Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Who the ***** cares what you think. You cant handle reality. Cause you a maga B word.
  3. I wish I could give you an answer. I don’t trust Washington republicans to get anything right. I just prefer their brand of ineptitude to that of Washington democrats. I do know that the fear mongering from the dems is standard issue. Republicans want to kill children and make old people choose between cat food and medicine, blah, blah. Been playing that tune for decades. I don’t know how anyone still buys it.
  4. Straight to hell for all of you who are advocating for this.
  5. You asked me to name the subject. You can name it.
  6. You know how it works — what goes around always comes back around.
  7. @BillsFanNC VPN is getting quite the workout tonight. His bots are all over the place.
  8. My discussion is sincere. The issue is your lack of reading comprehension and dragging this topic into an entirely unrelated thread. So as cute as you might think you are, you're just another filthy piece of *****.
  9. Curious on your thoughts on this bill. What are the positives? I can’t weed through all the “millions will lose healthcare” (which is horrifying if it’s not done with precision to only remove those who are abusing the system) rhetoric so I’m interested in learning what the positive is? Tax free OT? Seems lame. No tax on tips? Sounds like it was written by someone who never worked for tips. Not being argumentative; honestly curious what the pros are to the bill from someone on the other side of the aisle I respect.
  10. Disclaimer: I have no clue who (if either) is the righteous party in this case. But how many times has Hairston been sued similarly by over 20 women? If and when that becomes the case (or as other info is made public) my thoughts on this suit will differ - as they did with Watson. "Because he plays for another team" is completely irrelevant to me, not sure why you made that point.
  11. True word. If we’d had Higgins or Chase types, we’d have a Lombardi by now.
  12. You are seriously citing what that witch said? You libs 🤣
  13. Today
  14. Every NFL team passed on Tom Brady at least five times through like 190 pics lol All those GMS must be fired lol there was a purge of dog Whaley and the entire scouting staff, but then a lot of the scouts were brought back over the next four six weeks For 60 plus years in the bills history our problem typically has not been The scouting department it's been elsewhere The scouts aren't the guys making the pics
  15. What say you RundyMao? Quack? Billsfuk.c? Nevermind..... don't care!
  16. All reliable enough for Finding! NEW: Report via @CIADirector Ratcliffe •Concludes that in 2016 then CIA Director Brennan and others rushed the Russia election interference intelligence assessment •Brennan dismissed high level warnings that the Clinton campaign opposition research the “Steele dossier” did not meet intel collection standards + risked “credibility” •Handling of dossier was highly irregular + limited analytic rigor •Media leaks reinforced narrative "with high confidence" that Russia intervened to help candidate Trump Pg. 4 "...two senior leaders of the CIA mission center responsible for Russia—strongly opposed including the Dossier, asserting that it did not meet even the most basic tradecraft standards." NOTE: Basic Tradecraft Standards means established collection methods, techniques and operations. Pg. 5 "Brennan showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness....Brennan ultimately formalized his position in writing, stating that “my bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report." Worth reading full 8 pages 👇 cia.gov/static/Tradecr…
  17. What it seems you're implying is they didn't investigate the incident or found something but didn't care, just because of need and talent. I'm saying they must have thoroughly investigated it because they were planning on using a lot of resources and because of what happened with Araiza and found nothing of merit, so they went ahead and drafted him.
  18. I did, at least generally, and from what I saw I think the jury got that one right too. (DUI conviction but acquitted of murder/manslaughter)
  19. Hah! I have no need for store-bought tomatoes until mid-October. I just picked the first ripe ones of the year.
  20. speaking as the alleged victim here if the person who assaulted you had no assets and her recourse was civil not criminal liability (which is a lower standard of proof) are you saying there is a statute of limitations on such suits? She waited until he had some money. If he is guilty he can be used up to now obviously. If money is her solace then money she may or may not even get like I said above. film at 11 wait and see The whole thing stinks. from the alleged assault to now it coming home to roost as he joins our team Isn't that just perfect SMH
  21. You're overdue for your booster.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...