the back of JA17, but also what’s held them back when they need someone to step up.
  12. Not arguing anything you wrote; but this is a bizarre clip to show as the authors support: The play where we lose our Center to injury and a backup enters, who between him and the LG don’t handle the twist the right way. The mesh might have actually been there had they not completely blown the protection. Again, not arguing the perspective but it just feels like a better example could have been shown.
×
×
  • Create New...