All_Pro_Bills

Crimes against citizens, no problem. Crimes against the government. Death to you!

You should ask Antifa and BLM that question. It seems to have worked for them.

I stopped reading after the first sentence because it's a lie. along with being a belly splitting laughter. The "Deep State's" only concern is maintaining and growing its power and the rule of law is a minor nuisance that can be twisted at its convenience.

Much of what you say I can agree with regarding the MSM but I think we need to timeline-out the progression in their reporting on any particular story or point of contention from ignoring an issue to acknowledging an issue. Such as the border "crisis" example. I don't think spending a year+ proclaiming it wasn't a problem, claiming others were making a big deal over nothing, spreading the message crisis, what crisis?, and then slowly transforming their views as more and more Democratic officials pushed back and felt direct pain, then the media does a couple stories suggesting all is not hearts and flowers a year and a half into millions pouring into the country unimpeded by immigration while being flown all over the country and not pushing back on the administration with hard questions or concerns doesn't equate to the media "covering" the story.

The economy is about to fall off a cliff and deteriorate into the 2024 election. Everyone is getting super pissed and have had enough of the open border. Gas prices are rising. The markets are going to be unstable. And the job market is going to cool dramatically. Credit card debt is as high as it ever was and its not a sign of affluence. GDP revisions coming next week probably won't look too good. The proxy war in Ukraine is going to be viewed as another big, expense policy flop. Internationally, we're losing support and credibility with each passing day. But yeah, the Democrat have it locked up.

What I haven't seen anywhere in the MSM yet are references to this statement by the Polish PM communicating a surprising about-face by one of the most ardent supporters of Ukraine. With an election coming and popularity for war support falling compounded by Ukrainian grain flooding the Polish market the politics have changed dramatically.

I'm not playing the dirtiest pig in the mud hole game. Go ahead, name other sleezy characters. We can discuss them elsewhere. Garland is compromised by politics, the law is an afterthought. As for the special prosecutor, better late than never? But after obstructing investigators like those at the IRS, letting the statute of limitations run out on the most serious charges, and burying evidence like the infamous laptop, what's the point? It's just for show to set up a public facade for getting them to believe Hunter hasn't been protected, or as we've discussed on the board on other topics, being above the law. Which he most certainly has been protected by dad's employees at DOJ and FBI. At the end of the day Joe Biden is protecting Joe Biden.

Hunter is suing a guy that released the e-mails and other items on the laptop claiming invasion of privacy. And all along the media and the President's supporters have been claiming the contents of the laptop were created in some intelligence facility in Moscow. And it's all a Russian psych-op. The shop owner, the people on those e-mails, anyone believing it was real, Russian agents and spreaders of disinformation. All subject to censorship. But how can you sue somebody for invading your privacy when what was published wasn't your property and you've been claiming its all fictitious? By filing a lawsuit Hunter's saying those 51 IC chaps that signed that letter saying it was a Russian operation are natural born liars and the stuff is really his. Which contradicts the story they've been telling. Its wasn't the Russians after all. Who'd have guessed that? So everyone peddling the establishment narrative about a fake laptop is guilty of spreading disinformation or misinformation and why aren't the social media sites marking posts claiming the laptop is the product of Russian agents being brought down, censored, or having warning, this in disinformation added to those posts? One lie begets more lies.

How about some of our enlightened and morally superior liberal posters advocating for open borders and supporting the administration's all are welcome policy hosting 3 or 4 families in their residence? I want to see real and personal conviction and commitment to the cause. Now's your chance to shame the rest of us with deeds rather than your empty words.

This is the guy leading the prosecution of people for misdemeanor trespassing being held without bail or trail for two years lying his ass off in front of Congress and then heading home for the evening rather than some Federal penitentiary. Using the cognitive impairment defense. Slimy weasel.

They're playing the game of make-believe amongst themselves in a big circle-jerk because everyone else knows they're full of crap and are out of excuses.

You haven't addressed my concerns about the short-comings of climate science. I welcome your perspective.

Smart and civil. Defuse a potential confrontation and turn it into a polite difference of supporting different teams among football fans. I did see on the news this morning reports these guys were going at it and arguing most of the game so I'm curious why stadium security didn't notice the problem and step in before it turned fatal? Then agian, we've seen lots of stuff they ignore or don't see. I'm guessing the incident might force the league to start cracking down on rowdy out of control fans.

