Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/18/2025 at 4:20 PM, letsgoteam said:

What is interesting is that growing up I really enjoyed the Colbert Report. So I was really excited when he was coming to late night. Then when I watched the show, it was awful. I knew that the Colbert Report was a "character" but I didn't realize how much that character was masking his true persona.

 

Kimmel is the same way, you cant go from the "Man Show" and then try to become a "moral compass"

As he ever come and said anything about the Man Show or tried to denounce it? I would respect him a little bit more if he had done that...

Colbert was better playing a fake conservative when the audience knew what it was getting with the Colbert Report.  I think CBS wanted Stewart but knew he didn't want the job so Colbert was the next best option as they pulled in high ratings back to back.  Especially since the audience for comedy central was younger than Letterman's.  Colbert had no background as a standup comic so I don't know what CBS was expecting.  He just went back to his bread and butter which was political satire making fun of the right.  He just wasn't funny out of character so I stopped watching within a month or so.  He had higher ratings than Kimmel and Fallon so he just stuck with it.  

 

It is funny seeing how freaked out liberals are because he was basically just a propaganda show for their party.  Maybe the show just sucked in a dying industry and they were paying a guy $20m a year and losing $40m a year.  Late night is a lumbering dinosaur anyways waiting for a knockout punch and that's why CBS is canceling the Late Show altogether.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

If you want to know if you live in a free society, look no further than who isn’t allowed to criticize dear leader.

 

USA! USA! USA!

At least he gets to criticize dear leader on national tv for 9 more months until his contract runs out. Kind of a nice parting gift. 
 

Do you think he will be able to criticize dear leader when he sets up a podcast/streaming show? People are really wondering. 
 

 It’s all so chilling!

 

USA!

Posted
On 7/18/2025 at 1:19 PM, The Frankish Reich said:

I'm not much of a late night talk show guy, but my personal preferences are:

 

1. Kimmel. Trump calling him out actually sharpened his comedic edge. And I'm all about edgy.

 

[big gap]

 

2. Colbert. Mostly boring. Has always been. Annoying. Can't watch him. Not sad to see him go.

 

3. Fallon. No edge whatsoever. Bad wig in lame attempt to preserve "boyish charm."

 

All of them are a distant third - behind daylight in second - to the one and only Greg Gutfeld 😎

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

If you want to know if you live in a free society, look no further than who isn’t allowed to criticize dear leader.

 

USA! USA! USA!

Dude was losing $50 million a year, and had little hope of improving that number, but keep believing Trump is the reason. Truly TDS

Posted
On 7/18/2025 at 2:49 PM, JDHillFan said:

Almost certainly…

There is NO WAY it cost that much

Posted
10 minutes ago, TH3 said:

There is NO WAY it cost that much

It apparently has 200 employees just for that show, which seems like it about 150 too many. I am amazed that it takes that many people to set that up. 

Posted
3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

This is why.

 

 

 


Yeah, pretty much this. I don’t buy the conspiracy. Late-night TV is pretty much dead at this rate. 

Posted
18 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

If you want to know if you live in a free society, look no further than who isn’t allowed to criticize dear leader.

 

USA! USA! USA!

Huh? Are you living under a rock?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

Maybe not. Got data that says otherwise?

So you are taking some X posters word for it…because it fits your narrative?

Posted
40 minutes ago, TH3 said:

So you are taking some X posters word for it…because it fits your narrative?

No, dimwit. It’s been reported by Puck News. An organization rated as having a center-left bias:

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/puck-news-bias/

 

I’m not signing up for access but here’s the source. https://puck.news/was-colberts-cancellation-really-economic-for-cbs/

 

At the risk of triggering you, here’s the awful Fox News people sharing the news and rightfully giving credit to Puck News and the writer in their employ. 
 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/colberts-late-show-reportedly-losing-cbs-40m-year-critics-speculate-politics-drove-cancellation

 

Your post sucks. Educate yourself. At a minimum, show us where Puck is wrong. Should be easy enough. 
 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...