Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

I can post however I want.  Again, you're sounding like Billstime/Roundy, who I'd bet have actually tried to report me for ignoring them. 😂

 

And I likely would chill and have a beer with both of you, or maybe I'd find you both to be actual morons.

 

But we'll never know.

 

 

 

Triggered!

 

😂

 

Jauronimo shows up down here once in a blue moon. Sometimes I remind him of his moronic posts, and it wasn't just the trans stuff, sometimes I don't. 

 

Sounds like you're a bit triggered because I called out your buddy.

 

Don't worry I'm sure that Jauronimo, despite being a moron, will be just fine.


Respectfully, I don’t have ANYONE on ignore from this side of the site. 
 

The only one on my ignore list is Pine Barrens Mafia because I’m convinced he openly hates the Bills. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, SCBills said:


You can’t really start a post with “the fact that…” and then state “apparently”, followed by a bunch of assumptions. 

 

You can when you're hellbent on twisting yourself into a pretzel of absurdity 

Edited by BillsFanNC
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:


 

What is that?  AI?  Are you serious?


Coming from someone who just posted from Libs of TikTok. 

Get real, man.

Nothing I could possibly post -- including a question asked of a large language model belonging to Elon Musk himself -- will dissuade you of what you've already decided: that the big, bad, radical left is to blame.

Groypers can come right out and say "this guy looks like one of ours", and we can see pictures of the shooter himself dressing up as a Groyper meme for Halloween, and you'll still dismiss it and blame democrats.

Your mind is made up. That's fine. To each their own.

Posted
5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

 Been here since 2002. Got a year on ya.

 

 

i was here in 01 but forgot my log in or never used it came back in 03, fwiw.

3 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Respectfully, I don’t have ANYONE on ignore from this side of the site. 
 

The only one on my ignore list is Pine Barrens Mafia because I’m convinced he openly hates the Bills. 

you need to meet him. he is one of the funniest people in his misery with the Bills. just as much energy as you'd believe in person. he and Mr rags are cut from the ame cloth.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, SCBills said:

The cope on the left is insane.  
 

Honestly headache inducing reading these posts. 
 

The simplest explanation is usually the correct explanation.   He was a radicalized, weirdo gamer who clearly had turned towards some leftist viewpoints as evidenced by gamer/furry writings, alongside regurgitating antifascist commentary and his family stating he had recently said that Charlie Kirk is full of hate. 
 

Even Hasan Piker of all people posted that this looks to be of a confused/leftist shooter, not fitting far right shooter archetypes. 
 

Yet the large leftist propaganda accounts are straight up lying about him being a registered Republican (yes, that’s a provable lie) and going Blue Anon to “well ackshually” his gamer infatuation = Nick Fuentes and a-ha! Nick Fuentes and Charlie Kirk didn’t like each other so he was obviously too far right and didn’t think Kirk was far right enough?  Ok….  Got it. 

 

 


The cope on THE LEFT is insane?

When mounting evidence seems to indicate that he was part of an extremist far RIGHT movement?

Sure, Jan.
 

  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Regardless of all the bickering about what side of the political aisle the guy was on, one thing is certain, he was not on Charlie Kirk’s side…And Kirk was a leader in the conservative movement.

 

So make of that what you will…

 

Conservatives may disagree on a few things, but their core values are the same- and it does not include silencing free speech, which is the bedrock of our democracy…

 

So, if you are against that, you are anti conservative/foundational values.

It’s hard to rationalize that with Clay Higgins today and trying to revoke visas for peaceful protestors,  

Posted
5 minutes ago, SCBills said:

The cope on the left is insane.  
 

Honestly headache inducing reading these posts. 
 

The simplest explanation is usually the correct explanation.   He was a radicalized, weirdo gamer who clearly had turned towards some leftist viewpoints as evidenced by gamer/furry writings, alongside regurgitating antifascist commentary and his family stating he had recently said that Charlie Kirk is full of hate. 
 

Even Hasan Piker of all people posted that this looks to be of a confused/leftist shooter, not fitting far right shooter archetypes. 
 

Yet the large leftist propaganda accounts are straight up lying about him being a registered Republican (yes, that’s a provable lie) and going Blue Anon to “well ackshually” his gamer infatuation = Nick Fuentes and a-ha! Nick Fuentes and Charlie Kirk didn’t like each other so he was obviously too far right and didn’t think Kirk was far right enough?  Ok….  Got it. 

 

 

 

 

Doesn't matter what affiliation this guy has/had.   The other side was always gonna spin it just enough to create doubt amongst their followers.    They successfully got some people to believe that the Butler, Pa attack was a Trump supporter too.

Posted
2 minutes ago, muppy said:

where have you been? Steering clear of PPP ? I don't blame you. honestly  What a horrible tragic mess. 

 

I wont be quieted by rabid few hateful individuals so no worries Im good.

I'll see you around

Best to you.m

I’ve been around Mup, just not necessarily wanting to get into the weeds on this.  
 

Horrible, tragic mess indeed.  

Posted
33 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said:

You're changing topics now? I'm saying I wouldn't label them as Antifa unless they are active in those communities, or write some sort of manifesto claiming that. Sheesh.

