Thurman#1

They took all the dead cap to get rid of Diggs because Allen and Diggs did not work together well at all that fourth year. He was still a terrific pickup for the young Josh Allen, helping him out a ton. I already said that, but it's so obvious it shouldn't have needed to be said. You're advancing your argument not one jot. Why is that? As for your argument about Coleman ... Well, yeah, after that big game, things went downhill, AFTER THE INJURY. You're right, after the injury, he did indeed perform much less well. It prevented him from making the kind of contested catches he was making a lot of before his wrist damage, and of course his results did look a ton worse. But again, in the five games before the injury his yards looked like this: 51, 49, 26, 125, 70. An average of 64.2 YPG. He'd improved a lot from his first few weeks. Then came Nov. 3rd and the injury. He was never the same. But when healthy, he'd started to look really good. Again, at that point he was #2 among the rookie receivers, even though he was the 5th guy picked.

Oh, sorry, autocorrect strikes again. Yes, I typed Taron Johnson, not Aaron. Not drafted by Beane, but drafted by this regime. I guess if you want to edge them out, I understand. I won't argue. As summed up here, I don't totally agree with your opinion here, but I think it's certainly in the reasonable range. As a GM overall, you have to say that he's got something to prove and his term will look better with a Lombardi attached. As for his ability to draft, I don't put him at the top of that group you cited, but not at the bottom either. Drafting is tough and he's right up there with them.

Yeah, totally messed up Josh. Yeah, I mean, his completion percentage went down from 63.5% to 66.5%. Oh, hang on, that's up, not down. And his total yards went down from 4283 to 4306. Oh, wait, that's up also. Josh had a very good year that year, as he always has Allen wasn't "totally messed up" or anything like it. That's a completely ridiculous take. Is it maybe a legit contention that Diggs didn't help much that last year here? Yeah, totally. Hard to say why, no matter how you pretend to totally understand the situation. But he was very unproductive, for whatever reason. I know I was wildly pissed seeing the hand gesture he made to Josh on that last drop in the Chiefs playoff game, like "oh, we just didn't quite get together well enough there." But the first three years Josh leaned on him tremendously. Neither made the other. You have to be willing to contort yourself into absolute pretzels to pretend that. They helped each other. Tremendously. And yes, players do get injured, Keon included. Some years. Not others. Again, you're contorting yourself like a circus act here. Extrapolation only looks "meaningless" if you don't happen to find the meaning it shows as convenient to your own pre-judgments. "A decent first half of the season"? Again, nonsense. For a rookie he was having an excellent first year, second in yards among rookies, if I remember correctly, despite being the fifth WR taken, with two in the top 9 picks. Did Keon do very well in that one game? Um, yeah, that's how it works. Good games and bad games. I mean, if you want to "take out that clear outlier," his best game, fine, but you have to throw out the worst also. And what you get is just about the same average. He was having a really good rookie year that first half, and getting better. He was a different player after that injury, suddenly losing about every contested catch when up till then he'd been winning a lot of them.

Yes, but what you're not mentioning here is that the reason they could make that trade was that they originally had the 6th round pick in 2021 due to crappy play. They were able to trade back and get the extra pick. We're not holding their draft slot against them. But we're also not willing to look away and pretend it didn't exist. We're saying that that terrific slot came to them from crappy play, a 4-win season, which is worse than the Bills have put up since 2010, far before the current regime. And helped them get some of the best players they've drafted.

Manning may come out in 2026. Or not. We don't know. Some other good young players may well be there.

Power was a terrific safety. Yes, the last half of a year here he was a shell of himself and in Miami he didn't look like he'd recovered a bit. But he was excellent through most of his career here. Diggs was a great pickup. Great. No, things didn't end well. And you can certainly argue the extension near the end. But he helped Josh become Josh Allen. Elam was a bad pick. It's not like other teams don't screw up sometimes. They do. Every single one of them does. Yes, Reid still talks about Mahomes, when he's asked about it. And yes, Roseman goes on about Hurts when he's asked about it. Beane was asked.#3, fine. But the fact is that he was playing like a lower-level #2 -- as a rookie -- until the injury. And yes he had some drops late. Think the wrist injury might have had something to do with that? He might easily have gotten 750 if he'd played without an injured wrist. No way to say for sure, but in the first 8 games he put up 396 yards. And in the last games before the injury on Nov. 3rd he'd averaged 64 yards a game, We don't really know what he'll be but there's a pretty decent chance he'll be quite good indeed.

