Rob's House

None of those things are misogynistic. They're personal insults. Do you know what "misogynist" means? Do you think his daughter thinks he's a "misogynist"? If I call gatorman a dick bag am I a misandrist? If I call him a waste of skin an I a misanthrope? If some tard like gator said that **** I'd just make fun of him or call him an idiot, but you're not an idiot so it bothers me to see you saying stupid **** like that. Also, 90+% of the time you hear someone utter any derivation of the word "misogynist" you're listening to a !@#$ing blowhard. This Trump derangement syndrome has otherwise intelligent and sensible people acting and talking like the MSNBC starting line up with all this politically correct bull ****. Don't be one of those !@#$ing people.

I wasn't offended. But I was taken aback by the idiocy of someone willing to say something so mind-numbingly stupid out loud, much less in front of cameras. Calling it a negotiating tactic does not change the fact that it was a stupid one.

What misogynistic comments?

Another aspect to consider is that it's really wide open this year. There don't appear to be any truly elite teams in the AFC. NE, Pit, and Indy have questionable defenses, Manning may be running out of gas in Denver. Baltimore and Miami look solid, but neither has much in the way of weapons. I'm not predicting a Superbowl, but stranger things have happened. There's certainly no one I don't think we can hang with.

If we're being honest, TT is a pretty risky pick. I like it because I think his running ability will give us an edge, it's an exciting choice, he's from VT, and he actually won the spot with his performance, but I don't think you can ever consider going into the season with a 6th round pick who's never started an NFL game at QB as an ideal situation.

Yes

I decided before I posted the thread. Just after hearing the unexpected outpouring of concern from those around me I was curious what others thought about the matter.

That's not necessarily true. I know a guy who had it done at 16. He said it wasn't pleasant, but it worked. I'm sure with some lidocain it would be just fine.

A few tidbits I've come across that I'll share for the benefit of others: - The hygeine benefits are miniscule and can be remedied by applying soap and water at shower time. - The medical benefits are virtually non-existent in the first world. - The foreskin adds sensation for both parties. - I know of a few uncut guys who have had plenty of experience with women.

I don't have a problem with the list, but I think you could put those listed from 23-32 in any order without losing much credibility.

It makes plenty of sense. If he can stay healthy he could be the best player on the offense. Athletically, he's on a different level from Woods. Attitude/personality, migraines, and injuries are the questions with Harvin, ability is not.

Or more precisely, un!@#$able. After about the 6th month it's pretty difficult, unsatisfying, and, consequentially, rare enough as is. Then there's a minimum 6 week recovery period before you're going to see any hot action. I don't even have to focus at this point. I got direct deposit into the spank bank.

No, my parents went with the desert religion decision and clipped me in the cradle. It doesn't bother me for myself; I don't lay awake lamenting the loss of my foreskin. I just see it as a primitive, painful, traumatic, and unnecessary practice, born out of mythology, and perpetuated out of a fear of being different. I also figure, you can always cut it off, but you can never grow it back.

I agree with this. I like Bryce Brown and Karlos Williams, but I'd have rather sent one of them to the PS to develop for the future and kept FJ this year. If they got poached, so be it.

I hope my TE & Fitz homer posts were lost in a similar crash.

Thanks fellas. Does anyone else find her insanely !@#$able?

Rob's House Jr. recently crossed the finish line, instantly transforming from an inanimate mass of cells to a person, and many friends and family members are now very concerned with his penis, particularly the fact that I'm not considering genital mutilation. I figure if he ever decided that he's burdened by too much skin he can always decide to have it cut off - hell, I'll Even pay for it - but I thought I'd give him something I was not: a choice. A lot of people find this outrageous but can't or won't give a good answer as to why. I'm just curious what y'all think about this.

18-28 for 210 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT; 12 car for 110 yds, 2 TD, 1 FUM.

Tim Tebow is a starter, he just doesn't have a team.

I think he'll have some growing pains. Despite those growing pains I think he still gives us a better chance to win than Manuel. I also think (although it's just my belief and can't be proven) that Manuel is better now and has a better chance for long-term success because he got to ride the pine last year and because he was made to compete for his job.

Number of starts is the relevant stat. The number of years one has spent in the league is irrelevant.

I don't think the fan base is nearly as divided as when we were "all in" on a single player. And unless you're saying TT should be backing up Manuel, I don't see how we haven't benefited.

More like Ross Palmer-Manuel, if you catch my drift.

That argument always made me want to eat my own brain. The idea that you can't bring in a new guy to develop and evaluate without tossing your current project makes no sense to me. I'd say we did exactly that and it appears both benefited from it.

14 games? To evaluate a QB? That's like trying to get an ab workout in 6 minutes.