gobills404 Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, LDD said: BS...a baby born here is a US citizen. Yeah which is why it should be changed 1 hour ago, LDD said: There's a lot to talk about with immigration but where should this child go? To where their parents came from along with their parents. I’m just tryna keep families together. 1 hour ago, LDD said: Let me guess, you're pro-life?? No. People raising children they either can’t or don’t want to provide for is what causes dysfunctional adults that are allowed to vote. 1 hour ago, LDD said: What else would you like to change in the Constitution? Abolish the 16th. Any other questions? Edited 22 hours ago by gobills404 1 1
LDD Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 34 minutes ago, gobills404 said: Yeah which is why it should be changed To where their parents came from along with their parents. I’m just tryna keep families together. No. People raising children they either can’t or don’t want to provide for is what causes dysfunctional adults that are allowed to vote. Abolish the 16th. Any other questions? Fair enough, I disagree. It was written into the Constitution for a reason and we should not get into “abolishing” parts of the Constitution on a whim. one more question… What did those babies do to you? 1 1
gobills404 Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 10 minutes ago, LDD said: What did those babies do to you? Nothing. But their parents use them as a loophole to abuse our immigration system. I want to close the loophole. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago Virginia is just better. Even with an R governor. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/virginia-snap-substitute-roll-weekly-192527215.html 1
Andy1 Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 29 minutes ago, JFKjr said: And what a majority needs to do is sweeten the bill to force 7 Dems to vote for it to pass it. That’s how politics works. It’s not clear what the off ramp is for either party now. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 55 minutes ago, LDD said: Fair enough, I disagree. It was written into the Constitution for a reason and we should not get into “abolishing” parts of the Constitution on a whim. one more question… What did those babies do to you? If there is one thing I would like to change about our courts is the reference to previous decisions that were made poorly or based on obviously incorrect interpretations. The amendment clearly states "under the jurisdiction" which means while following the laws. If someone is here illegally, then not following the laws. At this point though we would need to modify the Constitution because legally the anyone born here is a citizen thing is the law. 1
SCBills Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago One notable thing I’m seeing on social media is a lot of black dudes roasting black women for having their EBT/Snap cut off. This issue doesn’t seem to be generating a high level of sympathy from anyone. 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 10 minutes ago, SCBills said: One notable thing I’m seeing on social media is a lot of black dudes roasting black women for having their EBT/Snap cut off. This issue doesn’t seem to be generating a high level of sympathy from anyone. People haven’t started starving yet. Biz is really up at our local foodbank Hurray! 1
SCBills Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: People haven’t started starving yet. Biz is really up at our local foodbank Hurray! I’m for a societal safety net. I’m also against that safety net being abused. And no, honestly, I don’t care how much tax dollars go to Snap/EBT compared to the Military or whatever leftists want to respond with.. watching people openly abuse the system, gloat about it for years and now threaten people if they don’t get their money is beyond radicalizing on this issue. 1 1
Hank II Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 52 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: If there is one thing I would like to change about our courts is the reference to previous decisions that were made poorly or based on obviously incorrect interpretations. The amendment clearly states "under the jurisdiction" which means while following the laws. If someone is here illegally, then not following the laws. At this point though we would need to modify the Constitution because legally the anyone born here is a citizen thing is the law. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the purpose of the amendment to protect the babies of parents who were brought here against their will to be slaves? These are different times. 2
Wolfgang Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 31 minutes ago, Hank II said: Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the purpose of the amendment to protect the babies of parents who were brought here against their will to be slaves? These are different times. You are 100% correct...
Andy1 Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago If everyone is so hot on changing birthright citizenship, then follow the Constitutional amendment process and see if it can be done. Get 2/3 majority in house and senate or approval through constitutional convention.
sherpa Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 9 hours ago, gobills404 said: Nothing. But their parents use them as a loophole to abuse our immigration system. I want to close the loophole. That is exactly how it works. For about ten years I would go to South America for work, once per week. We always arrived back at about 7AM in Miami along with many other flights from the region. We would constantly see pregnant women entering with proper visas at Immigration. You get to Know some of the Immigration guys doing this so often and they would often lament on the scores of people who did this, including violating their visitors visas to stay in until the child was born. They would often say "She's never leaving," as one of these would walk by or be in an adjoining line. People who don't travel for a living to that region have no idea what a formal industry this is. 2
LDD Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 10 hours ago, gobills404 said: Nothing. But their parents use them as a loophole to abuse our immigration system. I want to close the loophole. By taking it out on the kid? IMO that's what you would be doing. The parents can leave with the kid but the kid is an American citizen. Some people abuse the 2nd amendment too, do we need to change that as well?
LDD Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 2 minutes ago, gobills404 said: Learn how to read No because at least those people are Americans and not invaders Oh man, well, the "kid" is as American as you bud. My inference was that we could change the immigration law that allows the parents to stay and they can make the decision to take their little American home or leave him or her here. We're the most powerful and the richest country the world has ever seen. We ought to be able to take care of our own citizens. We're not gonna burn down the Constitution because you don't think something is fair. 1
gobills404 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, LDD said: Oh man, well, the "kid" is as American as you bud. “An anchor baby born from invaders is just as American as someone who’s ancestors have been here since the 1600s” I actually have no words 5 minutes ago, LDD said: We're not gonna burn down the Constitution because you don't think something is fair. The constitution has 27 amendments but apparently one more would be “burning it down”? Lol. 1
teef Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) i'm not gonna lie...i for some reason kick out of the ebt tik toks where after getting their benefits, families record themselves buying pallets of total garbage. there's usually a little dance involved too. i'll miss it. Edited 11 hours ago by teef
Recommended Posts