djp14150

I would hold onto Giodwin. Not cut him. He has trade value. He and Harvin in essence take the same role so given both players injury history they should be sable to cover fir each other.

I think buffalo has to go through and restructure a bunch of pkayer contract to give then space in 2016 to sign him yo a contract similar to Suh eith a very large 2nd year that hampers the dolphins.

The have a better shot at acquiring RG3.....

I think chandler is released now to make cap room but buffalo could still resign him. I'm unsure what his dead cap space is compared to the cap hit.

We had actually a really good defense that was 4-3 defense. It kept us in games the year before where buffalo was still in the game either lead, tied, or one score down when entering the 4th in something like 14 of the 16 games. The offense was so inept it fist us. Gailey should have kept the defense as us instead if give his buddy a job that set the defense back by trying yo switch irpt to a 3-4.

Lets be clear---this isnt seeking a dismissal of the entire suit but only the part that the NFL(the league, not the individual teams) is at fault. the suit still goes on if the NFL is removed from it.

The #Titans deal with Da’Norris Searcy is for 4 years, $24M with $10.5 guaranted by @UniSportsMgmt. Just a handful of starts before signing

He had numerous injuries which played a big role.... he also has the baseball skills to fall back on. In baseball you dont have the injury risk like in football.

Locker can opt to go to baseball. He got a contract from a team (cant recall which one) while at Univ of Washington he played class A for the team.

And can I have some??? Does anyone know what the reason is with so many trades of actual players-----this is unheard of. You occasionally see a player for player but these are usually secondary role players or draft picks that didnt fit and need a change of scenery

There actually are legitamate cap issues in new orleans---this was talked about sometime in the gfal looking at the questionable contract they signed Byrd too and a few other contracts. they may feel they need to gut and rebuild

Jeta didnt give up much because the contract was NOT guarenteed. What I remember reading at the time of the trade was it was very low risk because of this. All they had to pay him was what he was owed last year.

Why??????? This doesn't make sense. RBs are a dime a dozen Buffalo has depth at RB His cap hit is high.... This would make more sense if the goal was getting an OL player who could help.

Thus story is flaky at best.... Saying Becker would have been just as good on buffalo is questionable at best given the offense. Bechham benefited from the QB he had. Had Watkins had Eli he would have been velar cut top WR. In the pick chart...buffalo was going all in give Wilson's death a potential new owner. They wanted to keep draft picks in 2014, thus they had to give up more in 3015 given pick uncertainty. If you look at past trades to get to the top 5 you usually need to overpay. Than what the chart says.

Buffalo likely gets a MNF game hosting Dallas or New England Thursday night game could be New England/buffalo game I think buffalo at KC has an outside shot. Thus would be the 8th consecutive treason playing each other and if buffalo was to hire Reich or the Denver OC there would be another reason to air this game.

Didn't see a thread on it.... Home....Miami, jets, patriots, Pitt/CIN loser ( Pitt if tie), Dallas, giants, Indy, Houston Away.....Miami, jets, patriots, KC, Philadelphia, Washington, Tennessee, Jacksonville (at London)

I'm fine with it...giving up the 19th pick yo trade up is well worth it. It has happened before. One year buffalo and mismi were tied for last place, mismi swept thus hot a 3rd place opponent schedule but because of a weaker SoS they picked ahead of buffalo.

Updated Assume Baltimore loses given 3 score deficit Buffalo win 2 Cincinnati lose on Monday KC beat SD or they tie Either Cincinnati or Baltimore lose next Sunday Win/lose to DEN doesn't matter...CIN/PIT would be for division title. If Indy wins out there ould be a wild card rematch of Cincinnati and Pittsburgh In the NFC Atlanta Carolina winner take all next week Philadelphia only hope...Dallas lose 2 and they win next week. If Dallas wins Seattle gets in too. The scenario on seattle...they and Dallas both lose out...Philadelphia wins the division by winning, then Seattle loses tiebreaker to Dallas. Detroit Green Bay fir division.

I had them at 9 wins...my error. Which could be the case if SD wins this afternoon.

Buffalo went 4-0 against the NFC vs PIT going 2-2.. They lose tie breaker to Pittsburgh tied at 10 wins. They lose to KC ann SD due to head to head loses They lose to Baltimore at 10-6 due to common game record. PIT and BAL win out then PI.t has the tiebreaker of division record. If PIT went WL and BALwent LW thus tied for division record, then BAL has common games record tue breaker. IF BAL went WL then division record edge goes to PIT in tie breakers.

A Pittsburgh loss would have helped and a Cleveland win would have helped. Cleveland had some tiebreaker edges in sorting teams in the division where they could end up in 2nd thus buffalo benefiting. Had Pittsburgh lost then they could behave done a chain loses among teams that eliminated each other where PI.t beat beat KC, KC beat SD, and CIB beat PIT....then PITmax at 9 wins and KC max at 9 wins....both below buffalo. Which one????? Both BUF and BAL went 4-0 against NzfC so it goes to common games Common opponents are MIA, CLE, SD, and HOU Buffalo went WL, W, L,L for 2-3 BAL has best CLE and MIA and lost to SD for 2-1.. Last 2 are common games..they split it's 3-2 Under this scenario Pittsburgh win division, Baltimore wild card at 11-5 SD by beating KC is at 10 wins but buffalo lose H2H tiebreaker.

Assuming no ties...yes KC and SD both at 9 wins and play each other in week 17 thus 10 wins Baltimore wins they have 10 wins PZiT/CIN winner will have 10 wins or more So buffalo is ties with 2 other teams at 10 wins and they lose tiebreakers to all based in conferencecrecord, and other tuebreakers

Even if buffalo wins next week they could still be eliminated next week. What does buffalo need.... Win out gorge 10-6 and only one other wilcard team at 10 wins or better. They lose tiebreakers to all: SD lose today against DEN 9.5. CIN. DEN at PIT--- lose both 9 BAL at HOU cle-- lose at least one 9. PIT. KC. CIN---win both ( for division) 8. KC. At PIT. SD --- split 9. SD. At SF at KC--lose both If KC beats Pittsburgh....and Baltimore beats Houston....then buffalo is eliminated ( assuming no ties) before they snap the ball at OAK. Why? KC/SD winner is assured of 10 wins and Baltimore has 10 wins, and PIT/CIN winner is assured of 10 wins

I dont think we get compensated for him since we didnt draft him. We should get a comp pick for Byrd. We should have gotten one for Levitre

In the NFC its a little less complicated.... Even though SF lost today they do have head to head tie breaker advantages on Dallas and Philadelphia due to beating both. Dallas and Philadeklphia are alos hurt by having gone undefeated against the AFC which will hurt them on conference tiebreakers. If SF and DET were tied for a tie at 10-6 it could get into the deeper tiebreakers of strenght of victory and strength of schedule.If DEt beats CHI and ends up 10-6 they will have the tiebreaker based on common game record. If Detroit stays within one game of GB before week 17 rematch then that game would be for the division. Seattle at Arizona in week 16 also looks like it will be for the division. Based on H2H Dallas over Seattle Seattle over Philadelphia Arizona beat Dallas Arizona beat Philadelphia SF beat Dallas SF beat Philadelphia Seattle beat GB Arizona beat Detroit Green Bay beat Philadelphia