Jump to content

Trump’s Post Presidency—What Will He Do?


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, B-Man said:

Trump's coming arrest next week will only spur the 70 million voters that supported him to do so again.

 

Considering Biden got 81,000,000 votes in 2020 - and would no doubt get more in 2024 as young people continue to vote and your voters die off - good luck with these "threats"

 

lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Reminder - this BS has already been litigated ...

 

 

The end result ...

 

FridU-6XoAA_vku?format=jpg&name=small

 

 

 

.

You realize this is completely divorced from the case against trump?

6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Reminiscent of you whining about Taibbi without being able to point to a single piece of his reporting that was false.
 

That’s different though. Right?

Either your reading comprehension is subpar or your memory is.  I cited a story with multiple points of evidence.  @BillStime posted a clip of his testimony where his ethics were proven to be weak

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

i think it's pointless to engage...read the article.  and tell me what you find false.

You expect me to pay to read something from a group who has been proven to be liars? But you are right it is pointless, you made an accusation without evidence and then stated I had to prove a negative. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

You realize this is completely divorced from the case against trump?

Either your reading comprehension is subpar or your memory is.  I cited a story with multiple points of evidence.  @BillStime posted a clip of his testimony where his ethics were proven to be weak

What evidence did you provide? Why be so secretive. All I’ve seen from you is declaring the guy to be Kari Lake/maga. You would be better off just saying you don’t know the first thing about his reporting. Let’s discuss where his reporting has been false. Educate me. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

What evidence did you provide? Why be so secretive. All I’ve seen from you is declaring the guy to be Kari Lake/maga. You would be better off just saying you don’t know the first thing about his reporting. Let’s discuss where his reporting has been false. Educate me. 

https://news.yahoo.com/matt-taibbi-smirks-house-committee-000115911.html

read it and weep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Read it and weep? That article is your “evidence” that Taibbi’s reporting is false? Good god man. That article is nothing but a transcript of the hearing where bloviating politicians cut off “the witness” every time he speaks. Your blinders probably prevent you from noticing that every politician does the same regardless of party, and it’s pathetic. 
 

You have been told that Taibbi is bad and you are running with it. All despite not being able to highlight a single falsehood in his reporting. Someone your age should make more effort to think for themselves. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The twitter files are solid evidence.

 

Hysterical attempts to try and smear a decades long famous liberal reporter because he dared to write about them is such a obvious exposure of the 

weak minded posters that we have here on PPP.

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Read it and weep? That article is your “evidence” that Taibbi’s reporting is false? Good god man. That article is nothing but a transcript of the hearing where bloviating politicians cut off “the witness” every time he speaks. Your blinders probably prevent you from noticing that every politician does the same regardless of party, and it’s pathetic. 
 

You have been told that Taibbi is bad and you are running with it. All despite not being able to highlight a single falsehood in his reporting. Someone your age should make more effort to think for themselves. 

Taibbi nor Shellenberger sought any "hidden" docs on twitter interference by trump or the right of which there is plenty to find.  They also received their info from an extremely biased source without question.   Hell, most of your haven't conceded that ol tuck is a liar despite irrefutable evidence.  Nothing I write will prompt your concession.  carry on with your bs...ugh, exhausting especially after helping host a party for over 200 last night.  There may have even been some MAGA's there.  We weren't wearing our Scarlet Letters (oops, has that book been banned?).

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Andrew McCarthy Lays Out What a Turkey the 'Nakedly Political' Case Is Against Trump

By Nick Arama

 

FTA:

 

Andrew McCarthy, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, into the phalanx of folks finding a big problem with such potential action. He’s not shy about it either. He wrote in his National Review column that the reported indictment against Trump was a “disgrace” and was a “nakedly political” move by a progressive prosecutor to benefit the Democratic party in the “long term.”

 

Bragg is engaged in bare-naked politics. The case is not merely unworthy as a prosecution of Trump (which is why federal prosecutors walked away from it years ago, as did Bragg before he was pressured by progressive Democrats into reviving it); it is also a case that everyone knows Bragg would never bring against anyone other than Trump.

 

Crime is rampant in New York, in part because Bragg’s default position is leniency and often non-prosecution when it comes to hardened criminals. Here, the case of falsifying business records against Trump…is, at best, a nonviolent misdemeanor that is stale and that could be inflated into a felony only by theories that are legally and factually dubious. This is a classic, invidious selective prosecution. It is being launched strictly for political purposes.

 

McCarthy also pointed out to Fox’s Brian Kilmeade that this case hinges on the testimony of Daniels and former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, both of whom have credibility problems.

 

“[Bragg] walked away from it Brian and my old office, the Southern District of New York, the federal prosecutors in Manhattan also wanted no part of this case, which hinges not only on the testimony of the porn star Stormy Daniels, who, you know, look, I think it’s credible for her to claim that this happened way back when, but at the same time, you know, she’s on record a couple of times saying it didn’t happen,” McCarthy said. “The other crucial witness here is Michael Cohen and I think, probably, the feds walked away from him because of his deep credibility problems. So you’re not starting out in a great place with those witnesses.”

 

Even folks like McCarthy who are not fans of Trump get what a ridiculous pile of bull cookies this case is and are willing to admit it. That says a lot about how desperate Democrats are with this move. There’s a lot of speculation as to what may be behind it — from trying to provoke the base to Democrats thinking that this will help Trump win the nomination and then they can defeat him in the general election. McCarthy speculates that the last point may be where Democrats might be going with this. That may be in someone’s mind. But that thought didn’t work out very well in 2016.

 

The bottom line is that whatever the move here is, it’s wrong, it’s political and everyone on all sides of the aisle should be calling it out.

 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/03/19/andrew-mccarthy-lays-out-what-a-turkey-the-nakedly-political-case-is-against-trump-n718456

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/progressive-democrat-braggs-motivation-in-nakedly-political-indictment-of-trump/

 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/03/18/jonathan-turley-destroys-the-d-a-s-case-against-trump-its-all-about-theatrics-n718332

 

 

 

 

 

.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

Taibbi nor Shellenberger sought any "hidden" docs on twitter interference by trump or the right of which there is plenty to find.  They also received their info from an extremely biased source without question.   Hell, most of your haven't conceded that ol tuck is a liar despite irrefutable evidence.  Nothing I write will prompt your concession.  carry on with your bs...ugh, exhausting especially after helping host a party for over 200 last night.  There may have even been some MAGA's there.  We weren't wearing our Scarlet Letters (oops, has that book been banned?).

Qualifies as a superspreader event unless you confirmed everyone was vaccinated. If you took that common sense precaution, you can be certain nobody could catch nor transmit deadly coronavirus. At a minimum I hope everyone did their part and stayed six feet apart. 
 

I will continue waiting patiently for the evidence of Taibbi reporting false information. No rush. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...