fridge

I'm not looking forward to having drunk Bills fans tell me for the next 15 years that we should have just signed Chad Kelly.

Of course, but what does that have to do with what I was talking about?

What does any of that have to do with Tyrod sucking balls?

I'm saying Allen has like 10-15 more games left to turn it around, including the offseason. I used EJ's allotted timeframe as the example. What does "chuckie" have to do with anything?

No, I literally hated the playoffs. Flew in from LA and it was miserable. If we had a QB we probably win that game.

That's my point...

? You got very defensive just then. I didn't realize 32nd ranked passing offenses were average.

Holy crap is that hilarious. Somehow, despite all his failures, the national consensus is still that Taylor was some sort of franchise QB we tossed away.

I mean, yeah if we're just going to start the excuse train. I don't know why this is so difficult to understand. He started 5 games. He could have been good or bad. He was bad. It's alright, it's not over, he can definitely come back and be a great QB... but you understand that's less likely to happen than if he was good, right? The odds, the percentage, the chance that this happens...realistically speaking... is low. Like I said, it's not way too early, it's a little early to write the book on Allen. We gave EJ I believe 14 starts before we pulled the plug, so Allen is already more than a third of the way there.

Whaley and Dorsey have both failed this test. When given that condition, you decline the position. For Whaley, when he was told he could not hire his own coach and had to allow Rex Ryan to come in and dismantle his defense, he should have politely resigned, and cited a difference of opinion. You need a backbone to have success at such a difficult job like being an executive in the NFL. This is just as much on Dorsey and Whaley as it is the owners in these situations. Whaley doesn't strike me as a guy who put up for himself and Dorsey doesn't strike me as a particularly bright guy.

Can someone translate this for me? Hue Jackson is taking over offensive play calling duties? Is that what we're supposed to have feelings about here?

A moment of pure nostalgia as I reminisce about Russ Brandon threads. Alas, the more you change, the more you stay the same.

It's fun, but not when we go months in between touchdowns.

So no tacos then?

I think I understand where you're going. Let's make the button red with caution tape over it. While we're add it, let's require a simple math equation to deter new threads. I'm thinking 2+2 might get it done.

Are you joking? He had Stevie Johnson, Donald Jones and David Nelson. A 7th rounder and two undrafted FA's. Gailey was a bad coach, but his offensive scheming and ability to squeeze production out of no talent should never be questioned. 38% is lower than 62%, you know that right?

*Edit: OP originally had Mayer instead of maybe in the title. I'm not completely crazy. GIF is staying.

As a guy who thinks it's probably somewhere between 5 - 10%, I resent being associated with the 0% group. At least I'm factoring in the chance that every member of every roster except ours gets a nasty year-long bout of the measles and has to sit out the 2019 season.

They did this though. McVay inherited a similar team and look at the Rams in the same amount of time... There were other options for improving the team. This isn't a league mandated rebuild and we certainly didn't have to toss all our talented players to the curb.

You at least admit making the playoffs was one of the luckiest things ever and we were a Colts 2 point conversion flag away from having an incredibly similar season than like 6 of our last 7, right?

I voted Peterman, but who cares. Derek Anderson has me about as excited as I get on tax day. McBeane should be ashamed of what they've trotted out there on offense. I'm not even sure a team has ever had two worse QBs and we once entered a game with QB 1 Thad Lewis, QB 2 Jeff Tuel.

I agree whole heartedly to your second point. Whether or not he's worse is a toss up. They're both just about the last two quarterbacks I'd ever want to start.

Yeah! Derek Anderson came in off the street and totally outplayed him. ? Kirby, it turns out we're just terrible. Peterman a little more maybe than the others, but this is basically the darkest hour for our offense. It truly does not matter. We're dangerously close to, "hey, at least we have a team" territory.

I've never cared less in my life. I guess gun to my head I'd say Peterman, but only because it would be the greatest win of the last 20 years if we beat Brady with him. Odds of that happening are .5%, but the odds of Derek Anderson winning are 1% so whats the point?