Well, first, people don't say, "We can't find difference makers picking so late." They say, correctly, that it's harder finding difference makers picking so late. It just is. And if you pick late more years, it will be harder in those years. The Bills did pick later more often. And yet they also found difference makers. All Pros aren't the only difference makers, they just aren't. Aaron Johnson is a difference maker. And an All Pro. Matt Milano is a difference maker. And an All Pro. Dion Dawkins is a difference maker. Spencer Brown looks like he's getting there. Christian Benford is a difference maker. Terrell Bernard too. Josh certainly is, kinda goes without saying. Kincaid showed every sign before the injury, but still has a lot more to prove. There's a reason why in every draft ranking the Bills are listed top six or seven for the length of the Beane/McDermott era despite winning more games than nearly anyone else (including Philly with three SBs in that time including two wins) and thus starting with worse picks. They've done quite well. The last three years both have been really good teams. The years before that Philly did much better with getting losses and higher picks during the years when they brought in guys who are now matured pros. The thing Philly has done a lot better is being pretty bad in years when they didn'T make the Super Bowl. Damn them. Very well run franchise. And the Bills are close.

That bit about the Bills and Eagles evening out the further you go back is only if you go back specifically to 2018. The reason Beane had high picks in 2018 had a lot to do with McDermott trading way back in 2017 to get higher to be able to pick a QB in 2018. So in 2017 the Eagles picked 14th while the Bills picked 27th. And you can't expect Ford to be All-Pro, he was a 2nd rounder. All-Pro would have been a very significant over-performance. Edmunds at 16 got two Pro Bowls, that's meeting expectations. Oliver has been a bit below expectations, but everyone has some of those. The Chiefs did indeed trade up for Mahomes, from 27th to 10th. And the Bills traded up for Allen. Traded up almost as far, from 21st to 7th in two steps. So if you want to give the Chiefs credit for savvy you have to do the same for the Bills.

Really? In the last four years, you say? I only see one, from 15 up to 13. And a few other small moves a bit further back. The last five years, in which the Bills never won less than 11 games, the Bird had one year when they won four games and one year of 9-8. That helps your draft slots.

Yup. That and the fact that he hadn't been one of those coaching camp regulars that have their mechanics smoothed out early and get early exposure to everything.

David Carr was a bust largely because Houston figured an offensive line was more a guideline than a requirement. He had the confidence and the poise pounded out of him. That team failed him.

As I understand it, the convo went like this. Starks was asked which NFL he was looking forward to picking off the most. "I think I want to get Josh Allen," Starks said. "I want to get Josh Allen, it would just be fun and a really cool moment for me." And you folks think Josh takes offense or gets angry? Zero chance. Our first rounder was asked the same exact question and said Mahomes and Lamar. Think they're furious at Max? Again, zero chance. This is a nothingburger. Ramsey I would guess pissed him off. Ramsey was trying to shake him. Very much didn't.

Yup, including 9.5 in 2023. He'll cost more than a camp body. But how much more is unclear.

Yeah, and we'd be right back to the cap situation we were in before last year, where we had to let people go. More of them than Epenesa. Can't see it. We now have $11M under the cap in 2026. After these moves we're probably significantly over in 2026, without even thinking about how to re-sign Watt if we kept him, which we would probably want to do. Fun to think about. Yeah, this is my guess too.

Yes, he did have a harder time this year but again, the finger injuries really contributed. Drop rate isn't perfect either, nothing is. There's always a question about whether something was a drop or a bad throw. It's not always clear. But it's probably the best single stat we've got, certainly better than catch percentage. Except for last year, when again he had hand injuries, he's shown terrific hands, not just good but excellent.

Um, what world? This one. Catch rate isn't a receiver stat. It's a QB and receiver and defender and wind stat. QB misses you by 20 yards, or throws it short right to the DB and your catch rate goes down. It isn't a WR stat. Agreed that was a bad drop in the playoffs. But everybody drops some, and he dropped that because he lost his footing, which was very likely partly due to his injury. He still should have caught it. But everybody has some drops. Kincaid few. He has excellent hands.

That's certainly not all needed. But it would absolutely be nice!! More QB disruption. That's what's needed.

Bad take. He was injured and his hands have been excellent. But whatever. Believe what you want to believe. "Zach Davidson gives us the same threat," though? Sigh. *shakes head*

This'n. Plus, you put on five pounds on a guy his size and it's just not obvious. At this point, he might be having problems, or he might be right on schedule.

Oh, and yeah Singletary was a very good back, in 2021 and always, really. But your contention that he got really good in the last four games of 2021 because they stopped platooning him? Also doesn't make sense. He averaged 4.6 YPC for the season. And considerably less over the last four games. He was still good. But not better, platooned or not. Yes, he got more yards. But not because he was running better. He was just running more, so even though he was getting less per carry he totaled more yards. And again, the Bills got ahead in each game by mostly passing and then turned up the runs later in games to burn clock.

