Koko78 Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 3 hours ago, Foxx said: why the need to have it behind closed doors? Especially since he has a right to public hearings - specifically so the government can't hide schiff. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, Foxx said: why the need to have it behind closed doors? https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1232111609973178369 They are probably just having cocktails and a good time. Edited February 25, 2020 by Albwan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 28 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Especially since he has a right to public hearings - specifically so the government can't hide schiff. Let's see if the judge puts out a gag order to the participants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Let's see if the judge puts out a gag order to the participants. Wouldn't surprise me if she did. This judge is increasingly acting fishy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 thread. not, "that Ginsberg"...... https://twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/1232403493136236544 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 thread. https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1232405036350738433 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 25, 2020 Author Share Posted February 25, 2020 Still guilty? Yup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 Just now, Tiberius said: Still guilty? Yup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 25, 2020 Author Share Posted February 25, 2020 5 minutes ago, Foxx said: Wtf is that one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 Long thread 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Wtf is that one? Borg assimilation, duh. Edited February 25, 2020 by Foxx 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albwan Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 On 2/23/2020 at 12:02 PM, njbuff said: Another thing that the common folk will ask about this is............ Why is Roger Stone going to jail for lying about something that’s a total lie (Russian collusion delusion)? Since when is being an unlikable dick with NO criminal record tantamount to a prison sentence? It will help morons like the author of this post to keep the russia - mueller narrative up their sleeve to bring up when they have nothing else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 8 minutes ago, Albwan said: It will help morons like the author of this post to keep the russia - mueller narrative up their sleeve to bring up when they have nothing else. The whole thing is just nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 8 minutes ago, njbuff said: The whole thing is just nuts. ...perhaps a judge trying to save face?......could first step have been lowering the prison sentence?......need Counselor KOKO 78 on this one......aren't opposing counsels responsible for vetting prospective jurors?.....I've been on juries and the potential judge had zero input.......OR.....am I wrong??..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 5 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...perhaps a judge trying to save face?......could first step have been lowering the prison sentence?......need Counselor KOKO 78 on this one......aren't opposing counsels responsible for vetting prospective jurors?.....I've been on juries and the potential judge had zero input.......OR.....am I wrong??..... I would say that I should just leave all of this to the legal experts, but the system is politically corrupt nowadays that we can't trust them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 9 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...perhaps a judge trying to save face?......could first step have been lowering the prison sentence?......need Counselor KOKO 78 on this one......aren't opposing counsels responsible for vetting prospective jurors?.....I've been on juries and the potential judge had zero input.......OR.....am I wrong??..... Not sure how involved the judge is in federal jury trials, though I do know it's tougher to toss a juror than a state-level trial. However, trying to go through the social media history of well over a dozen prospective jurors, in the span of a couple minutes, is virtually impossible. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Not sure how involved the judge is in federal jury trials, though I do know it's tougher to toss a juror than a state-level trial. However, trying to go through the social media history of well over a dozen prospective jurors, in the span of a couple minutes, is virtually impossible. ...so a double standard as in Federal vs State level?....how shocking...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 26, 2020 Share Posted March 26, 2020 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2020 Author Share Posted April 16, 2020 More Top Stories BREAKING NEWS Roger Stone retrial request denied as judge rejects claims jury forewoman was biased The ruling came after President Trump issued public statements stoking controversy over his confidant’s case by attacking the integrity of the judge, jurors, federal prosecutors and the judicial system. By Matt Zapotosky and Spencer S. Hsu 14 minutes ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 16, 2020 Share Posted April 16, 2020 Stone was denied a new trial. Can he appeal? He's scheduled to report in 14 days (as they let out murderers due to COVID-19). Will Trump pardon him if he cannot appeal? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts