B-Man

ME! ME! ME!: Senator Mark Kelly Wants Us to Know His Recent Media Blitz Has Nothing to Do With Him Warren Squire https://twitchy.com/warren-squire/2025/12/04/mark-kelly-this-isnt-about-me-heres-video-of-me-talking-me-afain-n2422432 .

I thought that the LEFT was for choice ?

Damning. Here's the article: "'We’re All Just Winging It': What the Gender Doctors Say in Private In footage obtained exclusively by The Free Press, gender doctors acknowledge they perform life-altering procedures on vulnerable youth with no supportive evidence—and they are proud of it." Click for more » https://www.thefp.com/p/were-all-just-winging-it-what-the?r=4crwli

If the Minnesota fraud was so huge, why didn't government officials notice and take action? The question is asked on today's episode of the NYT podcast "The Daily." The answer is two-fold: 1. A group called Feeding Our Future accused the state of racism for "slow walking" their application. This wasn't long after the "national reckoning" that followed the death of George Floyd, and "at that time, nobody wanted to be called a racist, even it was wholly unfounded" and "that really had a paralyzing effect on people in state government who knew something funny was going on, but didn't really want to stick their necks out and stop it." 2. Money was cycling back to the Democratic Party. "Somali Americans have become politically quite powerful in the state... and... became important donors to their campaigns.... [S]ome democratic elected officials... worried that any action they took to question or intervene in a way that would maybe stop these schemes, could have alienated a really important constituency." Now, the podcasters clearly wish the fraud problem could be solved by Minnesota. But Trump has jumped at the opportunity to emphasize what reads as racial. He forthrightly — brutally — connected the fraud problem to immigration from the wrong places: Click for more » https://althouse.blogspot.com/2025/12/if-minnesota-fraud-was-so-huge-why.html#more

The January 6th pipe bomber terrorist was… - a young black guy - radical anti-Trump activist - sued Trump & ICE & DHS - extreme racial justice advocate - works at his family bail bonds company that frees criminal aliens from ICE custody Yeah, this explains exactly why the FBI & DOJ could not “find” this guy for 4 years. The Biden FBI had mountains of evidence against Brian Cole. Receipts, cell data, license plate, photos and videos of the crime. They knew exactly who did it! But Brian’s profile destroys their entire ‘MAGA white supremacist insurrection bomber’ narrative in one blow. The FBI didn’t “fail” to catch him. Leftists protected their own.

ANOTHER MEDIA INVENTION No direct quote. No evidence. No wrongdoing. Just partisan operatives feeding rumors to desperate reporters hunting for another scandal that doesn’t exist. Under his authority as commander in chief, the president can blow up pretty much anybody on Earth whom he deems a national security threat. He does not need permission from Congress, the media, or a panel of self-appointed commentators. The missile strikes on drug-running vessels operated by a designated terrorist group are lawful, routine, and predictable. What made the episode explosive was that it enraged exactly the faction that always reacts this way: the political left. Impeachment is the only real consequence available to the administration’s critics, and after two failed efforts, that prospect does not keep President Trump awake at night. Republican control of the House makes even a symbolic attempt unlikely. The central allegation is that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth issued an order to “kill everybody” on the vessel. The Post framed it this way: “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave a spoken directive, according to two people with direct knowledge of the operation. ‘The order was to kill everybody.’” The headline amplified the accusation: “Hegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all.” A “spoken directive” means no record. The quote is a paraphrase. Nothing indicates that the source actually heard the Hegseth say those words. This is an anonymous, secondhand characterization of an alleged statement — precisely the sort of raw material the Post loves to inflate into scandal. If these anonymous sources truly believed the secretary issued an illegal order, they were obligated to report it through the chain of command. Their silence speaks louder than any paraphrase. The most plausible explanation is that someone misunderstood — or deliberately distorted — an aggressive statement by Hegseth and nothing more. The United States targets terrorists. The implication behind the Post’s story is that survivors remained after the first strike and that either the secretary or JSOC ordered a second engagement to kill them. No evidence supports that claim. No one outside the direct participants knows what the surveillance picture showed or what tactical conditions existed immediately after the first blast. It is time to put a moratorium on the online laws-of-armed-conflict “experts” who materialize whenever a strike hits a target they sympathize with. They insist that the presence of wounded combatants instantly transforms a hostile platform into a protected site and that destroying the vessel itself becomes a war crime. Even the New York Times — no friend of the administration — punctured that claim: According to five U.S. officials … Mr. Hegseth’s directive did not specifically address what should happen if a first missile failed to accomplish all of those things … and his order was not a response to surveillance footage showing that at least two people on the boat survived the first blast. The mobs demanding Hegseth’s scalp will be disappointed. The voters who supported this administration expected firm action against terrorist cartels and open-ocean drug networks. Another hostile vessel was reduced to an oil slick, and most Americans see that as a success. https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/turns-out-that-hegseths-kill-them-all-line-was-another-media-invention https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/01/us/hegseth-drug-boat-strike-order-venezuela.html

The command, “Do not cast your pearls before swine,” is not about withholding truth out of arrogance or pride. Rather, it is a call for spiritual discernment. Pearls represent sacred, divine truths. Swine and dogs symbolize those who are violently or irreverently opposed to those truths. Sharing spiritual treasures with people who are intent on mocking or destroying them is not only unproductive—it may lead to harm. Jesus wants His followers to be wise. We are not to judge others hypocritically, but we are also not to foolishly give what is sacred to those who are determined to reject it. https://bibleask.org/meaning-of-do-not-cast-your-pearls-before-swine/

, Well sir, I do not feel obligated to answer your question, Because you just told me that actual (demonstrated) news was not legitimate to you. So why would I, or anyone for that matter, try and feed your 'curiosity' ??

A pro abortion book aimed at 5 to 8 year olds is for sale on Amazon It is pointed out that this is sick. Frankie's take is. . . . it's your fault for talking about it. Homelander level response.

No. It contains quotes and links to the quotes. Unless you just read opinion at the top and not the whole article ? .

Sign the Pentagon press rules, get access. Not hard.