The problem is when you apply logical thinking to the issue the climate extremists are imposing lots of rules and regulations based on faulty models and predictions. Pretending about 150 years of incomplete temperature data can accurately predict the future and represent 100's of millions of years of unknown climate and temperature variations. One thing that is understood by fossil records and not temperature data is the climate was hotter in Dinosaur times but just why and exactly what drove the temperature absent human impact is unknown. What cause hot cycles to turn to cold cycles which led to ice ages and then cycle back to hotter is unknown. Climate models have no baseline to validate any of their conclusions. And most importsnt, today's climate science is mostly political science. .

I find bacon can be a mess to prepare and actually prefer Turkey bacon. It's much learner and although the taste is noticeably different its not as bad as I originally expected. Cheaper too by about a buck or two.

What do you expect? A check written from Burisma's corporate account issued by the CFO in the name of Joe Biden, then endorsed by Joe Biden, and then deposited into the joint checking account of Joe and Jill Biden? Does the fact the President claimed he had no knowledge of his son's business dealings, then said he never discussed them, and then claimed he wasn't involved, all of which have been proven to be lies, along with what testimony and money laundering through various shell companies and accounts have identified, produce any level of suspicion that he's hiding something big? I mean, if I do a favor for somebody like getting them a $100M contract with a company I'm associated with and the person I help gives my son $5M does the fact I received no direct compensation negate the fact I still did them a favor which by every imaginable scenario is a clear conflict of interest and an illegitimate use of authority to enrich a family member? Or in this case of Joe/Hunter, using the power of his public office to get an investigator off the back of a company that compensates his son? The premise Joe in innocent because you can't prove he received a single penny doesn't absolve him from charges of influence peddling and bribery. So somebody else Joe was conspiring with got the money. Its doesn't matter who got the money.

Yes, I did vote for Bill Clinton. I remember seeing him at a Bills game walking through the main concourse with some secret service guys in tow. I think it was the 2006 season.

The problem with making decisions based on climate models is the limited duration of the data sets. The Earth has been going through cycles of warming and cooling for hundreds of millions of years and we're making big policy decisions based on a partial set of data observations of maybe 150 years. Along with this past models have been terrible at predicting the future. You have zero accurate temperature readings from previous time. Only subjective understanding of warmer or colder. Pronouncements that we have 12 years until the end of humanity embellish the urgency. Yesterday, climate activists were demonstrating at the UN demanding an end to the use of oil. What's comical is they were mostly dressed in windbreakers and rain gear composed of materials derived from petrochemicals. I don't think these people have an comprehension of what the world they're demanding would look like and the implications of switching to more expensive, less efficient, and less reliable sources of electricity generation and the elimination of certain materials which I assume will be replaced by something to be identified.

I think people are making a lot of assumptions about what they believe and what a jury might believe given counter arguments from a defense counsel vs. a grand jury indictment where the prosecutor will tell the GJ the minimum necessary information to acquire an indictment on the charges they've submitted. Such as the bolded hypothetical below. A prosecutor might argue that I'm complicit but convincing a jury when confronted by a defense argument might not so easy. Given I had no knowledge of your actions and wasn't present when the hack occurred. Not to mention it wasn't part of "the plan". The other part is the unconstitutionality of it all. You might have a better understanding of the details around the charges than I do but I don't recall any of the charges indicating any specific article or amendment to the Constitution was violated in the indictments. One thing for sure, any convictions will be appealed. Perhaps all the way to the Supreme Court. Also not sure any of this is hurting Trump, or maybe helping Biden is a more appropriate way of looking at it. CBS news poll has Trump over Biden right now 50/49. Which seems incredible. https://www.scribd.com/document/671717605/cbsnews-20230917-SUN#

It does require action. Does this furtherance meet the criteria for action? That's the question. If you and I decide to rob a bank, write down a 5 step plan, discuss the plan, drive by the bank to check it out, and then decide not to do it, then the cops find out we discussed a plan to rob the bank do you think they're going arrest us and a prosecutor would acquire an indictment and attempt to try and convict us of conspiracy to rob the bank?

But it wasn't executed. You can say it was a "conspiracy" but rarely is conspiracy a standalone charge absent some actionable offense.

Biden won't side with Putin but he'll do his best imitation like his Philadelphia "MAGA extremist" speech in Philly. A fool and a tool.

I have a copy of that "plan". It's like the one the Coyote has used to try catching the Roadrunner. There was no "plan".

The concerning thing is the US national debt rose by $1 trillion in just 3 months. Whether its an accelerating trend or a one-time blip isn't clear.

Staggering, vomiting, belligerent drunks can really ruin the game day experience. Especially if you're introducing younger fans to the live-game experience.