Jump to content

Step right up  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Was the proper result of the 2nd half opening kickoff

    • - a Bills TD
    • - a Bills safety
    • - a Texans touchback


Recommended Posts

Posted

I was really hesitating about my answer, TD or touchback.  I said touchback but I recall Tim Hasselback brought up a really good point, when a QB is kneeling to run out the clock, they actually take the knee.  What would happen if they didn't and just took the snap and just tossed the ball to the ref without kneeling?  At the heart of it, if you can't take the time to actually drop down to a knee really quick then maybe you deserve to live with the consequences.

Posted
  On 3/10/2020 at 10:46 PM, Sig1Hunter said:

Is he making an effort to advance while kneeling? I’d be interested to see that..

Expand  

It says kneeling without immediately attempting to advance the ball.  If he kneels and then immediately advances, it should be a live ball.  Immediately doesn’t have to be simultaneously.  In order to spike the ball to kill the clock without being called for grounding, the QB must take the snap and immediately spike the ball.  If there is a delay, it is grounding.  
 

Therefore, if we’re taking every rule to it’s illogical conclusion, a player should be allowed to take a knee and then immediately advance the ball.  Of course, that would be ridiculous.  Just as calling that play during the Texans game a touchdown would be seen as ridiculous by everyone who isn’t a Bills homer.

Posted
  On 3/10/2020 at 11:04 PM, GoBills808 said:

Yeah I don't think you understand the concept of kneeling

Expand  

Billl does point out a glaring weakness in the rule book.  What if a player takes a knee but many years later, on their death bed, wishes to advance the ball?  When is a play truly dead?

  On 3/10/2020 at 11:00 PM, Billl said:

It says kneeling without immediately attempting to advance the ball.  If he kneels and then immediately advances, it should be a live ball.  Immediately doesn’t have to be simultaneously.  In order to spike the ball to kill the clock without being called for grounding, the QB must take the snap and immediately spike the ball.  If there is a delay, it is grounding.  
 

Therefore, if we’re taking every rule to it’s illogical conclusion, a player should be allowed to take a knee and then immediately advance the ball.  Of course, that would be ridiculous.  Just as calling that play during the Texans game a touchdown would be seen as ridiculous by everyone who isn’t a Bills homer.

Expand  

If the return man takes a knee and then changes his mind and decides to run as you have brilliantly laid out, that would be too late since he has already "taken a knee and made no attempt to advance the ball."  This scenario is distinctly different than a ball carrier who takes off running, slips and inadvertently has a knee touch the ground while clearly attempting to advance the ball.

  On 3/10/2020 at 11:11 PM, Billl said:
Expand  

Comparison to the catch rule is a very poor analogy.  The definition of a catch is and has been incredibly subjective.  What is a football move? When is possession established? What is control?  What qualifies as survives the ground? This subjectivity has plagued the game and driven fans crazy.

 

Luckily, the rules governing dead balls on kickoffs are as clear as can be.  Or at least they were until "common sense" was introduced and "logic" prevailed.  

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/10/2020 at 11:15 PM, Jauronimo said:

Billl does point out a glaring weakness in the rule book.  What if a player takes a knee but many years later, on their death bed, wishes to advance the ball?  When is a play truly dead?

 

If the return man takes a knee and then changes his mind and decides to run as you have brilliantly laid out, that would be too late since he has already "taken a knee and made no attempt to advance the ball."  This scenario is distinctly different than a ball carrier who takes off running, slips and inadvertently has a knee touch the ground while clearly attempting to advance the ball.

Expand  

I think when the concepts 'immediately' and 'kneeling' are called into question it's fair game to ask whether the statute of limitations on returns after kneeling extends BEYOND death and into the afterlife. I suspect the 2020 update to the rulebook will take into account postmortem kickoff returns.

Posted
  On 3/10/2020 at 11:20 PM, Mr. WEO said:

What brings a man to re-mount such a well beaten horse?

 

Answer to the best of your ability....

