Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 7/19/2023 at 1:44 PM, ChiGoose said:


1. The documents case is actually the opposite of DOA. Any rational defendant would have already settled because there’s very little chance of acquittal.

 

2. Linear time is really triggering to you, huh?

Expand  

LMAO. you got the MSM line down pat.

 

They would love a guilty plea as the left kind of has a record of these witch hunts being huge let downs.

 

just like the document case. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
  On 7/19/2023 at 1:47 PM, Chris farley said:

LMAO. you got the MSM line down pat.

 

They would love a guilty plea as the left kind of has a record of these witch hunts being huge let downs.

 

just like the document case. 

 

 

 

 

Expand  

Buddy, you clearly have no clue what you’re talking about. I hope you’re not listening to that Julie Kelly moron. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 7/19/2023 at 1:49 PM, ChiGoose said:

Buddy, you clearly have no clue what you’re talking about. I hope you’re not listening to that Julie Kelly moron. 

Expand  

True. Nothing.

 

there is no truth to the opinion the DEMS have tried many times to charge or take him out, only to have it be theatre and huge duds.

 

im not listening to talking heads or NYT and parroting it as my own.

 

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 7/19/2023 at 1:58 PM, Chris farley said:

True. Nothing.

 

there is no truth to the opinion the DEMS have tried many times to charge or take him out, only to have it be theatre and huge duds.

 

im not listening to talking heads or NYT and parroting it as my own.

 

 

 

 

Expand  


You could try reading the case documents or expert analysis (from people with actual relevant experience) but that might be a bit hard for you. If so, I guess you can just keep railing against the passage of time. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted

So Trump should've listened to his counsel and made sure that any and all criminal activity he engaged in occurred only in Palm Beach, where he apparently owns the judge, and not in DC, where Joe Biden and the Democrats apparently own the judges?

Not a particularly persuasive line of argument ....

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
  On 7/19/2023 at 2:33 PM, The Frankish Reich said:

So Trump should've listened to his counsel and made sure that any and all criminal activity he engaged in occurred only in Palm Beach, where he apparently owns the judge, and not in DC, where Joe Biden and the Democrats apparently own the judges?

Not a particularly persuasive line of argument ....

Expand  

 

If he didn't want to get tried in DC, he shouldn't have committed crimes in DC. But his supporters are big mad that he's being held accountable for his actions.

 

Also, if he had listened to his attorney in Florida instead of lying to him and causing him to lie to the government, he wouldn't even be facing charged in Florida.

 

Nobody but himself to blame.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
  On 5/6/2023 at 10:43 AM, BillsFanNC said:

Amendment VI

 

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury..

 

Batting .000 and pissing on the Constitution in DC and other commie jurisdictions.

 

:lol:

 

 

Expand  

Breaking news.  Juries are dumb.  Just like MAGA.  Actually, MAGA's probably dumber given that everybody avoids the redneck MAGA dregs in jury pools because they're so stupid and unpredictable.  So the idea that you'd get a brighter jury in MAGA country is just wrong. 

  On 7/19/2023 at 3:01 PM, ChiGoose said:

 

If he didn't want to get tried in DC, he shouldn't have committed crimes in DC. But his supporters are big mad that he's being held accountable for his actions.

 

Also, if he had listened to his attorney in Florida instead of lying to him and causing him to lie to the government, he wouldn't even be facing charged in Florida.

 

Nobody but himself to blame.

Expand  

Agreed.  Self-inflicted wounds.  Have fun sweating it out at trial(s). 

  On 7/19/2023 at 2:25 PM, BillsFanNC said:

 

Expand  

Why not ask this guy about quantum physics.  He has just as much experience there as he does in a courtroom.  And, instead of blaming a likely result on a jury that hasn't been picked, perhaps he may wish to consider evaluating the facts known now and the facts that eventually are adduced at trial.  Relying on this guy to give an opinion on a legal matter is like asking @Docabout an effective treatment for COVID.  It's the height of foolishness. 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...