Utah John

CJ is a good person and was had a great year as a Bill. There's no reason to mock him or tear him down. He did have limitations as a RB in blocking and vision. If he still has speed and quickness he'd be an effective KR -- I still remember a Thursday night game where he ran a KO back. I don't know whether he'd be good at returning punts. He has the physical skills to be an effective slot receiver but probably not the ability to recognize coverages and make adjustments to get open. If his career is over, I wish him well. I also with the Bills had never drafted him since we didn't need him and we had so many other holes to fill, but it's never the player's fault if he's drafted higher than it turns out is justified.

The Bills and 49ers played a game a long time ago which was the first with no punts. The Pats-Saints game could be like that. I expect Brady to recall what Gronkowski looks like so even if Amendola doesn't play the Pats will still score a lot against the Saints defense. But Brees will destroy that horrible Pats D. When the Pats are so desperate they go out and pay that much to Gilmore, you know the glory days are over. Pats, 48-42. But the Saints have a decent shot if they can stop Gronkowski somehow.

What are the goals of a professional sports team? 1. Win the game. 2. Well, there isn't a 2. Maybe it's, don't show off capabilities you don't need to reveal, but only if you win to begin with. The Bills coaching staff put together a strategy that was sufficient to beat a crappy team. They won easily and could have outscored the Jets by more -- but why do that? Why use every trick in their bag to beat the Jets? It's much better to just win, and show future opponents as little else as possible. For the defense, the only threat was Forte and Powell. The Bills used their D line to eat up blockers and keep the blockers from reaching our LBs. I think that worked out perfectly. This approach won't work against good QBs but don't expect the Bills to use the same approach against good QBs. It's the coaches' job to figure out how to attack the other team. I didn't like the fact that Dareus got pushed back on the QB sneak. Other than that, he seemed to be doing exactly what he was told to do.

I lived in the East Bay for several years and of course hated both the Raiders and the 49ers, but a buddy (a Broncos fan) had a ticket and took me to the 49ers game where they had the Joe Montana retirement celebration, playing against Denver. It was a great event to have been at, but the stadium (Candlestick) was really bad. The slope of the stands was pretty flat so we were far from the field. The fans were just as obnoxious and vulgar, or more so, than even the drunks are at Bills games. Incredibly vulgar. It was a night game and it was COLD. It cost a fortune to park in a marsh. Candlestick was right on the Bay and at high tide the entire dirt parking lot turned to mud. I'm surprised more people didn't get stuck. Even not counting the parking lot, the traffic was terrible getting there and getting home. As someone else noted, San Jose is now the largest city in the Bay Area. With a better product and a comfortable stadium, the 49ers will do fine there. Yes, it's very hot in the entire area, except the peninsula including SF, in the summer, but the weather in the fall will be beautiful -- 60s and sunny most days. I suspect a lot of SF-based fans won't go to the new stadium because they're basically in denial about SJ taking over as the largest city. SF is still much more exciting and fun, and much more attractive, but a lot more people live in SJ and points south, including over the mountains in Santa Cruz and Monterey, and southeast to Gilroy and Salinas. The stadium is following where the fans are.

If this means, horrible QB play across the league, then I'm in agreement. There were a lot of plays left on the field by most of the teams. Alex Smith looked great but that was against a Pats D on drugs or something. If it means, for the Bills, I completely disagree. TT looked better than most -- very composed and in control. The interception was catchable by Clay, and for the most part he hit receivers, with most of his incompletions being well-executed throwaways. His running seems to be as elusive as ever, but he was running much less which is a good thing.

The AFC East has a tough schedule this year. You know who else besides the Bills plays that schedule? The Patriots. The Pats have been so strong over so long that their poor drafting position is starting to catch up to them. They've had to go to expensive FAs to fill gaps, arguably overpaying for some of them. Gilmore is a decent CB but he's getting Richard Sherman money. Gillislee is a good RB and I wish he was still on the Bills, but he's getting way too much. The Pats' D looked horrible against KC, and it looks like Brady misses Edelman more than we expected. I reserve the right to disavow this post in three months when the Pats win the SB again, but NE's fun and games have to end sooner or later. If the Bills DBs can get it together, I think the Bills sweep the Pats and Jets, split with the fish, and win the division at 10-6.

I never saw an explanation of the play in the first quarter when the Jets intercepted and the returner fell down from colliding with a teammate. He started to get up and a Bill jumped over to knock the ball away. The Bills all thought it was a fumble, and so did I, but the refs called the Jets player down by contact, and we just moved on. When exactly did that contact occur?

I tend to think how a player looks from week to week has a lot to do with the scheme being used. The scheme they used today was designed to be good enough to beat the Jets and probably also not to show much about exotic packages. So Dareus probably was doing about what he was told to do. That said there was no reason for the D line not to exert itself. None of the starting four was very visible. Again, it could by design, that they were supposed to keep the Jets' O linemen from getting onto our LBs, so they just did that. There are games within the games, and there is no way we civilians are going to know whether a guy was failing to accomplish his assignments.

The Bills secret plan to catch up with the Pats is to get NE to spend lots of money on "stealing" our FAs. They are all talented players but not worth what NE is paying them. So to fill gaps on their team the Pats have to trade personnel or draft picks. That way disaster lies. What'll BB give us for a slightly used Charles Clay?

All I can figure is that Jonathan Williams was bad in the locker room, or had a bad attitude, or something not related to on-field production. He's young and ready to go. Keeping Tolbert and letting Williams go? Something else must be going on.