Um, no, I'm not saying that or anything like it Maybe you could actually read my post ... then answer it? That way you could respond to things I actually said? Also didn't say "not fact based." Or anything like it. Again, maybe read and respond to what I actually said. I disagree with some of your facts. One thing you said was that the 2021 Bills changed things around by suddenly stressing the run game the last four games of the season. And as I pointed out, that wasn't true. In three out of those four games they started out stressing the pass much more than the run, got ahead that way and then ran the ball more later to run out the clock. The main problem with your post, though, is the logic. Not the facts, the logic. You claimed that whenever the Bills really stress the run game they play very well. And that this shows that they should and will re-sign James Cook even if he's overpriced. This doesn't follow. The conditional and the conclusion aren't linked. Even if the conditional is 100% factual and true, it doesn't show they should re-sign Cook even if he costs too much. Again, it’s like arguing that oranges are nutritious, healthy and good for you and that therefore you must eat THAT PARTICULAR ORANGE OVER THERE AND NO OTHER, despite the fact that that one particular orange is priced at $500 and has a black spot on it. It doesn’t follow. Even if oranges generally are good, that doesn’t show you need to eat the one orange no matter what. It just doesn’t. Same with your argument. Even if your conditional is 100% true, it doesn’t show we need to re-sign Cook no matter what. There are a ton of different ways to stress the run game. Many of them make economic sense. Such as keeping the OL together which they’ve done such a terrific job with. Or maybe drafting another 3rd round RB next year if Cook keeps insisting on $15M and running him, Ray Davis and Ty Johnson and maybe one more guy fight it out to see who gets to run behind that terrific OL. Oh, and the way you wrote made it seem like you thought I might be the real Thurman Thomas. I’m not. Just a huge Thurman fan. Thurman, by the way, was a terrific pass blocker when called on and played a ton more snaps than Cook ever has. Terrific in short yardage power situations too. I'd love to see them re-sign Cook. At a reasonable price. What he's asking for is not reasonable.

First, your logic in no way follows from evidence to conclusion. Saying we should keep Cook no matter what he costs because the Bills have done well when they run a lot is like saying that eating oranges is really good and healthy for you and therefore you need to buy this particular orange right now despite the $500 price tag and the fact it’s got a huge black spot on it. Doesn’t follow. You’re right, Beane’s not stupid. Not at all. That’s why he refuses to get over-focused on something he wants and greatly overpay for it. Beane has a consistent habit of drawing the line and not going over it. It’s how he does business, and it’s smart. More, you’re very clearly showing how little you let your evidence affect your conclusions. Your prejudices are clearly visible. You say that in 2021 that when they lost to Tampa and then, according to you, they “ran more than any other team becoming the best running team in the league. They did not lose again.” That’s an extremely clear case of letting a pre-judgment deeply twist your conclusions in ways the evidence just doesn’t support. Not even close. (Just as a sidebar, pretending the evidence really does support that turning to the run caused these results, was Cook on the team then? Wait, we got these great run results with Singletary, Moss, Breida and Taiwan Jones? Well then what do we need Cook for?) Anyway, what the facts show is that when they were going according to game plans early, they passed far more often than they ran with the exception of the final game against the hapless Jets.. That’s why they had (reasonably) high run attempts. CAROLINA in the first half, 25 pass attempts, including two sacks along with 9 runs. They started off mostly passing and got way ahead and then started running more. In the first half, Up 17-8 at halftime and 25-8 by the end of the 3rd NEW ENGLAND Don’t need to spend time separating the halves. We threw 47 passes and ran 28 times in this game. ATLANTA In the first half the Bills ran 23 pass attempts including two scrambles and 12 runs (also including the scrambles). Then the second half was mostly runs. NJ JETS In this game, the Bills ran 46 passes and 33 runs. In the first half, 26 pass attempts and 14 runs, but that’s deceptive. We got the ball with 1:39 left in the half at our own 16 and ran 10 pass attempts in a row. Take out that drive and it was 16 passes and 14 runs. But again, overall 46 passes and 33 runs. Pretending that they did really well down the stretch of that season because they ran a lot? Flat-out ridiculous.

All for paying Cook if he accepts reasonable value. If he won't accept $15M per year, thanks for your hard work, James. But in any case, he'll be here this year. The problem is next year.

Nope, he's gone. Wait, we're talking September 2032, right?

Keon and Dalton didn't show up to the playoffs because both were injured pretty badly. Keon had a broken wrist and Dalton couldn't move well with his leg problems. And the idea that Beane signed Amari out of desperation is purely from your own imagination. Maybe it seemed like a good deal, and a good chance to try out a guy who might be terrific, possibly even so terrific that we'd extend his contract or sign him for another year or two. Same with the idea that Amari was responsible for the improvement. Allen started the year with one WR he'd ever worked with before and a bunch of very young guys as the keys. Being surprised it took a few weeks for them all to get on the same page is like being shocked by snow in the wintertime in Buffalo. If Amari was the reason for all that improvement, how come when he was off the field (which was a lot), there was no fall-off in performance? The correct answer? Because it wasn't "the Amari Cooper effect." It was the team starting to work together better. Cooper helped a bit, but the idea that he was the one behind all the improvement is flat-out ridiculous. Wrong question. It just is. The question is this: Is there an NFL team with a weaker passing game than the Bills? The answer is nearly all of them. It's been said before a million times, most recently by Beane, but a million times before that. The goal in football is to have the best team. Not the best wide receiver group.