Charlie Kirk Assassin Tyler Robinson. Death Penalty Case. Kash Says >20 Under Investigation

[SectionC3]

10 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

You cannot be serious 

Put a finger on it. 

[Yobogoya!]

52 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Hopefully it changes the harmful rhetoric the msm media uses to push these kids to do terrible things!

 

You can't say Trump is Hitler and conservatives are evil and then state what you wrote.

 

Considering events like this one have always been the intended outcome from people who use that type of rhetoric, I'm going to guess no- it isn't likely to change anything. 

 

I'd like to be wrong. 

[ALLinALLEN]

1 minute ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

I'm going to believe that Charlie Kirk wasn't killed by a video game addict.  I'm going to believe since he was a Right Wing Political Activist, he was politically assassinated and that it relates to the ANTIFA phrase.  That seems obvious to me and I think it does to you too.  Which would the dots connect to?

From the details coming out about the family, he grew up in a deeply republican family, who loved guns (father was law enforcement 20+ years), religious, educated. He was smart (saw a pic he was a 4.0 student), went to college, probably started to have experiences and conversations that challenged his ultra conservative home he grew up in. He probably began to differ from his family's beliefs which further confused him. He then sees a character like Kirk as someone who was further promoting said topics he doesnt agree with. Then he acts, horribly, and commits an atrocity he seems fit.

 

It doesnt mean he's ANTIFA or whatever. He was a crazy person that we all can agree was just evil. Not part of some "movement". 

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

7 minutes ago, Max Fischer said:

 

Well, anyway . . . 

According to lefties, he had a stroke yesterday. The fact that he's speaking at all is a miracle.

[BillsFanNC]

3 minutes ago, Max Fischer said:

 

So you are either saying all trans people are groomers or all groomers are trans.

 

 

Strawman alert!

 

Saying that you shouldn't sexualize children in ANY way isn't saying that all trans people are attempting to sexualize children.

 

I'd say that you already knew that, but your demoralized mind doesn't allow for it.

 

Why did you conveniently ignore the part where I said that children shouldn't be exposed to sexualization in ANY form? Jauronimo did that too. Weird.

 

Surely you can find numerous video examples where six year old boys are feeling up strippers from the Sundowner, right?

 

3 minutes ago, Max Fischer said:

 

 

Of course, only a warped, hate-filled mind would believe any of that. There is NO evidence to back up that Trans people are any more sexually attracted to children than the general population.  You know, like Trump's friend Epstein. 

 

Deflection!!

 

 

3 minutes ago, Max Fischer said:

Your pathetic mind is so addled with hate. You won't even allow your brain to process that you WANTED the shooter to be trans and now, instead of coming to grips with your prejudice, you'll mask reason by wrapping yourself in the comfort of lies of those sick folks you worship online. What a loser. 

 

Lol. You did a fantastic job right here of being a loser. Billstime level. Good job.

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

2 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said:

From the details coming out about the family, he grew up in a deeply republican family, who loved guns (father was law enforcement 20+ years), religious, educated. He was smart (saw a pic he was a 4.0 student), went to college, probably started to have experiences and conversations that challenged his ultra conservative home he grew up in. He probably began to differ from his family's beliefs which further confused him. He then sees a character like Kirk as someone who was further promoting said topics he doesnt agree with. Then he acts, horribly, and commits an atrocity he seems fit.

 

It doesnt mean he's ANTIFA or whatever. He was a crazy person that we all can agree was just evil. Not part of some "movement". 

He called out fascists specifically and you say he's not antifa?

[The Frankish Reich]

19 minutes ago, SCBills said:

Even Hasan Piker is hedging, when every other leftist account is desperately trying to spin this.  And, of course, leftists are mad at him in the replies. 
 

 

Horseshoe theory rears its ugly head again. Far right, far left ... who can even tell anymore? Just far out of the mainstream is all I know.

[ALLinALLEN]

5 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

He called out fascists specifically and you say he's not antifa?

 

An individual’s motive can overlap with a term without signifying membership. Unless there's credible evidence that he engaged with Antifa groups online or in person (which could still come out, then obviously I'd agree), it's more precise to describe him as an individual who carried out a violent act and happened to use anti-fascist rhetoric - not as a member of Antifa.

Edited September 12 by ALLinALLEN

[Royale with Cheese]

11 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

Groypers hated Charlie too. Doesn't mean they did it, doesn't mean it wasn't someone on the left, but the people who disliked him were not confined to the left. Also could just be a local nutjob taking advantage of a prominent person coming to their town (wouldn't be the first time).

 

Best to avoid jumping to conclusions until we learn more.

 

Yes you shouldn't jump to conclusions but sometimes that dots seem to be obviously connected.  Political people are killed for political reasons.  If this is a anomaly, it's one of those one in a million and those are low odds to me. 

