BillsFanNC Posted June 26 Posted June 26 I love how the left tries to always frame these instances as mistakes or errors. The King was fond of this tactic. Those were just mistakes the FBI made with the FISA court process and they've committed to making sure it doesn't happen ever again going forward. It was just a big mistake when THE ENTIRE LEGACY MEDIA and social media colluded to censor the true reporting of the Hunter Biden laptop by the NY Post. We were just fooled by the White House about Joe Biden's dementia. As a non useful idiot I might be inclined to buy into the mistake/error narrative if just once the erroneous reporting ended up helping the orange menace and/or hurting Democrats. 1
muppy Posted June 26 Posted June 26 (edited) 45 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: As a non useful idiot I might be inclined to buy into the mistake/error narrative if just once the erroneous reporting ended up helping the orange menace and/or hurting Democrats. that's fair I can understand you seeing it that way. but isn't the fact the erroneous reporting is now widely distributed as error makes HIM look better? certainly not worse. hurting democrats or hurting AMERICANS with misleading and false news. BOTH BAD hermano. Edited June 26 by muppy
Homelander Posted June 26 Posted June 26 This regime is deliberately lying, and no one on their team knows how to handle it - so they just keep shifting the goalposts.
Doc Posted June 26 Posted June 26 4 minutes ago, Homelander said: This regime is deliberately lying, and no one on their team knows how to handle it - so they just keep shifting the goalposts. What part was he lying about? There is no evidence that uranium was removed.
Homelander Posted June 26 Posted June 26 2 minutes ago, Doc said: What part was he lying about? There is no evidence that uranium was removed. Oh weird, I thought it was “COMPLETELY OBLITERATED!” What happened to all that chest-thumping confidence?
Big Blitz Posted June 26 Author Posted June 26 John Stewart ladies and gentlemen who goes by Homeloser here. It’s “gotcha” time to belittle a great American victory. 1
Big Blitz Posted June 26 Author Posted June 26 5 minutes ago, Homelander said: From this: To this: From this: To this:
stevestojan Posted June 27 Posted June 27 I don’t know how anyone can deny - now, a few days later with good/clearer intel - that: 1) This was a resoundingly successful mission based on its goal and the resulting outcome. 2) the “leak” was weak far left nonsensical reporting at best, criminal conduct at worst. 3) We can still disagree on whether the action and mission itself was still in the best interest of America. But, its seeming more and more to me (a far left whacko or a MAGA in disguise, depending on who you ask on this bored) that it was at least not as dangerous a move as I thought initially. So I’ll stand corrected there, for now, unless Iran does something insanely stupid. And I don’t think they want to be wiped off the face of the planet over “pride.” But again, what the ***** do I know? 4) Pete liquid lunch Hegseth still isn’t the best we could do for this very important government position, but at least this time, he seemed to do something right. That’s where I’m at right now. 3 3
CoudyBills Posted June 27 Posted June 27 2 hours ago, muppy said: that's fair I can understand you seeing it that way. but isn't the fact the erroneous reporting is now widely distributed as error makes HIM look better? certainly not worse. hurting democrats or hurting AMERICANS with misleading and false news. BOTH BAD hermano. The ends don't justify the means. You know that though. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted June 27 Posted June 27 1 hour ago, stevestojan said: I don’t know how anyone can deny - now, a few days later with good/clearer intel - that: 1) This was a resoundingly successful mission based on its goal and the resulting outcome. 2) the “leak” was weak far left nonsensical reporting at best, criminal conduct at worst. 3) We can still disagree on whether the action and mission itself was still in the best interest of America. But, its seeming more and more to me (a far left whacko or a MAGA in disguise, depending on who you ask on this bored) that it was at least not as dangerous a move as I thought initially. So I’ll stand corrected there, for now, unless Iran does something insanely stupid. And I don’t think they want to be wiped off the face of the planet over “pride.” But again, what the ***** do I know? 4) Pete liquid lunch Hegseth still isn’t the best we could do for this very important government position, but at least this time, he seemed to do something right. That’s where I’m at right now. I agree with almost all of this and give credit for being rationale and honest. 1
Doc Posted June 27 Posted June 27 1 hour ago, Homelander said: Oh weird, I thought it was “COMPLETELY OBLITERATED!” What happened to all that chest-thumping confidence? As far as anyone knows, it was.
