-
Posts
69,596 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by B-Man
-
That is NOT our ideology. We have posted our strong conservative beliefs for years. YOU are reacting to the liberal's faults being pointed out, with multiple repetitive, angry posts. That's a little "reminder" for you.
-
-
-
Getting to Know Kamala and Her Successes in Office
B-Man replied to JDHillFan's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Who'd a thunk it ? No One Is Above the Law? Planned Parenthood Violated Federal Law by Giving Kamala Campaign Workspace Huh. This writer supposes when you're a radical supporter of murdering unborn babies in the womb at all stages of pregnancy, pesky little things like following federal law seem positively quaint. But after years of the Left -- up to and including President Biden -- screamed at us that no one is above the law, the fact their darling Planned Parenthood broke federal law in providing workspace to the Kamala Harris campaign should result in an investigation and charges. Should. Will it? https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2025/01/14/planned-parenthood-gave-campaign-space-to-harris-in-violation-of-tax-law-n2406605 -
Multiple threads. Acting out can be a way to vent painful emotions like fear or frustration.
-
Pete Hegseth: The Josh Allen of Defense Secretaries
B-Man replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
. -
Inauguration Day - President Donald J Trump
B-Man replied to B-Man's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Didn't attend President Carter's funeral either, that was worse. She (?) is not a nice person. . -
Though I've belted you and flayed you, By the livin' Gawd that made you, You're a better man than I am, Pete Hegseth ! .
-
-
J.D. Vance - Character and Policies
B-Man replied to The Frankish Reich's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
Pete Hegseth: The Josh Allen of Defense Secretaries
B-Man replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Back to the thread. -
“WHY CAN’T SHE JUST TELL HOMELESS PEOPLE NOT TO BURN STUFF OR SMOKE CRACK?” You know why. Progressive Newspeak is the art of saying what everybody knows in a way that allows them to pretend that they don’t know it.
-
Pete Hegseth: The Josh Allen of Defense Secretaries
B-Man replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Defense secretary nominee Pete Hegseth’s FBI background check came back as “unremarkable,” according to a report on Monday, a day before he appears before the Senate for his confirmation hearing. His FBI file was delivered to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker (R-MI) and Ranking Member Jack Reed (D-RI) late last week. The outlet reported: Sens. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Jack Reed (D-R.I.) — the chair and ranking member, respectively — are the only committee members who have viewed Hegseth’s FBI file, which was delivered to the panel late last week. Republicans on SASC who have been briefed say that the report is unremarkable. In previous weeks, Democrats opposing his nomination had tried to insinuate that Hegseth’s background check by the FBI would be problematic for him. https://punchbowl.news/archive/11325-am/ -
Hey, the old "only give part of response trick" a liberal classic Here's some more "whatabout" for Tim Kaine. Yeah ... but that's (D)ifferent! Kaine then tried to bring up a discredited allegation of sexual assault by wrapping it in a hypothetical. Hegseth refused to play along, but Kaine would not let it go, even though Hegseth hadn't done anything non-consensual. In fact, Kaine kept pointing out that consent wasn't actually an issue, but wanted Hegseth to respond as if it were. And all of this took up Kaine's seven minutes of time, which was intended to discuss America's national security and military readiness. Clearly, Democrats don't take that seriously. They take character assassination more seriously. This is in many ways a replay of the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearing, only without anyone willing to lodge unsupported and vague allegations on the record against a nominee from a Republican president. If Democrats believe this will restore them to political relevance, they have some hard lessons coming. That's especially true for another embarrassing spectacle in this hearing -- which we'll cover in detail later today.