 

I'm not changing topics, I pointed out a specific group you brought up.  I think the narrative needs to change don't you think?  Conservative white people need to be afraid of transgender people, they are literally murdering them and their children.  

 

I guess my confusion is we both agree the rhetoric is the danger but we can't have any label, even if it has the same rhetoric.  

Posted
Just now, Logic said:


The cope on THE LEFT is insane?

When mounting evidence seems to indicate that he was part of an extremist far RIGHT movement?

Sure, Jan.
 

Does it matter?  He’s apparently a lone wolf.  It’s not like the Mormons shot Kirk.  There’s crazies on both sides and both fringes, and they’ve each done wrong.  It’s gotta stop. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Yobogoya! said:

People in this thread be acting like the guy who took a shot at Reagan didn’t do it because he thought it would make Jodi Foster fall in love with him. 
 

This kid is nothing but disturbed. Doesn’t matter if he fired the bullet in service to Trump, Marx or Kaiser Pepe the Frog. 

Yep, pretty common modern story. Socially awkward kid spends too much time isolated or online at the very same time his mental illness begins to emerge.  Almost every one of our high profile shooters fits this bill and it really has nothing to do with political ideology.

Posted
9 minutes ago, muppy said:

double posted Leo. Points well taken.

I was at a car dealership, having my Lambo detailed, and hit submit and it didn’t submit.  So, I hit it again….and again…and maybe again.   
 

And yes, by Lambo I mean Honda, and by detailed I mean oil change.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Logic said:


Coming from someone who just posted from Libs of TikTok. 

Get real, man.

Nothing I could possibly post -- including a question asked of a large language model belonging to Elon Musk himself -- will dissuade you of what you've already decided: that the big, bad, radical left is to blame.

Groypers can come right out and say "this guy looks like one of ours", and we can see pictures of the shooter himself dressing up as a Groyper meme for Halloween, and you'll still dismiss it and blame democrats.

Your mind is made up. That's fine. To each their own.

in his defense, AI is just a collective of the most popular information on the internet.

 

AI, Gemini, which you used believes that Obama was the first endorsed candidate to get nominated to openly support gay marriage. he was not. after further discussions it admitted that he only approved same sex unions in 2012 and declined a position in 2008. it then said jessie jackson was the first in the 80's, but he was not a nomimee. then it said kamala harris was in 2012, but then admited she was not a nominee. then i kept pressing to have it say Biden was and came out in 2020 as in support of gay marriage, which was true. however, it took direct questioning that trump openly supported it from first announcing his candidacy through his election that he was the only one to have done that to that point. ai then refused to acknowledge he was pro gay marriage because trump does not believe in gay marriage. which it refuted itself on when saying that personal viewpoint is not a political viewpoint.

 

so...yeah, AI needs work.

Posted
1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

Does it matter?  He’s apparently a lone wolf.  It’s not like the Mormons shot Kirk.  There’s crazies on both sides and both fringes, and they’ve each done wrong.  It’s gotta stop. 


It matters only insofar as there are a ton of republican politicians pinning this on the radical left, including our president.

If we all agree that "it's gotta stop", and the "it" in question is political violence, then the president going on TV and blaming "the radical left" for Kirk's shooting BEFORE ANYONE WAS EVEN APPREHENDED" doesn't seem like the best move, does it? It doesn't scream "de-escalation and lowering tensions", does it?

So I agree that a sick person is a sick person regardless of his political or ideological affiliation. But if repbulicans are gonna go on TV and make frothy-mouthed claims about the evil left, then well...yes, it does seem to be important to ascertain whether that's even true.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Logic said:


The cope on THE LEFT is insane?

When mounting evidence seems to indicate that he was part of an extremist far RIGHT movement?

Sure, Jan.
 

 

Let's grant you your insane conclusion that this was a guy driven to do this by right wing ideology.

 

That doesn't change the fact that the celebratory glee at cold blooded murder is exclusively coming from the left.

 

Or do you want to twist yourself into another pretzel on that too?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Logic said:


Coming from someone who just posted from Libs of TikTok. 

Get real, man.

Nothing I could possibly post -- including a question asked of a large language model belonging to Elon Musk himself -- will dissuade you of what you've already decided: that the big, bad, radical left is to blame.

Groypers can come right out and say "this guy looks like one of ours", and we can see pictures of the shooter himself dressing up as a Groyper meme for Halloween, and you'll still dismiss it and blame democrats.

Your mind is made up. That's fine. To each their own.


 

Im posting actual facts from the authorities. 
 

Doesn’t matter what account shared them.  
 

Sure he could be a neo nazi that shot a “Nazi”

 

Absolutely 

Posted
Just now, BillsFanNC said:

 

Let's grant you your insane conclusion that this was a guy driven to do this by right wing ideology.

 

That doesn't change the fact that the celebratory glee at cold blooded murder is exclusively coming from the left.

 

Or do you want to twist yourself into another pretzel on that too?


nah, we out here celebrating. don’t get it twisted.

×
×
  • Create New...