Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Chef Jim said:

 

He's not POTUS because he lost the election.  Lawyers don't decide that the electorate does.  In my mind he lost fair and square.  The fact you have no clue that I felt that way just shows how big a fool you are.  You just assume ***** don't you.  Like the fact you assume I have some special safe place. 

 

Lawyers, Guns and Money.  Relax Billy Boy.  You got your boy in the WH.  You can put the Trump derangement away.  :rolleyes:

 

I suggest you step away from the computer and get some air Billy Boy.  

 

BTW show us where Trump is a fraud.  We'll wait.  


But you alluded he had the lawyers money and guns… Like that was supposed to mean something. What happened?What success did that bring him? And the guns??? Wtf is wrong with you? You really do think you’re a tough guy w your gun/glock talk. lmao… 

 

And prove to you that Trump is a fraud? Are you an idiot? Look at his whole life of conning people, contractors and the government. He freakn conned you Karen.
 

I suggest YOU step away from the computer and get some air.

 

You prove daily what a joke you are.

 

Carry on princess… and go back to your safe place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:


But you alluded he had the lawyers money and guns… Like that was supposed to mean something. What happened?What success did that bring him? And the guns??? Wtf is wrong with you? You really do think you’re a tough guy w your gun/glock talk. lmao… 

 

And prove to you that Trump is a fraud? Are you an idiot? Look at his whole life of conning people, contractors and the government. He freakn conned you Karen.
 

I suggest YOU step away from the computer and get some air.

 

You prove daily what a joke you are.

 

Carry on princess… and go back to your safe place. 


Ha!  You’re telling me to step away when you freak out I sarcastically allude to the lyrics of a song. 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Nancy Pelosi’s January 6th Select Committee Hoax.

 

To pretend otherwise to admit to glaring innumeracy. Or to partisanship so blind you refuse to see the truth. Or perhaps just to such a normalcy bias you’re still trying to sing yourself to sleep.  I have bad news. It’s not safe to sleep. 

 

https://spectator.org/nancy-pelosis-january-6th-special-committee-hoax/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

For those on PPP , who are not frothing at the mouth at virtually nothing.

 

Here are the big revelations so far: 

 

1. People knew that the widely televised event was happening, even those at the White House.

 

2. People told Trump that rioting is bad and he should condemn it.

 

(We knew both of these things on January 6, 2020.)

 

 

 

I guess when you get nothing for 10 months, you can make yourself believe that this latest drip is a tidal wave.

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

For those on PPP , who are not frothing at the mouth at virtually nothing.

 

Here are the big revelations so far: 

 

1. People knew that the widely televised event was happening, even those at the White House.

 

2. People told Trump that rioting is bad and he should condemn it.

 

(We knew both of these things on January 6, 2020.)

 

 

 

I guess when you get nothing for 10 months, you can make yourself believe that this latest drip is a tidal wave.

 

 


Yeah, and I guess that the riots of 2020 that costs billions of dollars and many lives don’t mean shyt.

 

But hey, let’s continue to spit fire about an “insurrection” , which no weapons were found and where law enforcement basically let the nutjobs into the building.

 

Gimmie a fvckin break.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, njbuff said:


Yeah, and I guess that the riots of 2020 that costs billions of dollars and many lives don’t mean shyt.

 

But hey, let’s continue to spit fire about an “insurrection” , which no weapons were found and where law enforcement basically let the nutjobs into the building.

 

Gimmie a fvckin break.

CNN reported at the time it was a mostly peaceful insurrection.  But the lack of fires and weapons made them suspicious of the event.  At that point they realized it wasn't an Antifa or BLM protest by rather a pro-Trump event which resulted in an immediate change of narrative along with their marketing department developing the catch-phrase "the biggest threat to democracy since the Civil War".  A line often repeated by many since. 

 

Now the most recent news flash about the committee's latest discovery.  People talk to each other!  A stunning smoking gun revelation after 10 months of investigation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

CNN reported at the time it was a mostly peaceful insurrection.  But the lack of fires and weapons made them suspicious of the event.  At that point they realized it wasn't an Antifa or BLM protest by rather a pro-Trump event which resulted in an immediate change of narrative along with their marketing department developing the catch-phrase "the biggest threat to democracy since the Civil War".  A line often repeated by many since. 

 

Now the most recent news flash about the committee's latest discovery.  People talk to each other!  A stunning smoking gun revelation after 10 months of investigation. 


Utter morons.

 

If they wanna imprison Meadows, Trump Jr. etc for their texts………..

 

they had better imprison people like Lisa Page, Peter (whatever the fvck his last name is), so on and so forth for their texts.

 

The Demonrats are the KINGS of hypocrisy.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, njbuff said:


Utter morons.

 

If they wanna imprison Meadows, Trump Jr. etc for their texts………..

 

they had better imprison people like Lisa Page, Peter (whatever the fvck his last name is), so on and so forth for their texts.

 

The Demonrats are the KINGS of hypocrisy.

 

Though it's difficult to take seriously someone who says "Demonrats"

 

The committee wants to ask Meadows about his texts, just as Peter and Lisa were questioned about theirs, except Meadows is ignoring a subpoena, hence contempt charges.

 

Equate them all you want but your analogy doesn't quite cut it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...