I thought the it was wrong to keep our other WRs and let Hogan go, but Hogan really reached his potential when he had Brady throwing perfectly timed darts to him. He isn't a TT kind of receiver. Hogan will NOT want to come back, and if he was traded here would go back to NE as soon as he could.

I'll always have a soft spot in my heart for "Mini" Max Anderson. Lost his RB slot to some guy with initials instead of a first name.

Hopes: No injuries. Fewer penalties. Wenning shows enough to beat out Yates for 3rd string. Someone stands out as a kick returner or punt returner. Expectations: Some poor guy on the bubble gets nicked and it costs him his career. Even more penalties than previous games. Wenning survives but can't cook much without ingredients, if you catch my drift.

I think what all this means is that players have to be in the right situation to show what they can do. OJ looked terrible the first couple of years, before Saban came in and built the O line and an offense that featured OJ. A lot of high draft pick QBs have their careers ruined because they're picked by bad teams who can't assemble the other pieces to go with them, so they struggle, lose confidence, see their coaches get fired and start over with new, etc. Dak Prescott is a good player but he's playing behind the best O line in the NFL, and had a stud rookie RB. So, yeah, he looks really good. Would Andrew Luck look good playing for the Cowboys? Yeah, definitely. He'd be an all-pro. Even being in the right place doesn't guarantee success. A lot of talented players don't have their heads screwed on right, and end up sabotaging themselves. You need talent, a good situation, a good attitude, a good coach -- without all these factors, no one becomes a star.

Perfect. Just perfect.

Absolutely right. I've been saying this since before that season started. We had the great defense carried over from the Marrone/Schwartz regime, and now had Watkins, Shady, TT, a very good O line on the left side at least -- but Wrecks screwed the pooch. No discipline, no organization imposed from above. Ryan had relied on leadership from the players, and Mario and Dareus worked against him instead of supporting him. The wrong coach for this team. With the right coach, this team was going to the playoffs, and Whaley's decisions would have looked a lot better. It was the Pegulas who hired Wrecks, not Whaley, and the team built for that one year didn't hold up during the second year of the coach's tenure.

Too bad about Rambo. I think he's been hurt by the timing of his moves, missing OTAs at both Miami and his return here. When he was here the first time, I thought he was better than Duke Williams, whom we kept last season after letting Rambo go.

Kromer is coaching the O line for the Rams. I'm not sure why the Bills didn't keep him since he clearly did a great job at elevating the performance of the players, and the blocking schemes the Bills used last year were very effective (led the league in rushing).

All the posters complaining about trading good young players (Watkins, Darby) are assuming those guys would be here for years to come. Watkins is going to get huge money from somewhere after this season, and at that point the Bills still won't have their QB to make staying look attractive. Darby saw Gilmore cash in, and he was ready to bail immediately. We wouldn't have had either of those guys next year, face it. And McBeane doesn't expect to win this year. So, do the math. Get what you can. For those listing all the draft picks left from 2013-16 (not many), yes, that's really bad. But at least we traded Alonso, a good player, for Shady, a great player. But even with that, those drafts are the reason we're not going anywhere this year.

Nice. It's almost true, too, except for Peterman. You can cancel NFL Sunday Ticket up to the day the regular season starts. I cancelled yesterday.

Next year's draft will be in 2018, THIRTY FIVE YEARS since we drafted a good QB. You have to have a lot of talent to make that many bad choices.

I was NOT happy when we drafted Ragland. Yes, he was a powerful LB behind Alabama's great D line, but the only way he fits in the NFL is in a 3-4 alongside three fast LBs who can cover, because he can't. Ragland was too slow to play a 4-3 MLB even before he got hurt. Ragland was a flawed pick, a guy who lacks the versatility and athleticism to play wherever he's needed. I think Preston Brown has this year to start, and next year to look over his shoulder. I think the Bills will be trying just as hard to draft the next Luke Kuechly as they are to find the franchise QB (unless Peterman surprises, in which case the LB hunt will be even more intense than QB). The Bills were built to win in 2015, but their coach failed them, and they failed their coach. On paper, the talent was there. When that fell apart, it really fell apart. Now the Bills are trying to win in 2019 or possibly 2018, depending on how things pan out. I feel sorry for Shady, and for Kyle Williams. As to the trade, the term sunk costs applies. It would have been worse if Whaley was still here and he held on to Ragland because he drafted him and his own reputation was at stake.

He doesn't need to catch many balls to affect the game. Just the threat of his speed forced DCs to adjust their game plan. Among many other reasons why Bills WRs will struggle this year is that we have no one with that kind of speed. However, he got hurt once get rolled on by some lineman. Broke a rib, I think. That speed comes with a body that can't withstand the forces in the game. How many people here called him Glass Goodwin, with good reason? Still. He's a great guy and I commend him for his approach to life.

I miss the NFL. What Ray Nitschke would have done to an opponent coming into his territory who wasn't paying attention, would have been worse. The NFL now wants to let offenses move the ball so players get to roam at will. Somehow offenses were able to score back then, but there was never a track team element to the sport, instead there was toughness and violence. Also there was a kind of a code. A guy who took cheap shots got paid back in kind. Also we had 220 pound LBs and 280 pound OLs, so the sheer bulk was different.

The only important question is, can he help the team. Yes, certainly he can. He can play better than any of the other available options. He's a running QB like TT so the offensive sets and game plans would work either way. Yes, sign him.