3rdnlng Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 1 minute ago, row_33 said: enhancement at the very least i guess some dudes can have a full inch beard filled in with less than two weeks growth, he's not the right demographic though his father lost his hair by his early 30s, i wouldn't be surprised if there's a ton of patch work going on with the son The amount of hair is usually passed on through the mother's side and we all know Justin's mother had a carpet worthy of a Musk Oxen's coat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 (edited) i'll put this in @Tiberius's thread. so he can cry here. thread. https://twitter.com/Doranimated/status/1215600795602837505 Edited January 10, 2020 by Foxx 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: The amount of hair is usually passed on through the mother's side and we all know Justin's mother had a carpet worthy of a Musk Oxen's coat. there's rules of thumb and then the randomness of reality comes into play, so the exceptions can be excused away, but it's not an exception when observation shows your hair potential is a flip of the coin. actually this works on almost anything observable... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 3 minutes ago, row_33 said: there's rules of thumb and then the randomness of reality comes into play, so the exceptions can be excused away, but it's not an exception when observation shows your hair potential is a flip of the coin. actually this works on almost anything observable... Well, good old Margaret certainly made it observable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Well, good old Margaret certainly made it observable. it was the 70s doooooooooooooooooo..... she had many moons to cultivate that display i am in no position to posit theories for anyone else's situation..... Edited January 10, 2020 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 10 minutes ago, row_33 said: it was the 70s doooooooooooooooooo..... she had many moons to cultivate that display i am in no position to posit theories for anyone else's situation..... I understand that Pierre was not her favorite bush pilot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: I understand that Pierre was not her favorite bush pilot. nobody knew what he was really thinking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 10, 2020 Author Share Posted January 10, 2020 53 minutes ago, Foxx said: i'll put this in @Tiberius's thread. so he can cry here. thread. https://twitter.com/Doranimated/status/1215600795602837505 Were we closer to war now or then? Was Iran building a bomb now or then? Is the whole situation more dangerous now or then? Now is the answer to all three question. Why am I suppose to be crying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 29 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Were we closer to war now or then? Was Iran building a bomb now or then? Is the whole situation more dangerous now or then? Now is the answer to all three question. Why am I suppose to be crying? because there is one less terrorist in the world and it has become exponentially safer as a result? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakin Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Were we closer to war now or then? Was Iran building a bomb now or then? Is the whole situation more dangerous now or then? Now is the answer to all three question. Why am I suppose to be crying? About the same probably both about the same difference is - Iran is shitting it’s pants and they have one less killer of Americans on their staff. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 12 minutes ago, Bakin said: About the same probably both about the same difference is - Iran is shitting it’s pants and they have one less killer of Americans on their staff. Difference is that Iran has been separated from its proxies and is now being held responsible for not only the proxies but their own actions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 6 hours ago, anita_03 said: here I've found some info regarding war This is what you do with your first post? You quote someone who made a post (must have been from another thread) which predates this entire thread You don't even quote it -- you delete the content of it so that nobody knows what you're responding to. And your response is to link a news site that's in Spanish. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 4 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Frogs. Frogs of war too. "Brekekekex coax coax." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 10, 2020 Author Share Posted January 10, 2020 1 hour ago, Bakin said: About the same probably both about the same difference is - Iran is shitting it’s pants and they have one less killer of Americans on their staff. Being closer to war, hostility and no diplomacy is the same as before? No, no it is not. You guys will say anything 1 hour ago, Foxx said: because there is one less terrorist in the world and it has become exponentially safer as a result? There is also one less airliner, too. Iran making a bomb makes us safer? You guys--YOUR GUYS (politicians)--need to be thrown out of office. I hope this demographic shift taking places seriously causes the GOP to shrink and become impotent. You guys screamed Hillary is a warmonger while electing a clueless clown who is getting us back into the hot war game. The GOP must go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 17 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Iran making a bomb makes us safer? Who paid for it? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 been making a bomb for 40 years now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 1 minute ago, row_33 said: been making a bomb for 40 years now i still remember in 1985, when Iran was "five years away" from having a nuclear bomb. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 10, 2020 Author Share Posted January 10, 2020 8 minutes ago, Gary M said: Who paid for it? What do you care? You just want a war, right? And that won't pay for a nuke, anyway 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: i still remember in 1985, when Iran was "five years away" from having a nuclear bomb. I remember 2017 when international inspectors where in Iran certifying they were in compliance with the Obama deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said: i still remember in 1985, when Iran was "five years away" from having a nuclear bomb. reset the prediction it all the time, just like the glaciers melting away and they never learn.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I remember 2017 when international inspectors where in Iran certifying they were in compliance with the Obama deal. HMMMM https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/09/13/549217764/should-nuclear-inspectors-be-demanding-access-to-irans-military-sites FTA: "Nobody is allowed to visit Iran's military sites," Ali Akbar Velayati told reporters in Iran recently, calling the push for such inspections a threat to its national security. Velayati is an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts