All_Pro_Bills

The DOJ can go after Kushner right now but I'm wondering if they aren't because of his dad, Charles? At one point Charles was a big-time Democratic donor so maybe the deal is hands off Jerod? Chris Christie locked up Charles while he was in the DA's office. When Trump "won" in 2016 Jerod had Chris dumped from Trump's team and that I expect is the key reason Christie is gunning for Trump. For revenge.

The Stinkin' Project's false comparison continues. If you don't want Trump, then you must settle for the not any better choice of "but there's no evidence" Joe Biden. It's like picking between dying in the gas chamber or the electric chair.

What's ironic and somewhat comical with your reply is that KGB officer is talking about you.

Better living through science!

The problem from day one with the COVID mandates and lockdowns was the one-size-fits-all approach. The masks were one of those things. Old people and those already having compromised health were at risk. Others were not. Instead of focusing resources on protecting those most at risk, like nursing home residents, the elderly in general, and people with a condition like heart disease or obesity, the government obsessed with locking down healthy and young people. These people should have been left to continue life as normal. Outside of a handful of people still wearing masks driving along in their vehicles, I expect few people are going to be willing to along with this approach again. For starters, and comically, many officials that imposed these lockdowns with zeal now claim they were against them. And inflections from the election variant by all accounts results in mild to moderate symptoms. I won't even get into the vaccine mandates. Although lately, I've seen troubling details revealed about the mRNA technology applied. We're told mRNA stands for messenger RNA but now I'm seeing it referred to as modified RNA. Totally different, and potentially dangerous, from my understanding of this type of medical technology. I guess we now live in a country where most fat, dumb, and happy people are comfortable and content with only one person being called out and charged with lying.

I'm thinking it's the Jets that need to worry about how to defend the Bills offense with upgrades including Kincaid, a better and faster WR group, some physical upgrades in the RB group along with some offensive line upgrades. Add in a healed up right elbow for Allen. For all the worries about the Jets offense the Bills are 2 1/2 point favorites on the road to open the season on Monday night. At home that would be what? 5 1/2?

I'd make the argument the grounds and reasons for determining "medical necessity" in the cases involving children that have partially developed minds and bodies vs. that of fully developed adults is insufficient and bordering on medically unethical to warrant these procedures where "buyers remorse" is common. A surgeon could remove your gall bladder and appendix tomorrow along with cutting off your left leg but if its not medically necessary professional and ethical doctors are not going to do it. And your insurance won't provide an authorization or pay for it.

It's not a conspiracy. It's an investigation by the House of official corruption. President Biden has claimed from the beginning he knows nothing of his son's business, never discussed his son's business, and never participated in his son's business. However, there are over 1,000 e-mails where using various government issued e-mail aliases Joe communicated with his son and his business. Proof his contention he didn’t know or discuss business with his son is false. Along with this, sworn public witness testimony to the House committee that then VP Biden was either on the phone or in-person at business events with clients. Clients where bribes and government influence where exchanged and agreed to between the firm and the clients. So another lie about not participating. What's left is tracing the money trail back to the former VP. Something the House committee likely has in their possession. So Joe lied on 3 points and unless you can conjure up a good excuse used e-mail aliases to hide his identity. A reasonable person would conclude this amounts to suspicious activity. Along with this witness testimony collaborating the authenticity of the laptop contents. What more do we need? If anyone is waiting for DOJ or FBI to produce evidence they'll be disappointed to learn those agencies have spent all their time and effort to bury the evidence and make the story go away. Appointing a special counsel that has spent his time helping with that isn't going to produce any revelations. Hardly a conspiracy but rather lots of facts, data, records, and information.

Yeah the Democrats are real angels and such gracious losers in 2016.

Robert L Peters sends his holiday wekend regards.

And we've been led to believe the liberals that view themselves as moral and ethical superiors were above vindictive politically motivated behavior.

In short, in the case of Fetterman's health, the citizens of Pennsylvania were intentionally deceived and lied to by various "professionals' in medicine and politics for the purpose of getting him elected. Under the legal standards of criminal action currently employed by the administration in Washington, this should warrant an investigation for election interference. You know, lying, making false statements, conspiracy to defraud the state and the voters, that kind of stuff.

I'm positive the AG is preparing conspiracy and false statement charges against these former IC officials and others for the knowingly false statements about the Hunter laptop origin that imisinformed 2020 voters and interfered with the election. Sadly, I jest. As we all know no such thing is going to happen as these chaps are above the law. And there's no proof! Just a publicly published letter full of lies. But again, no proof,! Say it again, no proof. Now say it like you believe it!

For all practical purposes, the war will be over before the end of the year and then Democrats will be explaining how Trump wasted billions and failed to do enough to help Ukraine prevail.

And teachers of good conscience just play along out of fear of reprisals and punishment for objecting. The left's desired vision of Democracy is indeed a farce yet they insist on claiming the moral high ground. Are they delusional or just evil? I say number two.

Both are incredibly unbelievable. Joe's as dirty as a NYC subway bathroom and yet you're still in complete denial.

You seem good at making up excuses. I've got a secret burner phone I use to set up dates with 3 or 4 women from work. When my wife finds the phone I want you to clearly explain to her I'm completely innocent and she has no proof of anything. I'm certain she will believe that completely. Just like the fine job you're doing defending Joe's payoff operation.

Most amazing is the support systems built up inside the government and the private sector that support, surround, and protect officials players like our POTUS. All performing a role while generously compensated courtesy of the taxpayers. Indeed a swamp of various slimy and slithery creatures.

New records released by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) reveal that Hunter Biden’s firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners, exchanged over 1,000 emails with the office of then-Vice President Joe Biden during the Obama Administration. So much for never discussing and not knowing anything about his son's business activities. Or 200 more emails remain hidden due to the Biden White House citing executive privilege. “Release would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors, or between such advisors,” NARA claimed. So Joe Biden was sharing e-mails with Rosemont Seneca that contained confidential advice given to the VP. So did Joe violate document handling rules by disclosing "secret" government correspondence 200 times? No worries, its not like he read anything out loud to other people like Trump is said to have done. But still no evidence!

Men and women are both capable of making good and bad choices and unfortunately when they make bad choices its usually the children that suffer the most. And this toxic masculinity fantasy is dreamed up by feminists fighting "the patriarchy" portraying men as irredeemable and immoral hapless idiots, dependent on "strong" empowered women for guidance on proper conduct.

That's not moving anything. As I said, "the supporting cast of political and media operatives that willfully lied, obstructed, and censored the truth need to be called out on the carpet to provide some real and truthful explanations for flying cover". What's their quid pro quo?

Holding you to your superior intellectual abilities and higher ethical and moral standards you claim to hold over and above those of the "idiots". Time to walk the talk.

I'm all for answers. But my problem isn't so much what Jared and Hunter did or didn't do. Their actions are secondary to the real problem. My problem is the way the media and political establishments acted and reacted to the stories. From the beginning the Kushner/MSB arrangement was scrutinized and questioned. While the Hunter/Joe Biden story, initiated with the laptop, was painted as some kind of Russian dis-information conspiracy by 51 former IC members, the MSM and social media. And anybody raising objections or disagreeing with that conclusion got steamrolled. I can agree with you that the payments and arrangements need to be clarified in both cases. But in the case of Biden, the supporting cast of political and media operatives that willfully lied, obstructed, and censored the truth need to be called out on the carpet to provide some real and truthful explanations for flying cover.

That's still not equivalent to bribes and payoffs. To this point everything appears to be legal. Do you have proof these are legal violations? If we want to discuss and agree there might be some ethical issues we can certainly do that. if you're on a fishing expedition to find crimes then you're coming up empty. File a complaint with the SEC.

Its still not equivalent. Its a publicly disclosed and legal investment into a registered fund. What are the terms and arrangements? Sure I'm curious but its a private arrangement between two parties and its nobody's business as long as the law is being followed. Which clearly appears to be the case. Might there be some ethical questions? Sure but that's another issue altogether than legal violations.