Expand  

1. Its not nearly beaten enough if it can be re-mounted, in any sense of the word.  Definitely not by TBD standards.

2. This is completely Roy and Gugny's fault.

Posted
  On 3/10/2020 at 11:19 PM, GoBills808 said:

I think when the concepts 'immediately' and 'kneeling' are called into question it's fair game to ask whether the statute of limitations on returns after kneeling extends BEYOND death and into the afterlife. I suspect the 2020 update to the rulebook will take into account postmortem kickoff returns.

Expand  

What are you people talking about? When a team takes a knee at the end of the game or half...the player simply touches his knee to the ground, immediately get back up, and tosses the ball to the official. The play is over!  But....he DOES NOT take the ball from Center and toss it to the official WITHOUT first touching his knee to the ground.  That would be called a fumble!

Posted
  On 3/10/2020 at 11:30 PM, SoCal Deek said:

What are you people talking about? When a team takes a knee at the end of the game or half...the player simply touches his knee to the ground, immediately get back up, and tosses the ball to the official. The play is over!  But....he DOES NOT take the ball from Center and toss it to the official WITHOUT first touching his knee to the ground.  That would be called a fumble!

Expand  

I take it you've never witnessed someone simultaneously kneel and advance.

Posted
  On 3/10/2020 at 11:28 PM, Jauronimo said:

1. Its not nearly beaten enough if it can be re-mounted, in any sense of the word.  Definitely not by TBD standards.

2. This is completely Roy and Gugny's fault.

Expand  

 

 

That's what she said..

Posted

I can’t get involved in this again. I’m still so angered about how the refs blew this call and blew it in so many other ways. Could the Bills have won otherwise? Yes. Fact is the refs still boned us here though. 

Posted
  On 3/10/2020 at 11:00 PM, Billl said:

It says kneeling without immediately attempting to advance the ball.  If he kneels and then immediately advances, it should be a live ball.  Immediately doesn’t have to be simultaneously.  In order to spike the ball to kill the clock without being called for grounding, the QB must take the snap and immediately spike the ball.  If there is a delay, it is grounding.  
 

Therefore, if we’re taking every rule to it’s illogical conclusion, a player should be allowed to take a knee and then immediately advance the ball. 

Expand  

No. It doesn’t say kneeling and then making no effort to advance the ball. It says kneeling and making no effort to advance the ball. So, yes. It has to be done simultaneously. Either way, in the situation being discussed he didn’t kneel or go to the ground which is an expressly required element of downing the ball. This fact is not (legitimately) debatable.

Posted

It was a fumble and a touchdown. players fumble forward all the time, you would have to judge intent was a forward pass, This seems possible under a review for the official to rule pass, but i would disagree.

Posted
  On 3/11/2020 at 12:36 AM, Sig1Hunter said:

No. It doesn’t say kneeling and then making no effort to advance the ball. It says kneeling and making no effort to advance the ball. So, yes. It has to be done simultaneously. Either way, in the situation being discussed he didn’t kneel or go to the ground which is an expressly required element of downing the ball. This fact is not (legitimately) debatable.

Expand  

Then I guess the QB must simultaneously spike the ball while taking the snap.  Since this can’t be done, every spike ever should have been flagged for grounding.  There you go.

 

This is the dumbest conversation ever.  Feel free to think the refs screwed the Bills all you want.  They didn’t, and it doesn’t matter if they did.  The game is over, and no amount of railing against the use of common sense will change that.

Posted
  On 3/11/2020 at 12:48 AM, Billl said:

Then I guess the QB must simultaneously spike the ball while taking the snap.  Since this can’t be done, every spike ever should have been flagged for grounding.  There you go.

 

This is the dumbest conversation ever.  Feel free to think the refs screwed the Bills all you want.  They didn’t, and it doesn’t matter if they did.  The game is over, and no amount of railing against the use of common sense will change that.

Expand  

Huh? What rule are you quoting with that asinine statement?

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...