Jump to content

The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19


Hedge

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, whatdrought said:


But he is a public health EXPERT! His flipping is so educated. 
 

Plus, what reason would an epidemiologist ever have for making an epidemic seem worse than it is? I mean, clearly all epidemiologists just want all epidemics to go away so they never have to bother being the center of attention for months at a time....

Wow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JetsFan20 said:


Dr Fauchi pretty much shot this idea that the virus is weaker down today. There is no evidence that’s the case right now. 
 

These politicians are not public health officials. This thing is still out there and until we have it under control you should probably avoid public public places without a mask. 

that's right

just look at the recovery stats which clearly show this trend

oh wait- there are no published stats that show daily hospital admits, releases, recoveries, treatments that work in the field, treatments  that don't work, etc 

 

why is that?

so the EXPERTS can say whatever they want at any given time

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Foxx said:

so... has the Kung Flu spiked now that we are down the road quite a few days from the riots?

Trump Tulsa mini rally will be a super spreader event. Might kill a whole bunch of people. 

 

Death and failure follow in Trump’s large wake 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Trump Tulsa mini rally will be a super spreader event. Might kill a whole bunch of people. 

 

Death and failure follow in Trump’s large wake 

lol.

 

never change, tibs... never change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

There is some guessing in PCR when initially building an assay, you're right.  When designing primers for the target sequence you are attempting to amplify you have to try a few to see what pairs work best, but you are designing primers for specific conserved sequences of the viral genome.based on the known sequences. Once you get a good pair of primers in your assay design work then you have established a highly specific and sensitive test for detecting the pathogen of interest.  In the case of covid19 they are amplifying the region that encodes the nucelocapsid.  These primers are designed to be specific to the covid19 nucelocapsid sequence only.  In other words, the test will not amplify RNA from other coronaviruses that may be present in the sample. It will not amplify human or bacterial genetic material.  It will not amplify RNA from other viruses.  It's highly specific to covid19 and only covid19.  Each time they run a series of tests they include controls.  A positive control of purified covid19 RNA that should flag positive.  If it doesn't, the test and all the patient samples included in that run need to be retested.  They will also include a negative control.  This control could be a no template control, where there is no RNA/DNA in the reaction mix at all.  Or they could use a nonsense template and include RNA from a non covid virus , like flu.  I often used bacterial genetic material for negative controls in flu PCR that I did.  This control should be negative, and if it isn't all the samples run on that series are invalid and need to be re-tested.

 

Watch the video again and look at the graphs where they show how the signal comes up when they add increasing numbers of viral copies into the sample mix.  There's a negative control in there that does not show any signal after 45 or so cycles, indicating no amplification of the covid19 target sequence.  The other samples of 200, 20 and 2 copies turn positive in a step-wise manner as you would expect.  The threshold where a sample is called positive is the Ct (cycle threshold) number, or the number of cycles necessary for the fluorescent signal to exceed the background noise. 

 

If you're searching for curtains to look behind, I'd highly suggest that you look elsewhere.  PCR has long been a well established and robust technology.  

so how does the actual test work

what happens in the lab after a person is swabbed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday, Monday, saw only one state (NY) register over fifty Covid 19 deaths (53) and only eight states were in double digits meaning 42 were not, with 13 registering ZERO deaths. Yet another pandemic low point! I can’t wait to see what type of spin the national media puts on it today. How do  they keep the fear and public shaming going for another few months? How long is it until the first Tuesday in November?

Edited by SoCal Deek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, shoshin said:

 

It will take 4-6 weeks to see any big rise post protest. That's the exponential effect. But I don't expect to see much. Cases were low in many of those cities, lots of masks, outdoors, younger, etc. Working indoors, no masks will prob have more impact.

 

We're well into week 5

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

Horowitz: All the ways the media is misleading you about a record spike in Florida

"Recently, the New Yorker warned that in Florida, 12,673 people are hospitalized with coronavirus. The media is still trying to give you the impression that Florida has become like New York City at its peak, when roughly the same number were hospitalized with COVID-19 in early April. In fact, Florida never had more than 2,000 people hospitalized at once, just 3.5% of capacity. The 12,673 is the cumulative number since March. Florida still has far fewer people in ICUs than it did during its peak, which was itself was much milder than the peak in many other states."

 

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-ways-media-misleading-record-spike-florida/

 

 

 

More people have died in Florida of Corona virus than were killed in NYC on 9-11 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

More people have died in Florida of Corona virus than were killed in NYC on 9-11 

 

So?

 

More people are killed by drunk drivers every year than died on 9-11.

 

More POC were killed in Chicago over the weekend then killed by cops this year.

Edited by Gary M
  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gary M said:

 

So?

 

More POC were killed in Chicago over the weekend then killed by cops this year.

I know, we do need police reform. If the people could trust the cops there wouldn't be as much crime. 

Just now, Reality Check said:

 

You are dumb 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

I know, we do need police reform. If the people could trust the cops there wouldn't be as much crime. 

You are dumb 

 

Talking to yourself again?

 

People in Chicago are killing each other because of distrust of cops?

 

Man that's some stupid *****

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gary M said:

 

Talking to yourself again?

 

People in Chicago are killing each other because of distrust of cops?

 

Man that's some stupid *****

If the public doesn't trust the police then the criminals win and the public loses. 

Edited by Tiberius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...