All_Pro_Bills

I'll tell you what annoyed me more than the 13 seconds? The 12 seconds in week 6 against the Chiefs where they did the exact same thing except this time the Chiefs had only one timeout. They squib kicked this time but it made no difference. Granted it was 63 yards but come on.

One thing about propaganda is when people know its propaganda the main effect is to produce laughter and contempt for its sponsor. In this case it might be for those sad sack fools at NPR. Time to get real jobs for those folks. Something like shoving horse crap as they've got a lot of practical experience.

Most likely nothing will be done until the point where everyone is forced to do something by circumstances and events. Two parts politics and one part procrastination. Sadly, anyone with a rudimentary understanding of finance knows all this debt accumulation is unsustainable and it will never be paid back. There will be some form of default, either direct or indirect. A problem is the government spends too much money on too many programs. We can debate which programs and to what extent but that's just an exercise in futility. Most people see the solution as the other guy either pays more or gets less and they're left alone. Another problem is consumers have way too much debt too. What I think is holding up action and solutions is citizens have no clear and obvious collective interests as a nation. Well the collective interest people don't understand is a debt crisis will emerge, when or how is uncertain, and the value of the money they hold either through wages, investment, or savings will drop while the cost of everything they need will increase. Just like it has in the past 1 1/2 years but not by 8 or 9 percent but by 10 to 100 times worse. Then everybody will be looking around at each other wondering how we let it get to this point.

A wild guess. The job responsibilities are assisting in the laundering of US aid money to the government of Ukraine which is magically transferred into the accounts of various oligarchs and public officials. Such as the owners of Barisma. These officials use the funds for a lavish lifestyle buying things like luxury villas in places like Spain, Italy, and Greece. As a result of providing this service, which is ensuring no US government accountability audits will be performed against the funds, the employee will receive a percentage of the proceeds. Through family association with the VP of the United States the blocking of any audits or questions about aid will be performed.

Trump was impeached because he was investigating how much cash the Biden's sucked out of Ukraine. What some described as trying to dig up "dirt" on his opponent. A type of election interference. What it meant was you can't ask questions about corrupt politicians that are protected by the system. But I understand the threshold of proof here on PPP is dependent on the subject of the investigation. We've got lots of slow-witted posters here convinced Trump sold nuclear secrets to our enemies with absolutely not a single shred of what might constitute the minimum level of suspicion. They are most gullible and buy over and over again the proverbial Brooklyn Bridge proverb. With the Biden's we've got official FBI documents detailing specific activities, most of which are illegal. Wire transfer records, avoidance of taxes, and unaccounted for sources of income. We have a House committee investigating the Biden's which is expected to produce about 10 criminal referrals of Hunter Biden, for starters. But no "proof". I find the entire debate mentally draining and senseless because unless Joe Biden walked up to their door, rang the doorbell, and announced he was guilty many of his defenders here won't be compelled to use any common sense or objective thinking and acknowledge there's more to the story than smoke.

Extra credit points if you correctly guess which US political, media, or social justice "person" demands a boycott and sanctions against Italy?

These deniers must have landed on their heads a few too many times as children. The IRS investigators concluded taxes were not paid. Along with this the income on which those taxes were not paid could not be substantiated through some "legal" source. The investigators found a trail of payments to the Biden's from various foreign entities. ETF transactions from these sources to various bank accounts, shell companies, and then into the personal accounts of Biden family members. Transactions with dates, accounts, and dollar amounts. When they brought these cases to their superiors at the IRS to initiate some legal action consistent with IRS tax evasion investigations of unpaid income taxes from illegal sources their superiors were pressured from above. Succumbing to the pressure they removed these investigators from the case and as a result the investigations were halted. Do they think higher-ups in Washington pressured the IRS investigating team's management to stop the investigation because they were finding nothing? Quite the opposite. They had the goods on the Biden's. The IRS knew it, the DOJ, knew it, the FBI knew it, and the Biden's knew it. Now we all know it too. But the DOJ and FBI leadership are just as corrupt. And will do nothing because they're running a political protection racket. That's the proof. I'd like to see how they would handle an IRS audit where they've got the goods on them to this extent. Unpaid income taxes from illegally obtained and unreported income. Go in there and tell them they have no proof. See how far that gets you with the IRS. I await their responses with the usual excuses and deflection.

They were busy with doctors fudging diagnosis codes and death certificates to receive special reimbursements from the government for handling COVID cases and deaths. But some of our friends here are going to tell us doctors and members of the medical community would never do such a thing and will always act with the highest ethical and moral standard and none would think of fudging anything to push some extra cash into their pockets. Even though its demonstrated that medical fraud, waste, and abuse incidents amount to billions every year.

Do you? I guess you're a ***** expert at everything. I'm expecting to see you on Jeopardy next week.

