Jump to content

Random Political Thoughts Inc.


T&C

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

How weird you think objecting to him giving national security information to a Chinese spy is simply "theater". Seriously don't change  you are easy to categorize and predict. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

How weird you think objecting to him giving national security information to a Chinese spy is simply "theater". Seriously don't change  you are easy to categorize and predict. 

you're confusing him with Salwell, who was not censured as far as I know.

As my link noted, this could help Schiff win a senate seat.

 

He's extremely intelligent:

"No matter how many false justifications or slanders you level against me, you but indict yourselves," Schiff said. "As Liz Cheney said, 'there will come a day when Donald Trump is gone, but your dishonor will remain.'"

"This resolution attacks me for initiating an investigation into Trump campaign solicitation and acceptance of Russian help in the 2016 election even though the investigation was first led not by me, but by a Republican chairman," Schiff said in his remarks, later adding: "In short, it would accuse me of omnipotence, the leader of some vast Deep State conspiracy, and of course, it is nonsense."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, this will help pencil neck liar get a senate seat.

 

Boy I miss the days the party loyalist actually held the party to standards.

 

vs just cheerleading lies and corruption cause "My team"

 

or is that like the argument that the DEMS using the DOJ to go after trump has helped trumps polling?

 

Schiff has more support outside his state, than in.  

 

 

 

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

LOL, this will help pencil neck liar get a senate seat.

 

Boy I miss the days the party loyalist actually held the party to standards.

 

vs just cheerleading lies and corruption cause "My team"

 

or is that like the argument that the DEMS using the DOJ to go after trump has helped trumps polling?

 

Schiff has more support outside his state, than in.  

 

 

 

 

he did nothing wrong.  There is plenty of evidence in the Mueller report that the Russians aided trump's campaign and election.  Why do yo think they wanted trump to win?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/paul-manafort-russia-polling-data-b2140727.html

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

he did nothing wrong.  There is plenty of evidence in the Mueller report that the Russians aided trump's campaign and election.  Why do yo think they wanted trump to win?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/paul-manafort-russia-polling-data-b2140727.html

Give it up Hawk. 2016 called and they want their failed Hilary campaign back. She lost because in the end Trump out worked her. Huge self inflicted error on her part. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Give it up Hawk. 2016 called and they want their failed Hilary campaign back. She lost because in the end Trump out worked her. Huge self inflicted error on her part. 

the two facts are not mutually exclusive.  Hillary f'ed up (by saying out loud what many actually agree with) and Russia helped trump win...

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, redtail hawk said:

the two facts are not mutually exclusive.  Hillary f'ed up (by saying out loud what many actually agree with) and Russia helped trump win...

Nice excuse there Hawk. Russia had zero impact on the election. There’s not a person alive who didn’t already have an opinion of BOTH Trump and Clinton. Not one! 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Nice excuse there Hawk. Russia had zero impact on the election. There’s not a person alive who didn’t already have an opinion of BOTH Trump and Clinton. Not one! 

sure, the Russians throw away assets and intelligence officers for no good reason (excepting Ukraine, of course).  why do u think they wanted trump to win?  Are you Russian, comrade?

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

sure, the Russians throw away assets and intelligence officers for no good reason (excepting Ukraine, of course).  why do u think they wanted trump to win?

they probably didn't want Hillary as she is a raging war hawk, like her idol Kissinger. 

 

but that at no time means they actually helped him win.

 

or got him the 75 million votes he got in 2020

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chris farley said:

they probably didn't want Hillary as she is a raging war hawk, like her idol Kissinger. 

 

but that at no time means they actually helped him win.

 

or got him the 75 million votes he got in 2020

 

 

 

 

you all sure selectively read the Mueller report.  Did you miss the part on Russian interference in the election.  Kind of like ignoring the part of the bible where it says "Love your neighbors as yourself" and "turn the other cheek"...

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Kind of like ignoring the part of the bible where it says "Love your neighbors as yourself" and "turn the other cheek"...

98% of your posts include negative comments towards those that don’t march to your drum. What are you trying to accomplish by posting this? 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

98% of your posts include negative comments towards those that don’t march to your drum. What are you trying to accomplish by posting this? 

tough love...

ready to help...and I'm not claiming to be "Christian Nationalist", a literal interpreter of the bible or perfect.

but you are correct.  Mixing topics here is counterproductive.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

98% of your posts include negative comments towards those that don’t march to your drum. What are you trying to accomplish by posting this? 

 

 

 

Romans 16:17-20 

I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them. For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naive.

 

 

Isaiah 5:20 

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

 

 

.

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

sure, the Russians throw away assets and intelligence officers for no good reason (excepting Ukraine, of course).  why do u think they wanted trump to win?  Are you Russian, comrade?

 

49 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

you all sure selectively read the Mueller report.  Did you miss the part on Russian interference in the election.  Kind of like ignoring the part of the bible where it says "Love your neighbors as yourself" and "turn the other cheek"...

 

Russia's been trying to interfere in US elections for decades.  Obama even knew about it and did nothing.  Why?  Because he knew it wouldn't affect the outcome.  And it didn't.  But it sure tore the country apart, which for them was worth the $1M+ they spent.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Romans 16:17-20 

I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them. For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naive.

 

 

Isaiah 5:20 

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

 

 

.

cool...I can do this all day

https://sojo.net/22-bible-verses-welcoming-immigrants

 

btw, do you really find my posts to be smooth talk and flattery?  Sure hope you don't think I'm flattering you...

1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

 

Russia's been trying to interfere in US elections for decades.  Obama even knew about it and did nothing.  Why?  Because he knew it wouldn't affect the outcome.  And it didn't.  But it sure tore the country apart, which for them was worth the $1M+ they spent.

we are not talking about Obama but about trump...so you admit that the Russians interfered to help trump.  Cool, so the investigation was justified.  I don't want them interfering.  Do you, comrade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, redtail hawk said:

cool...I can do this all day

https://sojo.net/22-bible-verses-welcoming-immigrants

 

btw, do you really find my posts to be smooth talk and flattery?  Sure hope you don't think I'm flattering you...

you're a football fan?  imagine if they moved the goal post like you're doing.  

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, redtail hawk said:

you're confusing him with Salwell, who was not censured as far as I know.

As my link noted, this could help Schiff win a senate seat.

 

He's extremely intelligent:

"No matter how many false justifications or slanders you level against me, you but indict yourselves," Schiff said. "As Liz Cheney said, 'there will come a day when Donald Trump is gone, but your dishonor will remain.'"

"This resolution attacks me for initiating an investigation into Trump campaign solicitation and acceptance of Russian help in the 2016 election even though the investigation was first led not by me, but by a Republican chairman," Schiff said in his remarks, later adding: "In short, it would accuse me of omnipotence, the leader of some vast Deep State conspiracy, and of course, it is nonsense."

He’s anything but intelligent. He’s a lying scumbag.

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...