dgrochester55 Posted June 27 Posted June 27 1 hour ago, stevestojan said: I don’t know how anyone can deny - now, a few days later with good/clearer intel - that: 1) This was a resoundingly successful mission based on its goal and the resulting outcome. 2) the “leak” was weak far left nonsensical reporting at best, criminal conduct at worst. 3) We can still disagree on whether the action and mission itself was still in the best interest of America. But, its seeming more and more to me (a far left whacko or a MAGA in disguise, depending on who you ask on this bored) that it was at least not as dangerous a move as I thought initially. So I’ll stand corrected there, for now, unless Iran does something insanely stupid. And I don’t think they want to be wiped off the face of the planet over “pride.” But again, what the ***** do I know? 4) Pete liquid lunch Hegseth still isn’t the best we could do for this very important government position, but at least this time, he seemed to do something right. That’s where I’m at right now. This is a very fair stance. As much as I despised Biden, I would have given him along with our military full credit if he had accomplished a successful mission like this. The safety of our country is a higher priority than anyone in office and if it turns out Iran was actually close to using a nuke on Israel (I understand that this is a big if), then this was a heroic effort and decision. 1 1
Homelander Posted June 27 Posted June 27 54 minutes ago, Doc said: As far as anyone knows, it was. Did you catch Trump’s reaction to Signalgate? Yeah, he barely blinked - yeah, not much. Now compare that to the full-blown meltdown they’re having over this. 😂
Big Blitz Posted June 27 Author Posted June 27 4 hours ago, Homelander said: Now compare that to the full-blown meltdown they’re having over this. 😂 Only one side has had a meltdown. The one who lost their underground nuclear reactor Obama paid for.
BillsFanNC Posted June 27 Posted June 27 11 hours ago, muppy said: that's fair I can understand you seeing it that way. but isn't the fact the erroneous reporting is now widely distributed as error makes HIM look better? certainly not worse. hurting democrats or hurting AMERICANS with misleading and false news. BOTH BAD hermano. No because the initial reporting is always by far the most important. Media will continue to spin any mea culpas at best or just plain ignore their own false reporting and leave it sitting out there uncorrected at worst. The reliable media full well knows the initial story is far more damaging and permanent than any later "correcting" will fix. A few examples: To this day you still have people who believe that Trump called neo Nazis and white nationalists very fine people when in reality he specifically condemned both groups. You even had Biden and Obama citing this long debunked lie during the 2024 campaign. Another example is the original made up story used to justify the censoring of the accurate Hunter laptop reporting in October 2020 is STILL up and uncorrected to this very day here: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276 The reporter that authored the above story? Natasha Bertrand. The author of the leaked intelligence reporting casting doubt on the success of operation midnight hammer? Natasha Bertrand. 1
4th&long Posted June 27 Posted June 27 (edited) CNN's Anderson Cooper smacks down Hegseth's claims with devastating supercut https://flip.it/71Bwk5 Cope harder Maga idiots. Edited June 27 by 4th&long
JDHillFan Posted June 27 Posted June 27 9 minutes ago, 4th&long said: CNN's Anderson Cooper smacks down Hegseth's claims with devastating supercut https://flip.it/71Bwk5 Cope and harder Maga idiots. Cope and harder Maga idiots… 😂🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻🤦🏻♀️ 1
Wacka Posted June 27 Posted June 27 12 hours ago, Homelander said: Oh weird, I thought it was “COMPLETELY OBLITERATED!” What happened to all that chest-thumping confidence? Hey idiot, the facility was completely obliterated and the uranium was spread all over the place. Do you think they were putting it on the front seat of their personal cars? If they have photos of the bombs hitting it, they had eyes on it all the time and would have bombed the s*** out of this convoys. How naive are you?
Recommended Posts