vincec

I disagree. I think that people spend far too much time looking for and lamenting over a problem's "roots." Whether it's what someone did to you or your parents, how you grew up, where you grew up, some bad stroke of luck, a poor decision, ... whatever. Life is unfair. Everyone has problems. Everyone has to face adversity. It's how we choose to react to them in the present that determines how things will go in the future. Understanding the past can be helpful if it gives you an insight as to how you can react better now (like perhaps not prescribing painkillers so easily for injuries in the future), but using it as an excuse or a justification for anything is really counterproductive to improving situations. IMO, of course.

I must have missed the part where the Bills WR corp became so good that they can afford to dump good WRs. I think maybe they should wait so see how the season goes first...

Especially since Walsh basically changed the way the game is played on offense. So, beyond his record as a winner, his impact on the game really should make him top 5 IMO. But it’s a fine point. Um, what? i think you’d better consult some Packer fans before you have Mike McCarthy ahead of Lombardi.

Why bother?

Monopoly Wizardry Bard's Tale Planescape: Torment Axis and Allies

Let me put it this way- he can't really contribute any less than last season, can he? So any improvement is a bonus.

So his tireless search for the real killers is finally starting to bear fruit?

If Oliver gets 9 sacks as a rookie DT in a rotational system then I'll be amazed.

This is nice, and the logical place to start, but until contact starts there's no way to evaluate how Dawkins actually looks so this is basically just PR.

I wish him well but this is kind of the way I feel too. Other Olympic hopefuls have been training for their sports all that time. His chances are pretty slim, IMO.

The obvious choice. Who wouldn''t want a peak inside that circus?

Good for him. If anybody can skip a voluntary minicamp it's him. I seriously doubt in 20 years when he looks back he will be saying "Man, I really with I had gone to that minicamp I missed."

You'd have to go with Montana because of his playoff and especially Super Bowl record, but I think Young was the better QB. He just had to deal with a loaded Dallas team during his prime that limited him to the one Super Bowl. Besides, if this poll is to determine the "franchise" QB then Montana is the obvious choice because Young never fully got out of his shadow in San Francisco. I'm sure local fans would overwhelmingly vote for Montana.

Fans don't always know best...

I was wondering the same thing. Maybe their story is that he gave them the jewelry as gifts. Otherwise, it's a pretty crazy robbery.

More squats!

It’s awesome that when someone is going through a personal tragedy there’s always a reporter to dig up the “story” and announce it to the world.

Young has always been my guy. If I had to take a QB, he'd be the guy. Over anyone.

Ferguson is second. Anyone who thinks Fitz or even Bledsoe (in Buffalo) was better than him is not adjusting their statistics across the different eras. Actually I think that Kemp would probably be second best and he's not even eligible by these rules. Favre is GBs franchise QB per the article.

Roman will get that offense humming. They're a perfect fit for each other.

Yes, in route to their crushing victory over Jacksonville.

The hall of the pretty good.

No. Maybe equal at TE, RB and DL but all other positions should be improved.

Julio Jones broke his foot too, so he’s obviously on his way to greatness.

The ball never hits the ground.