BillsFanNC Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago I love how the left tries to always frame these instances as mistakes or errors. The King was fond of this tactic. Those were just mistakes the FBI made with the FISA court process and they've committed to making sure it doesn't happen ever again going forward. It was just a big mistake when THE ENTIRE LEGACY MEDIA and social media colluded to censor the true reporting of the Hunter Biden laptop by the NY Post. We were just fooled by the White House about Joe Biden's dementia. As a non useful idiot I might be inclined to buy into the mistake/error narrative if just once the erroneous reporting ended up helping the orange menace and/or hurting Democrats. 1
muppy Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago (edited) 45 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: As a non useful idiot I might be inclined to buy into the mistake/error narrative if just once the erroneous reporting ended up helping the orange menace and/or hurting Democrats. that's fair I can understand you seeing it that way. but isn't the fact the erroneous reporting is now widely distributed as error makes HIM look better? certainly not worse. hurting democrats or hurting AMERICANS with misleading and false news. BOTH BAD hermano. Edited 10 hours ago by muppy
Homelander Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago This regime is deliberately lying, and no one on their team knows how to handle it - so they just keep shifting the goalposts.
Doc Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Homelander said: This regime is deliberately lying, and no one on their team knows how to handle it - so they just keep shifting the goalposts. What part was he lying about? There is no evidence that uranium was removed.
Homelander Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Doc said: What part was he lying about? There is no evidence that uranium was removed. Oh weird, I thought it was “COMPLETELY OBLITERATED!” What happened to all that chest-thumping confidence?
Big Blitz Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago John Stewart ladies and gentlemen who goes by Homeloser here. It’s “gotcha” time to belittle a great American victory. 1
Big Blitz Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Homelander said: From this: To this: From this: To this:
stevestojan Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago I don’t know how anyone can deny - now, a few days later with good/clearer intel - that: 1) This was a resoundingly successful mission based on its goal and the resulting outcome. 2) the “leak” was weak far left nonsensical reporting at best, criminal conduct at worst. 3) We can still disagree on whether the action and mission itself was still in the best interest of America. But, its seeming more and more to me (a far left whacko or a MAGA in disguise, depending on who you ask on this bored) that it was at least not as dangerous a move as I thought initially. So I’ll stand corrected there, for now, unless Iran does something insanely stupid. And I don’t think they want to be wiped off the face of the planet over “pride.” But again, what the ***** do I know? 4) Pete liquid lunch Hegseth still isn’t the best we could do for this very important government position, but at least this time, he seemed to do something right. That’s where I’m at right now. 3 2
CoudyBills Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, muppy said: that's fair I can understand you seeing it that way. but isn't the fact the erroneous reporting is now widely distributed as error makes HIM look better? certainly not worse. hurting democrats or hurting AMERICANS with misleading and false news. BOTH BAD hermano. The ends don't justify the means. You know that though. 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, stevestojan said: I don’t know how anyone can deny - now, a few days later with good/clearer intel - that: 1) This was a resoundingly successful mission based on its goal and the resulting outcome. 2) the “leak” was weak far left nonsensical reporting at best, criminal conduct at worst. 3) We can still disagree on whether the action and mission itself was still in the best interest of America. But, its seeming more and more to me (a far left whacko or a MAGA in disguise, depending on who you ask on this bored) that it was at least not as dangerous a move as I thought initially. So I’ll stand corrected there, for now, unless Iran does something insanely stupid. And I don’t think they want to be wiped off the face of the planet over “pride.” But again, what the ***** do I know? 4) Pete liquid lunch Hegseth still isn’t the best we could do for this very important government position, but at least this time, he seemed to do something right. That’s where I’m at right now. I agree with almost all of this and give credit for being rationale and honest. 1
Doc Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, Homelander said: Oh weird, I thought it was “COMPLETELY OBLITERATED!” What happened to all that chest-thumping confidence? As far as anyone knows, it was.
dgrochester55 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, stevestojan said: I don’t know how anyone can deny - now, a few days later with good/clearer intel - that: 1) This was a resoundingly successful mission based on its goal and the resulting outcome. 2) the “leak” was weak far left nonsensical reporting at best, criminal conduct at worst. 3) We can still disagree on whether the action and mission itself was still in the best interest of America. But, its seeming more and more to me (a far left whacko or a MAGA in disguise, depending on who you ask on this bored) that it was at least not as dangerous a move as I thought initially. So I’ll stand corrected there, for now, unless Iran does something insanely stupid. And I don’t think they want to be wiped off the face of the planet over “pride.” But again, what the ***** do I know? 4) Pete liquid lunch Hegseth still isn’t the best we could do for this very important government position, but at least this time, he seemed to do something right. That’s where I’m at right now. This is a very fair stance. As much as I despised Biden, I would have given him along with our military full credit if he had accomplished a successful mission like this. The safety of our country is a higher priority than anyone in office and if it turns out Iran was actually close to using a nuke on Israel (I understand that this is a big if), then this was a heroic effort and decision. 1 1
Homelander Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 54 minutes ago, Doc said: As far as anyone knows, it was. Did you catch Trump’s reaction to Signalgate? Yeah, he barely blinked - yeah, not much. Now compare that to the full-blown meltdown they’re having over this. 😂
Big Blitz Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, Homelander said: Now compare that to the full-blown meltdown they’re having over this. 😂 Only one side has had a meltdown. The one who lost their underground nuclear reactor Obama paid for.
Recommended Posts