Although there's a lot of hoopla and virtue signalling from western sources worrying about those poor Africans and Middle Easterners almost all the grain shipments out of Ukraine were going to Europe. So its not like Africa/ME are suddenly being deprived of grain with the agreement ending. They were already getting screwed.

You're obsessed with characterizing things in emotional terms while avoiding the meat of the argument. In this case the Democrats claim that censorship doesn't exist while attempting to censor speakers from speaking. What are they so afraid of? That's what we're talking about.

Which party denies they're censoring the American public and "unapproved" experts but proved their complicity by attempting, and failing, to censor public testimony from individuals they were afraid to let speak freely? If anyone's trying so hard it's you attempting to justify and ignore censorship. What I'm doing is pointing out and applauding efforts to protect the principles of freedom and democracy. While you side with the authoritarians and censors. Shame on you.

Are you drunk this morning? As this makes no sense.

An amazing job of exposing themselves as fascist censors and big government storm troopers gleefully supporting trampling over the 1st amendment rights of American citizens.

Kennedy gave testimony at a hearing on government censorship where Democrats attempted to censor and block him from testifying all while claiming no such government censorship programs and efforts exist. Basically demonstrating the behavior they claim doesn't exist. Just amazing. Lying mofo's can't even get their story straight.

In reality QB's don't beat each other because they're never on the field at the same time. They beat the other guys defense. Also, of the three QB's , Allen, Burrow, and Mahomes, Allen had the least effective supporting cast of offensive line and skill players. That absolutely had an impact on the results each QB produced. As for the defenses, from a talent perspective I think the three teams are fairly close. The problem with the Bills defense has been its predictability. When facing great QB's that's a terrible trait. You know which 4 guys are rushing and how they're coming at you the line blocking calls are easy and the QB pre-snap reads are too.

Garland needs to refer these cases to a special prosecuter. But he won't.

Same old tired ass argument. But, but, but Trump allegations that don't cite details. Divert, deflect, and deny. The Biden's are as dirty as Pigs in a mud hole and referring to Trump as some reason to ignore their graft and corruption is reprehensible and dishonest.

Many seem to have amnesia when it comes to recalling how in January 2017 Democrats urged electors in various swing States to change their vote during the electoral certification to Hillary because the election was stolen. But of course light can be bent and subtle nuances and differences can be cited to see this as something other than election interference or an attempt to disrupt the certification process.

I wouldn't expect Trump to have the ability to develop a coherent plan any more than I would expect Biden to address a media Q&A without a list of scripted and pre-defined questions and answers. But I would expect that Trump's co-conspirators would have some level of competency to develop a "plan" that had a chance of working. What was the plan? Storm the Capitol building. Have a few dozen crazies engage in physical confrontation with Capitol Police while the majority of the protesters mill about inside the building taking tours and selfies? Then when the government marshals a force big enough to engage the protest and they enter the Capitol to perform a sweep and clear mission what was the plan? For the protesters to hit back at fully armed SWAT and other heavily armed law enforcement and military personnel with the canes and fanny packs? It seems like that was it.

it would make me happy if you could admit there was no insurrection plan. Even the slowest and dullest among these folks would upon review of the "plan" have concluded it had zero chance of success. So why do it? Go back and don't come back until you bring me something that might work. The idea that some sort of elaborate conspiracy and grand planning effort proceeded the events of the day is frankly, ridiculous and I won't believe it unless you've got access to the power point deck and the execution plan for 1/6 that you can upload to PPP.

A well scripted failure. Human history's best example of the worst insurrection plan and execution ever. The basic objective of the plan appeared to be "let's occupy a single building and then declare ourselves in control of the country". But overlooked were some details like no weapons, a group comprised of mostly out of shape old people, and most critical no support from any public institutions like some elements of the military that could use "force" to make it all happen. The worst insurrection ever. Maybe that's why nobody wants to take "credit" for the planning? It was embarrassingly awful.

Much of the emphasis behind the original affirmative action idea was based on preferences to address income inequality and economic disparities rather than racial quotas.

Either you trust a an all-powerful central government with power concentrated in Wahington or you don't. If you don't then you want control and power distributed back to the the States and localities which makes it impossible for a small group of people or interests to gain authoritarian or dictatorial powers. Centralized authority is prerequisite for dictators. And the trend in America has been to put more and more power in the hands of Washington. Specifically the executive branch. That's really it. Nothing to do with either major party being good or evil. This is true. Name one dictator that ruled without the ability to concentrate overwhelming power in a central location or organization? They aren't any. Break up Washington. Then stop worrying.

You're betting wrong because I don't care but you've skirted the core of my argument. Well done sir... Given no comeback I'll update and tell you why. In your example I'm pretty certain the person was chosen for ability. In the Snow White re-do they were chosen because of their appearance. That's the point you avoided.