Just now, ALLinALLEN said:

 

An individual’s motive can overlap with a term without signifying membership. Unless there's credible evidence that he engaged with Antifa groups online or in person (which could still come out, then obviously I'd agree), it's more precise to describe him as an individual who carried out a violent act and happened to use anti-fascist rhetoric - not as a member or Antifa.

 

To me it doesn't matter member or not.  The rhetoric is the most dangerous part because they create "rogue militias".

[BillsFanNC]

Well Max was right. Writing a song about converting your children definitely means that nobody in the LGBTQ community is trying to convert your children.

 

Irrefutable evidence, so I'm forced to concede.

 

 

[sherpa]

50 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

No, is Trump a scum bag for giving aid and comfort to a convicted child trafficker? 

 

I think its sad and kind of nauseating,( sickening really! ) that you ignore such a simple question. It shows the level of political indoctrination and raw bias you have. 

 

Trump gave a convicted predator of children aid and comfort, yet you hold back comment

 

 

 

It isn't sad. 

You are an idiot who doesn't seem to understand that I am not interested in replying to you statements that are not proven.

I didn't vote for the guy.

I have no responsibility to you to answer any of your claims that have not been proven as fact.

 

Further, I have no "political indoctrination" nor "raw bias."

None whatsoever.

 

You are clearly ignorant of the subject at hand, and trying to change to that to your unproven accusation doesn't interest me.

[Homelander]

13 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said:

From the details coming out about the family, he grew up in a deeply republican family, who loved guns (father was law enforcement 20+ years), religious, educated. He was smart (saw a pic he was a 4.0 student), went to college, probably started to have experiences and conversations that challenged his ultra conservative home he grew up in. He probably began to differ from his family's beliefs which further confused him. He then sees a character like Kirk as someone who was further promoting said topics he doesnt agree with. Then he acts, horribly, and commits an atrocity he seems fit.

 

It doesnt mean he's ANTIFA or whatever. He was a crazy person that we all can agree was just evil. Not part of some "movement". 

 

Bottom line: not transgender, not a Democrat, not an immigrant yet MAGA-sphere couldn’t resist spinning their usual lies from second one.

 

After every school shooting, they say ‘hold on, let the facts come out.’

 

But when the king of bigotry dies, suddenly his life matters more than the kids at school.

 

Edited September 12 by Homelander

[ChiGoose]

7 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said:

Not part of some "movement". 

 

I would not necessarily agree with this at this point. 

 

A lot of the people who end up being described as "lone wolves" belonged to fringe online communities. They often talked about their plans to do violence, or were even encouraged to do those acts. We just write them off as lone wolves because things like True Crime Community, Zizians, groypers, or 8chaners don't fit popular narratives. 

[ALLinALLEN]

3 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

Yes you shouldn't jump to conclusions but sometimes that dots seem to be obviously connected.  Political people are killed for political reasons.  If this is a anomaly, it's one of those one in a million and those are low odds to me. 

 

To me it doesn't matter member or not.  The rhetoric is the most dangerous part because they create "rogue militias".

Well yeah, I agree the rhetoric is the real danger. Whether someone claims the far-right, far-left, or no group at all, violent language can still push lone actors to act. That’s why I think it’s more important to call out and reduce the toxic messaging—no matter which side it comes from—than to argue over labels like ‘Antifa. It's meaningless.

[The Frankish Reich]

9 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

According to lefties, he had a stroke yesterday. The fact that he's speaking at all is a miracle.

In other words: according to some observers, he has exhibited signs of having had transient ischemic attacks, a/k/a "mini-strokes." Quite a different thing than a massive stroke that leads to permanent or long-lasting speech problems.

[ALLinALLEN]

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

 

I would not necessarily agree with this at this point. 

 

A lot of the people who end up being described as "lone wolves" belonged to fringe online communities. They often talked about their plans to do violence, or were even encouraged to do those acts. We just write them off as lone wolves because things like True Crime Community, Zizians, groypers, or 8chaners don't fit popular narratives. 

Has this come out yet? I haven't seen anything on this.

[BillsFanNC]

Hey fifth grader in health class, how many times is too many times to mas.tu.r.bate in a day?

 

(I'll point out that mas.tu.r.bate requires a filter here, but it's a-ok for 5th graders!)

 

I'm glad Max proved me wrong. I now see the error in my ways.

 

 

 

 

Edited September 12 by BillsFanNC

[Max Fischer]

4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Well Max was right. Writing a song about converting your children definitely means that nobody in the LGBTQ community is trying to convert your children.

 

Irrefutable evidence, so I'm forced to concede.

 

 

 

You are doing a lot to convince us that you are obsessed with grooming children. You're one creepy guy(?)

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said:

In other words: according to some observers, he has exhibited signs of having had transient ischemic attacks, a/k/a "mini-strokes." Quite a different thing than a massive stroke that leads to permanent or long-lasting speech problems.

Sure.

[BillsFanNC]

2 minutes ago, Max Fischer said:

 

You are doing a lot to convince us that you are obsessed with grooming children. You're one creepy guy(?)

 

That's the best you can do?

 

Weak.

 

😂