Joe Ferguson forever Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 (edited) 20 minutes ago, BillStime said: Sounds like a confession, Conald because just about everyone has a lawyer and accountant misrepresent a porn star payoff as a legal expense. Has anybody mentioned "Sleepy Don" in court. You can't make this stuff up; https://www.mediaite.com/politics/trump-glared-at-maggie-haberman-for-several-seconds-after-she-reported-he-fell-asleep-in-court/ Edited April 16 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Looks like Trump was having trouble understanding the judge's actual instructions. But I suppose we cannot let the facts stand in the way of some good rage baiting. Trump is seething about missing Barron’s graduation. Here’s what the judge actually said "Before jury selection commenced, Mr Trump’s lawyer, Todd Blanche, asked Judge Juan Merchan if the court could adjourn on 17 May so Mr Trump could attend Barron’s graduation. In New York, criminal defendants must attend trial unless they apply for a waiver, which Mr Trump has not done. Judge Merchan said he could not rule “at this time” but noted that if the trial was “running behind schedule” they would not be able to accommodate. Despite no firm ruling on the matter, Mr Trump still purported that the judge made an unfair ruling preventing him from attending his son’s graduation." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 15 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Fundamentalists all over America are ignoring the immoral scumbags actions just like you. The marriage is transactional? How Christian… Now do Slick Willy. And Hilly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 (edited) 2 hours ago, Doc said: Now do Slick Willy. And Hilly. Fundamentalists don't support those 2. And they don't acquiesce to being called "god"... Edited April 16 by Joe Ferguson forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 (edited) If this man could ever stay on point, he has some absolute banger political instincts. Stuck in Manhattan being politically prosecuted.. No bother.. Campaigns outside the bodega were Jose Alba defended himself from a robbery. Edited April 16 by SCBills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted April 17 Author Share Posted April 17 Election interference - right @BillsFanNC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 Our Justice System is going to be irreparably harmed this summer. Its always had issues, but the facade of being given a fair shake by a “jury of your peers” is about to be fired into the sun. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 23 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Fundamentalists don't support those 2. And they don't acquiesce to being called "god"... Not everyone likes everything each candidate supports. You pick and choose what you're willing to ignore if the rest is what's more important. I think that abortion is more of a big deal to fundamentalists than cheating on your wife. And wait, didn't you say you cheated on your wife? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 1 hour ago, Doc said: Not everyone likes everything each candidate supports. You pick and choose what you're willing to ignore if the rest is what's more important. I think that abortion is more of a big deal to fundamentalists than cheating on your wife. And wait, didn't you say you cheated on your wife? nope, never did...and I'm not running for prez as the religious choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted April 18 Author Share Posted April 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 On 4/17/2024 at 9:50 AM, SCBills said: Our Justice System is going to be irreparably harmed this summer. Its always had issues, but the facade of being given a fair shake by a “jury of your peers” is about to be fired into the sun. Sounds like you'd hate to have her on a jury for if he should be President.....does not mean she can't be unbiased for a criminal trial, not supporting a politician does not translate to just assuming they're committing crimes. On 4/16/2024 at 9:59 AM, ChiGoose said: Looks like Trump was having trouble understanding the judge's actual instructions. But I suppose we cannot let the facts stand in the way of some good rage baiting. Trump is seething about missing Barron’s graduation. Here’s what the judge actually said "Before jury selection commenced, Mr Trump’s lawyer, Todd Blanche, asked Judge Juan Merchan if the court could adjourn on 17 May so Mr Trump could attend Barron’s graduation. In New York, criminal defendants must attend trial unless they apply for a waiver, which Mr Trump has not done. Judge Merchan said he could not rule “at this time” but noted that if the trial was “running behind schedule” they would not be able to accommodate. Despite no firm ruling on the matter, Mr Trump still purported that the judge made an unfair ruling preventing him from attending his son’s graduation." He's just upset that if the schedule actually does work out he'll lose out on a great excuse and maybe have to attend one of his kid's graduation for the first time ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 1 hour ago, Warcodered said: He's just upset that if the schedule actually does work out he'll lose out on a great excuse and maybe have to attend one of his kid's graduation for the first time ever. Maybe. I just think he doesn’t care about facts and knows that his supporters will believe absolutely anything he says without question. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 10 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Wouldn't this be an example of "not rigging" the trial? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warcodered Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 (edited) 13 minutes ago, TH3 said: Wouldn't this be an example of "not rigging" the trial? "You see the system is rigged"-points to example of system safeguards doing their job. Also the 90s, so like around 3 decades ago? I mean you can't lie about that but I'm not sure how disqualifying that would have even turned out being, though a lawyer could most likely get rid of them. Edited April 18 by Warcodered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TH3 Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Warcodered said: You see the system is rigged points to example of system safeguards doing their job. Also the 90s, so like around 3 decades ago? I mean you can't lie about that but I'm not sure how disqualifying that would have even turned out being, though a lawyer could most likely get rid of them. Not sure you got what I meant - Our usual resident low IQ poster links an equally brainwashed twitter proclaiming the trial is rigged - as an example of this riggededness - shows news link that obviously bias juror tossed. This is an example of the system working and not being rigged. I wonder if our Irish fellow and the twitter poster he linked understand the total SELF OWN they just put on. Edited April 18 by TH3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 13 minutes ago, TH3 said: Wouldn't this be an example of "not rigging" the trial? One would think so. If one were a thinking person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 35 minutes ago, TH3 said: Wouldn't this be an example of "not rigging" the trial? It's an example of a lefty lying to get on the jury. Comprehension is key Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiGoose Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Judge Merchant seems to think they’ll still be able to do opening statements first thing Monday. Depends on if they can seat the rest of the alternates tomorrow. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts