Wacka Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 12 hours ago, Homelander said: Oh weird, I thought it was “COMPLETELY OBLITERATED!” What happened to all that chest-thumping confidence? Hey idiot, the facility was completely obliterated and the uranium was spread all over the place. Do you think they were putting it on the front seat of their personal cars? If they have photos of the bombs hitting it, they had eyes on it all the time and would have bombed the s*** out of this convoys. How naive are you?
muppy Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: No because the initial reporting is always by far the most important. Media will continue to spin any mea culpas at best or just plain ignore their own false reporting and leave it sitting out there uncorrected at worst. Greetings. I needed to cut away all the links of support for your position. I am here to challenge your thinking just a wee bit. I don't think that the people outside of PPP chatrooms (most of the time that would be me) really care about laptops as compared to BOMBIMG OF IRAN come on now. You get stuck in the position of defending Everything and cannot accept that maybe Just MAYBE there are people who will scoff at CNN for screwing up this HUGELY IMPORTANT WORLD EVENT laptop? gimme a break Joe general American doesn't give many fuqs about a laptop aren't ALL politicians sleazy? YES a Bombing of Iran and they screw the pooch on the story? That's BAD for them trust me. laptop *raspberries* come on now u catch my drift. I think on this one you are wrong thats' what I think
BillsFanNC Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 5 minutes ago, muppy said: Greetings. I needed to cut away all the links of support for your position. I am here to challenge your thinking just a wee bit. I don't think that the people outside of PPP chatrooms (most of the time that would be me) really care about laptops as compared to BOMBIMG OF IRAN come on now. You get stuck in the position of defending Everything and cannot accept that maybe Just MAYBE there are people who will scoff at CNN for screwing up this HUGELY IMPORTANT WORLD EVENT laptop? gimme a break Joe general American doesn't give many fuqs about a laptop aren't ALL politicians sleazy? YES a Bombing of Iran and they screw the pooch on the story? That's BAD for them trust me. laptop *raspberries* come on now u catch my drift. I think on this one you are wrong thats' what I think Its not about the laptop. It's that the entire media censored the REPORTING about the laptop. Massive election interference. Twitter at the time suspended the account of the NY Post for reporting that was TRUE! Facebook halted it as well. In the USA one of the oldest newspapers in the nation has their reporting censored in the run up to the election? It's a massive story and the "error" there dwarfs the impact of the "error" with the Iran bombing. I don't care what the story is, censorship is bad, right? In some instances they went beyond just not covering it and instead told you that any reporting you might come across is a waste of time. To boil it all down if the NYT had credible reporting of a Don Jr. laptop with authenticated emails detailing foreign pay for play schemes you'd want to be able to hear about it, right?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: No because the initial reporting is always by far the most important. Media will continue to spin any mea culpas at best or just plain ignore their own false reporting and leave it sitting out there uncorrected at worst. The reliable media full well knows the initial story is far more damaging and permanent than any later "correcting" will fix. A few examples: To this day you still have people who believe that Trump called neo Nazis and white nationalists very fine people when in reality he specifically condemned both groups. You even had Biden and Obama citing this long debunked lie during the 2024 campaign. Another example is the original made up story used to justify the censoring of the accurate Hunter laptop reporting in October 2020 is STILL up and uncorrected to this very day here: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276 The reporter that authored the above story? Natasha Bertrand. The author of the leaked intelligence reporting casting doubt on the success of operation midnight hammer? Natasha Bertrand. Neo nazis and white nationalists are almost universally maga's. Remember the trump flags along with the Auschwitz T shirt on Jan 6. Or "stand down and stand ready" or whatever the orange gasbag (as you called him) dog whistled to the proud boys? CNN reported a leaked document later confirmed to have been written by military intelligence. That's their job. It's news. And the document is real. Edited 4 hours ago by Joe Ferguson forever
JDHillFan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 27 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Neo nazis and white nationalists are almost universally maga's. Remember the trump flags along with the Auschwitz T shirt on Jan 6. Or "stand down and stand ready" or whatever the orange gasbag (as you called him) dog whistled to the proud boys? CNN reported a leaked document later confirmed to have been written by military intelligence. That's their job. It's news. And the document is real. Why do you think the initial CNN reporting didn’t mention the “low confidence” part? Surely they had a reason.
muppy Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 34 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Its not about the laptop. It's that the entire media censored the REPORTING about the laptop. Massive election interference. Twitter at the time suspended the account of the NY Post for reporting that was TRUE! Facebook halted it as well. In the USA one of the oldest newspapers in the nation has their reporting censored in the run up to the election? It's a massive story and the "error" there dwarfs the impact of the "error" with the Iran bombing. I don't care what the story is, censorship is bad, right? In some instances they went beyond just not covering it and instead told you that any reporting you might come across is a waste of time. To boil it all down if the NYT had credible reporting of a Don Jr. laptop with authenticated emails detailing foreign pay for play schemes you'd want to be able to hear about it, right? you are not getting my point at all whatsoever. Can we please focus on what is happening NOW not then please. it is the SCOPE MAGNITUDE of Importance a Bomb vs a laptop? Im saying PPP types care about laptops and will hang on to that to the exclusion of much ANYTHING that isn't HARD CORE RIGHT WING HANDBOOK Rhetoric. It is so TRIBAL! SMH Please lets just call deuces you aren't listening to any reason or iogic right now. Basically you are not listening to ME DEUCES
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago https://www.newyorker.com/cartoons/daily-cartoon/monday-june-23rd-spectacular-success
Recommended Posts