Wacka Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Actually this story was both on CNN and Dallas Morning News. And as it turns out the project is illegal, Palin can't take the money, according to her PAC. However, don't worry, the PAC outlined what needs to be done so she CAN take the money. Hey if the right doesn't like having to hear about sniveling, lying, hypocritcal wingnuts who they've annointed their hope and future...then pick someone better! Why don't you worry about the the illegal antics of people who can directly affect the country? How about murder (Ted Kennedy), racism (Byrd), tax dodgers (Rangle, half of Obama's administration) , payoffs (Dodd and Franks)? Oh right, they are dems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Why don't you worry about the the illegal antics of people who can directly affect the country? How about murder (Ted Kennedy), racism (Byrd), tax dodgers (Rangle, half of Obama's administration) , payoffs (Dodd and Franks)?Oh right, they are dems. Because she[it?] is a random computer generated remark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Because she[it?] is a random computer generated remark. Yeah, but so is Wacka. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted April 9, 2009 Share Posted April 9, 2009 Actually this story was both on CNN and Dallas Morning News. And as it turns out the project is illegal, Palin can't take the money, according to her PAC. However, don't worry, the PAC outlined what needs to be done so she CAN take the money. Hey if the right doesn't like having to hear about sniveling, lying, hypocritcal wingnuts who they've annointed their hope and future...then pick someone better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Hedd Posted April 10, 2009 Author Share Posted April 10, 2009 Oh the all so predictable responses from DC Tom..."who cares", "Why is anyone responding to this", etc etc, etc as he fills up ten posts here. Too fukin much! No Tom you aren't a conservative, or a liberal. What you are is an !@#$...can't take everything away from you. Anyhows Sarah P knows what she is doing, befitting someone who takes the old axiom that all publicity is good publicity to heart. How else to explain her using the State of Alaska's letterhead to denounce the father of her grandchild, wotta kunt! But you still get the same old batty right wing mindless crap here that the libs are picking on her, why don't they leave her alone because her family is hot or some such crap. Sarah Pallin isn't ugly, but as far as batty right wing conservative broads go she's no Dana Perrino. What the equivelent for Sarah Palin would be in terms of looks would be Peggy Hill from the Fox animated series King of the Hill.....except Palin is far more of a cartoon caricature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Holy crap. I can not believe the obsession some of you have with Sarah Palin. Did you all just run out of Dan Quayle material? Jesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Hedd Posted April 10, 2009 Author Share Posted April 10, 2009 Holy crap. I can not believe the obsession some of you have with Sarah Palin. Did you all just run out of Dan Quayle material?Jesus.Quayle was never considered the hope of the republic party, nor was he ever the publicity whore Sarah is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Quayle was never considered the hope of the republic party, nor was he ever the publicity whore Sarah is. The only people who think Sarah Palin is the hope of the Republican party are the liberals who simply can not stop their obsession with her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 10, 2009 Share Posted April 10, 2009 Oh the all so predictable responses from DC Tom..."who cares", "Why is anyone responding to this", etc etc, etc as he fills up ten posts here. Too fukin much! No Tom you aren't a conservative, or a liberal. What you are is an !@#$...can't take everything away from you. Who cares? Anyhows Sarah P knows what she is doing, befitting someone who takes the old axiom that all publicity is good publicity to heart. How else to explain her using the State of Alaska's letterhead to denounce the father of her grandchild, wotta kunt!But you still get the same old batty right wing mindless crap here that the libs are picking on her, why don't they leave her alone because her family is hot or some such crap. Sarah Pallin isn't ugly, but as far as batty right wing conservative broads go she's no Dana Perrino. What the equivelent for Sarah Palin would be in terms of looks would be Peggy Hill from the Fox animated series King of the Hill.....except Palin is far more of a cartoon caricature. Why do you care? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 They are terrified that if she runs in 2012, she'll win. If she was such an idiot as they say, they would encourage us to support her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 They are terrified that if she runs in 2012, she'll win. If she was such an idiot as they say, they would encourage us to support her. I'd bet you any amount of money the vast majority of lefties want her to run. She is by far the favorite choice of the Democrats to win the nomination. Everyone I have ever asked said the same thing, they would love if she is the face of the Republican party and if she ran and won the nomination in 2012. Because they think she has zero chance of winning the Presidency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 I'd bet you any amount of money the vast majority of lefties want her to run. She is by far the favorite choice of the Democrats to win the nomination. Everyone I have ever asked said the same thing, they would love if she is the face of the Republican party and if she ran and won the nomination in 2012. Because they think she has zero chance of winning the Presidency. And I'm supposed to believe you, who thinks the Mesiah is doing a great job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 They are terrified that if she runs in 2012, she'll win. If she was such an idiot as they say, they would encourage us to support her. Oh yeah. Run, Sarah, run. PLEASE! hahahahahahahhahahahhahahahaha And what the heck, pick Quayle as your running mate. Then, put on a helmet and ride in a tank! While shooting wolves from the tank, winking and saying You BETcha! ahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaaaaaahahahahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 And I'm supposed to believe you, who thinks the Mesiah is doing a great job? In almost every poll there is, two out of every three people think he's doing a good or great job. What until things start to go well for him. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/ot...roval-1044.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 They are terrified that if she runs in 2012, she'll win. If she was such an idiot as they say, they would encourage us to support her. Are you high? Even if she were far and away the best person on the planet for the position, the simple fact of the overall perception of her after the '08 election is enough to sink any future she could have outside of Alaska. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Are you high? Even if she were far and away the best person on the planet for the position, the simple fact of the overall perception of her after the '08 election is enough to sink any future she could have outside of Alaska. You're asking Wacka if it is high? Are you high? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 Democrats had an obsession with the smoking HOT Bush twins and now the Democrats have an obsession with the smoking HOT Palin women. When you have hideously ugly Chelsea Clinton and female wrestler Michelle Obama in your party, obviously you look to the Republican women for lust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 I forgot to mention buck-toothed, flat-chested, shrivel-skin Caroline "um, uh, you know" Kennedy. Another brutally ugly woman Democrat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 I forgot to mention buck-toothed, flat-chested, shrivel-skin Caroline "um, uh, you know" Kennedy. Another brutally ugly woman Democrat. And I am sure you, and all the other wingnuts here, are pure paragons of beauty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 You do have to admit that the well known conservative women are a lot better looking than the liberal ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts