B-Man

.

.

It continues. . . . . . . . .

Because he is capable. . . . . . . . . . . . . while others are not. .

You were warned.

Donald Trump may be the right man at the right time to fight FIGHT FIGHT!! against the corrupt transnational blob working to establish their utopian (for them) vision, but J.D. Vance stands head and shoulders above everybody else in the race when it comes to thinking about and discussing how to restore the American Dream. https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/09/05/jd-vance-is-the-best-person-in-the-race-n3794098

Such a sign of desperation. Trump has the moderate approach to the Abortion policy, so Kamala has to lie. (to be echoed by the lemmings here)

So, your Goldman Sachs statement is just your opinion. . . . . . . . . . . .NO ONE here is surprised. .

Hunter "changes his mind" at the start of the trial today. After attempting several legal tricks which the judge saw through, he pled GUILTY to ALL 9 tax evasion charges. Makes you think doesn't it. .

Wouldn't it just be easier to confiscate the 390 million firearms in the U.S. ? That seems to be 'thoughts' of many on the Left. .

Gee, why didn't they ?

Hahahahahahaha.

A good poster would provide a link.

• Ax yourself a question (as Kamala Harris might put it): If you are an ambitious Democrat—say, Gavin Gruesom, Wretched Whitmer, Josh Shaprio, etc—do you really want Kamala Harris to win this election? If she does win, it would seem more likely than not that she’ll be the nominee again four years from now, which means that your next shot at running will be 2032. Today’s fair-haired Democrats like Newsom and Whitmer will be yesterday’s news by 2032. Much better for their own self-interest if she loses, and 2028 willbe an open seat race since Trump will be limited to one term I’ll bet they’d all fail a polygraph exam on this question. • Thesis: The worst thing that could happen to the Democratic Party would be a Kamala Harris presidency. You think Carter was bad for long-term Democratic prospects? A Harris loss should lead to a reckoning inside the Democratic Party as happened after their successive drubbings from 1980 through 1988. That reckoning required the party to moderate. (Recall that Biden was meant to be a “transitional” president, as was the case with Carter. Look how that was turning out before “Operation Kamala” was unleashed.) If Trump wins, it should provoke an intense civil war inside the Democratic Party. The progressives will claim that Kamala lost because she wasn’t progressive enough, while the party old guard will say it is long overdue for the party to suppress their progressive radicals. Not clear who might win this struggle, but I’m buying popcorn futures. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/09/contrary-speculations.php

The self-own was massive with this one! Forget the commie stuff, Walz knows how to buy donuts! Democrat Sen. Tina Smith confirmed Walz's donut purchasing acumen with this photograph: Oh, and one more thing: Whoops. https://twitchy.com/dougp/2024/09/05/whoops-dem-confirms-tim-walzs-love-of-donuts-with-a-pic-that-proves-hes-bad-for-small-business-n2400570

TRUE.

NEW: Hold on - Is Kamala Trying to Change Debate Rules AGAIN, Even As She's Struggling in Debate Prep By Nick Arama Kamala Harris has been ducking reporters and not answering questions. She gave one softball interview — but with the aid of her "emotional support governor," Tim Walz. But now the debate is quickly approaching on September 10. As we reported, they are now trying to argue that Harris is "fundamentally disadvantaged" by having the mics muted when she's not speaking. But that's the very point that Joe Biden asked for — former President Donald Trump didn't ask for that. So, once again, right out of the box, the Harris team is being dishonest about that. Harris was also the one insisting on how they had to keep to the rules/date agreed to for a debate with Joe Biden, so it's hilarious she now wants to get out of those rules. It also sounds like the Harris team is still trying to change the rules. They appear to be butting heads with ABC on what has been agreed to, even as they say there's an agreement. According to what was conveyed to POLITICO, Harris campaign official Brian Fallon claimed there were "verbal agreements" that were important to getting Harris to finally agree to proceed. CNN reported a similar story. https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/09/05/kamalas-debate-prep-is-having-some-problems-n2178940 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/harris-relents-on-muting-debate-microphones/ar-AA1q0A73 https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/04/politics/harris-trump-abc-debate-rules-microphones/index.html .