Mr. WEO

Great---Miller had to carry Aaron Donald for 13 games last year.....now he has to carry this guy too??

Meanwhile, in the Tyrod, Peterman, Kevon ("I suffered being called 'Kevin' most of my life") Seymour, Sammy Watkins, Robert Foster threads are all at least 3 pages...

How would he know that? No one has seen them play a real game yet

This, and he briefly stole McD's sanity. He's an absolute criminal.

because they have no liability and because it would be just dumb, the Bills and the NFL would never pay off a plaintiff. Just stop. Also, and again for the guy with superior reading skills, the DA did not get the case a year ago—it was weeks ago. They haven’t decided on charges. Repeating your falsehood doesn’t make it true. At least you have the very little sense to raise the white flag on this one….adios!

Will the Howard, Hodgins and Blackshear be moved to Off The Wall

Beane really needed another thread telling what a great to job he did this week. he thanks you because he really didn’t get the lift he was hoping for from the one thread.

Must not stay

oh man, so much wrong in this post! 1. The Bills are not named and can't be held liable. There is absolutely no way they would ever offer money to settle this suit. Besides being just idiotic even to contemplate, can you imagine what would happen when THAT story inevitably came out?? For a rookie Punter who hasn't played a game? 2. The NFL would never be party to such a goofball scheme. 3. "The DA" hasn't "said it wasn’t solid evidence to get anything". In fact the DA hasn't commented on the merits of the case as it just got the case a few weeks ago from SDPD. 4. your theory is that she enjoyed her time with Araiza so much that she went in to "get more" from his teammates---and it was just a little too much for her? How did you "easily" come to this possibility, when you say "we don't know the real facts"? yikes

The Bills are not party to the suit. Their lawyer knew they would never pay her any money. That makes zero sense and that's not what he was doing by notifying the Bills. Also, embellishing a bill of particulars in a suit isn't going to prompt a settlement. No offer would be made before discovery was complete. Then the defesne would know exactly what the plaintiff had in evidence. Finally, it's a little too late for an NDA, don't you think? She has disclosed everything already.

True, there are a few houses within a mile radius. lol

Bruce Smith?

lol what?

check out the satellite map.....

Favre retired (first time) after a great season in 2007. They didn't get rid of him.

lol bought it for 1+ mil 3 years ago. wants a 50% premium. It's gross--tan and white everywhere, bizarre tiny windows all in back. cheap plastic trim pieces in the kitchen (which is a decorative nightmare). Sad master bath. Yard is 4 acres of nothing....in the middle of nowhere. Basement unfinished. This is like McMansion parody.

No surprise there...

He's still getting signed by teams and they are paying. Things are going very well for him.

The board was screaming for another Barkley thread. Thank you...

Carted off? The link said he jogged off.

That would make him top 32 in one position.

It should be obvious that the only thing they figured out is they should have cut him as soon as the suit was made public, instead of inviting the predictable onslaught of bad public reaction before admitting the inevitable—Araiza had to go. Someone in the building, after knowing he was being sued for “gang rape” and “intoxicated rape” for a month, and then faced with the public release of the gross details, should have said: “ok that’s it. Rook P has to go or we’re going to get creamed until we cut him”. No one said this obvious truth….instead they double down on the bungling by announcing their decision (firing a radioactive player) was in HIS “best interest”. Lol wtf.

Watson put himself “on the shelf” before he was sued. He refused to play for them ever again. Why do people keep getting this wrong?

I hear what you are saying, but the details in the suit were available (in graphic detail) on thursday, yet they were still publicly standing by him. So I don't buy that they were swayed by new info. The sheite-storm that came with the public filing of the suit was entirely predictable. Who didn't see that coming?? He was cut because the owners said pull the plug, after 2 days of avoidable embarrassment for the organization. The Bills wasted massive public capital for 2 days over a rookie Punter who hadn't played a real game for them yet. Having decided to stick with him for a month knowing what they knew, they should have just dumped him when the bomb dropped Thursday. Anyone in that organization who figured they could just "get through this" after Thursday without having to cut him needs to have their head examined. 2 days later, they cut him. Shocking...

After they were given a heads up of the impending filing and the nature of the allegations and after they conducted a thorough investigation, what did they learn Thursday? They were still publicly standing behind him. Did they learn something new Friday? They still sent him to Carolina as the intended Punter for the game. Did they learn something new at 5:30 Friday, when they pulled him from the lineup? Was is on Saturday when they finally cut him loose that they learned this new info?