Roundybout Posted September 11 Posted September 11 7 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: ⬆️ We know. We saw it when Paul Pelosi was attacked. 1 1 1
Royale with Cheese Posted September 11 Posted September 11 21 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: There is no evidence that poor white people are less violent than Black people in similar socioeconomic circumstances The rate of violent victimization for poor individuals is comparable across racial groups and is primarily linked to neighborhood conditions rather than race itself. not sure where you’re getting the 30 times more likely stat? Maybe Twitter? I definitely think there is. The black homicide rate is nearly 4 times higher than the national average. 26.6 per 100,000....that's just homicide. The number one cause of death for the black community ages 18-29 in homicide. Vast majority from other black people. The number one cause of death for the white community 18-29 is car accidents. I got that stat from another podcaster who put up a graph from a government site. It wasn't Kirk. 2
Royale with Cheese Posted September 11 Posted September 11 11 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Your link is data from July whereas my story used JOLT data published this month. Rural vs. urban matters because they’re different environments. Rural environments are more geared towards independent living whereas urban environments foster the gang culture and territories. You're not really being obtuse about this are you? You think the job market landscape has dramatically shifted in 60 days or something? Am I lying about how many openings my company has right now? As in 9/11/2025? Linkedin itself has 4 million openings and that is just one platform. https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/search/?currentJobId=4299423192 LOL, there's gangs everywhere. They're in rural areas too. Are you always the victim? https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/jr000251b.pdf
boyst Posted September 11 Posted September 11 Have successfully reached out to many buildings/etc with flags at half stalf to fly at half. Private flags do not have to but any federal building, including post office, must do so.
Roundybout Posted September 11 Posted September 11 4 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: You're not really being obtuse about this are you? You think the job market landscape has dramatically shifted in 60 days or something? Am I lying about how many openings my company has right now? As in 9/11/2025? Linkedin itself has 4 million openings and that is just one platform. https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/search/?currentJobId=4299423192 LOL, there's gangs everywhere. They're in rural areas too. Are you always the victim? https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/jr000251b.pdf So is the report I cited wrong? How? There were 7.18 million job openings and 7.24 million unemployed people. This is the governments own data. Respectfully, your own position does not represent the entire nation. https://mises.org/power-market/us-now-has-more-unemployed-people-job-openings To the gang bit, did you read that article? It was interesting. It also said that rural gangs are not formed from the same cloth as urban gangs.
JFKjr Posted September 11 Posted September 11 (edited) 54 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Is it not possible this is an assassin from a foreign entity to bring the country to its knees? Is this too offensive of a possibility since we have no clue who did this? Seems more reasonable than declaring war on liberals. I think you're exactly on the right track here for a number of reasons: 1. The shooter had access to the roof. People familiar with the campus and its buildings say there would be NO access to the roof from the inside without getting an official person to unlock it for you, if you're authorized to be up there. Of course you could access it externally with some help and secrecy, which would involve a bit of pre-planning. 2. A suspicious plane left the Provo airport within an hour of the shooting, it illegally turned off its radar transponder (whatever they call it), and returned an hour later. 3. There were several people within the crowd who appeared to be serving as decoys/distractions. 4. There were several people on the ground who appeared to be giving odd signals. 5. It would be easy enough for a 'crazy' person to simply shoot him straight up from the crowd. This has the appearances of a targeted hit. So I don't think the political left was responsible for it. They are responsible for their reactions to it though. Edited September 11 by JFKjr 1 1
Royale with Cheese Posted September 11 Posted September 11 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: So is the report I cited wrong? How? There were 7.18 million job openings and 7.24 million unemployed people. This is the governments own data. Respectfully, your own position does not represent the entire nation. https://mises.org/power-market/us-now-has-more-unemployed-people-job-openings To the gang bit, did you read that article? It was interesting. It also said that rural gangs are not formed from the same cloth as urban gangs. I listed the Bureau of Labor statistics and you invalidated it because it was 2 months ago lol. That is directly from the government. Did you know that those statistics don't include retirees or spouses that don't have to work like stay at home parents? I know my company doesn't represent the whole nation which is why I provided the BLS and Linkedin report. I have the pulse of the hiring market much more than you do. I directly am involved in it. We are so strapped for talent in certain areas where we are hiring people from other countries because there isn't enough of that skill set here. We have positions open for over a year because we can't find that specific talent. US Staffing Firms are a 200 BILLION industry. Billion with a B. How are they making so much money when there isn't jobs? I have been doing this for 15 years. You don't know what you're talking about.
Roundybout Posted September 11 Posted September 11 10 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: I listed the Bureau of Labor statistics and you invalidated it because it was 2 months ago lol. That is directly from the government. Did you know that those statistics don't include retirees or spouses that don't have to work like stay at home parents? I know my company doesn't represent the whole nation which is why I provided the BLS and Linkedin report. I have the pulse of the hiring market much more than you do. I directly am involved in it. We are so strapped for talent in certain areas where we are hiring people from other countries because there isn't enough of that skill set here. We have positions open for over a year because we can't find that specific talent. US Staffing Firms are a 200 BILLION industry. Billion with a B. How are they making so much money when there isn't jobs? I have been doing this for 15 years. You don't know what you're talking about. Again, no disrespect, but nothing you posted disproves the report I linked twice.
Royale with Cheese Posted September 11 Posted September 11 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Again, no disrespect, but nothing you posted disproves the report I linked twice. That does not include retirees or stay at home parents. That completely changes that data....you know that right? I posted a link to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, directly from the government, but it goes against your narrative. Okay here. Released just a few days ago with the same data. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf "Total nonfarm payroll employment changed little in August (+22,000) and has shown little change since April, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported today. The unemployment rate, at 4.3 percent, also changed little in August. A job gain in health care was" Again, this doesn't include retirees and stay at home parents or other reasons why they aren't working. Roughly 16% of Americans are retired and don't work. There are 11 million stay at home parents. That would be a significant shift in data and you're not going to acknowledge it. 1 minute ago, B-Man said: BACK TO THE CHARLIE KIRK THREAD. This is going to take some time to get him. 1
SectionC3 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 25 minutes ago, JFKjr said: I think you're exactly on the right track here for a number of reasons: 1. The shooter had access to the roof. People familiar with the campus and its buildings say there would be NO access to the roof from the inside without getting an official person to unlock it for you, if you're authorized to be up there. Of course you could access it externally with some help and secrecy, which would involve a bit of pre-planning. 2. A suspicious plane left the Provo airport within an hour of the shooting, it illegally turned off its radar transponder (whatever they call it), and returned an hour later. 3. There were several people within the crowd who appeared to be serving as decoys/distractions. 4. There were several people on the ground who appeared to be giving odd signals. 5. It would be easy enough for a 'crazy' person to simply shoot him straight up from the crowd. This has the appearances of a targeted hit. So I don't think the political left was responsible for it. They are responsible for their reactions to it though. I don’t wanna get into speculation, particularly when there is a victim to be mourned. But I will say that something about this strikes me as very strange and certainly very deliberate, if not professional. Thomas Crooks and Sirhan this is not. 24 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: I listed the Bureau of Labor statistics and you invalidated it because it was 2 months ago lol. That is directly from the government. Did you know that those statistics don't include retirees or spouses that don't have to work like stay at home parents? I know my company doesn't represent the whole nation which is why I provided the BLS and Linkedin report. I have the pulse of the hiring market much more than you do. I directly am involved in it. We are so strapped for talent in certain areas where we are hiring people from other countries because there isn't enough of that skill set here. We have positions open for over a year because we can't find that specific talent. US Staffing Firms are a 200 BILLION industry. Billion with a B. How are they making so much money when there isn't jobs? I have been doing this for 15 years. You don't know what you're talking about. My guess is two tiered economy. 28 minutes ago, JFKjr said: I think you're exactly on the right track here for a number of reasons: 1. The shooter had access to the roof. People familiar with the campus and its buildings say there would be NO access to the roof from the inside without getting an official person to unlock it for you, if you're authorized to be up there. Of course you could access it externally with some help and secrecy, which would involve a bit of pre-planning. 2. A suspicious plane left the Provo airport within an hour of the shooting, it illegally turned off its radar transponder (whatever they call it), and returned an hour later. 3. There were several people within the crowd who appeared to be serving as decoys/distractions. 4. There were several people on the ground who appeared to be giving odd signals. 5. It would be easy enough for a 'crazy' person to simply shoot him straight up from the crowd. This has the appearances of a targeted hit. So I don't think the political left was responsible for it. They are responsible for their reactions to it though. Agreed.
