Jump to content

Are Republicans pro-terror?


Recommended Posts

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/405877-maxine-waters-i-threaten-trump-supporters-all-the-time

 

“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up,” Waters told a crowd in California over the weekend. “If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”

 

This is different. Obviously. 

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

100% pro terror

 

 

 

100% pro-terror. But this is different. Obviously. 
 

idiot

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

17 hours ago, JDHillFan said:

Celebrating violence. On brand for the party of peace, love and science. 

idiots/freaks

Randy Paul lost a fist fight, got beat up mano-on-mano, no one attacked him with a weapon. It was a gardening dispute, not political violence 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

Randy Paul lost a fist fight, got beat up mano-on-mano, no one attacked him with a weapon. It was a gardening dispute, not political violence 

You are excusing violence against someone you disagree with.
 

Very Putin-y. You should move to Russia. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

 

Randy Paul lost a fist fight, got beat up mano-on-mano, no one attacked him with a weapon. It was a gardening dispute, not political violence 

 

"Attempted assassination of Nan."  LOL!  Nan would had the good sense to stay in the bathroom...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Fake news, right? 

 

And you complain about being called a Cult

 

First of all, if Nan had been home, she'd have had security and this never would have happened.  But don't let that spoil the narrative.  Not that they shouldn't have 24/7 security for him with all the money they have and the target he is.  But I don't believe for one second that DePape was calling for Nan based merely on what Paul Pelosi claimed and will need actual proof.  As for the bathroom thing, that's what POLITICO reported.  If Paul came out of it, he's an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

yes they are 

Yup.  Not one word about what could be an attempt to assassinate the Speaker of the House.  

On 10/30/2022 at 10:40 PM, Doc said:

 

First of all, if Nan had been home, she'd have had security and this never would have happened.  But don't let that spoil the narrative.  Not that they shouldn't have 24/7 security for him with all the money they have and the target he is.  But I don't believe for one second that DePape was calling for Nan based merely on what Paul Pelosi claimed and will need actual proof.  As for the bathroom thing, that's what POLITICO reported.  If Paul came out of it, he's an idiot.

 

Victim blaming.  And Paul Pelosi’s statement constitutes “actual proof.”  It’s up to the fact finder whether to believe it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Yup.  Not one word about what could be an attempt to assassinate the Speaker of the House.  

 

Victim blaming.  And Paul Pelosi’s statement constitutes “actual proof.”  It’s up to the fact finder whether to believe it. 

 

Funny, you libs had no problem blaming people who didn't get the Wuhan vaccine if they got sick or died.  So that dog don't hunt no mo.

 

And it's not proof, actual or otherwise.  It's a statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Funny, you libs had no problem blaming people who didn't get the Wuhan vaccine if they got sick or died.  So that dog don't hunt no mo.

 

And it's not proof, actual or otherwise.  It's a statement.


Hoax. 

 

They had a choice whether to get the vaccine.  Give me liberty or death, they said.  Some got liberty, others got death.  That was their choice.  
 

Paul Pelosi didn’t have a choice when a criminal burglarized his home and hit him with a hammer.  
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Hoax. 

 

They had a choice whether to get the vaccine.  Give me liberty or death, they said.  Some got liberty, others got death.  That was their choice.  
 

Paul Pelosi didn’t have a choice when a criminal burglarized his home and hit him with a hammer.  

 

He had the choice to do the smart thing and lock himself in his bathroom.  He chose poorly.  Same exact thing.

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:


Hoax. 

 

They had a choice whether to get the vaccine.  Give me liberty or death, they said.  Some got liberty, others got death.  That was their choice.  
 

Paul Pelosi didn’t have a choice when a criminal burglarized his home and hit him with a hammer.  
 

 

He had choice to  pull out a gun and blow the gut away.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Wacka said:

He had choice to  pull out a gun and blow the gut away.

Ridiculous.  But let’s play a stupid game.  Say Paul had a gun and wants to use it, but gets the shakes and misses, and then the assailant puts the hammer through Paul’s skull and kills him.  At that point, is it Paul’s fault for being a lousy shot?  

Just now, SectionC3 said:

Ridiculous.  But let’s play a stupid game.  Say Paul had a gun and wants to use it, but gets the shakes and misses, and then the assailant puts the hammer through Paul’s skull and kills him.  At that point, is it Paul’s fault for being a lousy shot?  

Or, what is the assailant was shot, but the bullet stopped by a vest? It’s then Paul’s fault for not having a high caliber rifle? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Ridiculous.  But let’s play a stupid game.  Say Paul had a gun and wants to use it, but gets the shakes and misses, and then the assailant puts the hammer through Paul’s skull and kills him.  At that point, is it Paul’s fault for being a lousy shot?  

Or, what is the assailant was shot, but the bullet stopped by a vest? It’s then Paul’s fault for not having a high caliber rifle? 


1.) Do you actually think someone with a vest is going to continue on after getting shot? Do you know what happens when you get shot with a bullet proof vest? 
 

2.) Shotgun, wide spread, you ain’t missing anything close range with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...