Royale with Cheese Posted September 11 Posted September 11 (edited) 17 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: My guess is two tiered economy. I spend about $600k a year on Staffing Firms for my really, really hard to fill jobs. They make that much money because companies use them all the time - because they can't find the talent for their jobs. Edited September 11 by Royale with Cheese 1
boyst Posted September 11 Posted September 11 17 minutes ago, B-Man said: BACK TO THE CHARLIE KIRK THREAD. Imagine if Harris won. The FBI would be raiding Kirks home for evidence of his hate crimes and holding a hearing that the shooter could have been her brother or son. The FBI would be labeling this as workplace violence and covering it up. 1 1
Roundybout Posted September 11 Posted September 11 15 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: I spend about $600k a year on Staffing Firms for my really, really hard to fill jobs. They make that much money because companies use them all the time - because they can't find the talent for their jobs. This supports policy of more skilled immigration to fill the jobs 24 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: That does not include retirees or stay at home parents. That completely changes that data....you know that right? I posted a link to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, directly from the government, but it goes against your narrative. Okay here. Released just a few days ago with the same data. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf "Total nonfarm payroll employment changed little in August (+22,000) and has shown little change since April, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported today. The unemployment rate, at 4.3 percent, also changed little in August. A job gain in health care was" Again, this doesn't include retirees and stay at home parents or other reasons why they aren't working. Roughly 16% of Americans are retired and don't work. There are 11 million stay at home parents. That would be a significant shift in data and you're not going to acknowledge it. This is going to take some time to get him. Yeah, but this doesn’t show the jobs available. In fact, it shows a WORSE unemployment rate than the JOLT study I linked.
nedboy7 Posted September 11 Posted September 11 48 minutes ago, JFKjr said: I think you're exactly on the right track here for a number of reasons: 1. The shooter had access to the roof. People familiar with the campus and its buildings say there would be NO access to the roof from the inside without getting an official person to unlock it for you, if you're authorized to be up there. Of course you could access it externally with some help and secrecy, which would involve a bit of pre-planning. 2. A suspicious plane left the Provo airport within an hour of the shooting, it illegally turned off its radar transponder (whatever they call it), and returned an hour later. 3. There were several people within the crowd who appeared to be serving as decoys/distractions. 4. There were several people on the ground who appeared to be giving odd signals. 5. It would be easy enough for a 'crazy' person to simply shoot him straight up from the crowd. This has the appearances of a targeted hit. So I don't think the political left was responsible for it. They are responsible for their reactions to it though. That is fair. We agree on all of it. I think no matter what the reactions from dumbasses are it’s important to not sink to their level and rise above it all. Which is hard in a such an emotionally charged divided country. 1
sherpa Posted September 11 Posted September 11 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: This supports policy of more skilled immigration to fill the jobs Which no administration has has denied. Legal immigration.
Roundybout Posted September 11 Posted September 11 Just now, sherpa said: Which no administration has has denied. Legal immigration. Kirk was routinely posting against H1B and other legal job seeking.
Royale with Cheese Posted September 11 Posted September 11 7 minutes ago, Roundybout said: This supports policy of more skilled immigration to fill the jobs Yeah, but this doesn’t show the jobs available. In fact, it shows a WORSE unemployment rate than the JOLT study I linked. I showed you the previous link with the number of jobs available and you discredited it. So I found the same data, from the same website but this one was a few weeks newer. At this point, you're being disingenuous. And you don't know what you're talking about again. What do you do for a living that gives you all this labor statistics knowledge? The reason why, specifically in heavy manufacturing, as to there are shortages is because the new generation of American's do not want to do this type of work anymore. These people are still working, but they prefer a more lighter manufacturing with temperature controlled plants, no weekends, no shift work etc..... The people are there, they just don't want to do it. 1
Recommended Posts