Jump to content

Trump's 4th of July Speech thread


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ha! No link! Open source reporting. 

 

You seriously don't know about that? Why are you here talking about politics if you are so ignorant about current events? ...

in other words, you got nothing.

amiright?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Foxx said:

in other words, you got nothing.

amiright?

It's kind of a good, but dishonest strategy. Just keep asking for links and playing dumb, but I'll just call it out before I yet again show proof, wash rinse and little ignorant Tom blue will come back and ask again as if he has never even heard of Russia. I like answering this way better. (Keep asking!) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ha! No link! Open source reporting. 

 

You seriously don't know about that? Why are you here talking about politics if you are so ignorant about current events? 

Lol, way, way better than being an ignorant Trump cultist. 

 

Those idiots that went to D.C. to listen to Trumps pathetic ramblings as he read like a 7th grader off the TelePrompTer is would should make you sad, but I imagine you almost envy them. Sad 

..."cultist"?.....best you can do?......why advertise your ignorance and intolerance?...I see this forum as a civil debate of opposing political views (don't stray here often)...the "to and fro" debate with respect is what the hell is supposed to make this place work......your inclusion in any type of civility is a genuine lost cause because you have all the answers, any and all opposing views are met with condescending adjectives and an attitude of supremacy...your repulsive ilk is EXACTLY what is wrong with this country.....PATHETIC is an overstatement.......wow.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

..."cultist"?.....best you can do?......why advertise your ignorance and intolerance?...I see this forum as a civil debate of opposing political views (don't stray here often)...the "to and fro" debate with respect is what the hell is supposed to make this place work......your inclusion in any type of civility is a genuine lost cause because you have all the answers, any and all opposing views are met with condescending adjectives and an attitude of supremacy...your repulsive ilk is EXACTLY what is wrong with this country.....PATHETIC is an overstatement.......wow.....

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Those idiots that went to D.C. to listen to Trumps pathetic ramblings as he read like a 7th grader off the TelePrompTer is would should make you sad, but I imagine you almost envy them. Sad 

 

I'm glad to see that you're concerned about the welfare of the crowd, after Trump crushed them with tanks Tienanmen Square-style. I mean, that still happened, right? We heard for a week how it was going to happen, so it still happened, right? Please tell me God-Emperor Trump still crushed the pathetic plebeians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

OSINT doesn’t mean no links. It requires links and vetting. 

 

But isn't it past the point where we need links, I've posted links on that very subject many, many times. The playing dumb act is just willful ignorance, isn't it? 

 

 

Just now, Koko78 said:

 

I'm glad to see that you're concerned about the welfare of the crowd, after Trump crushed them with tanks Tienanmen Square-style. I mean, that still happened, right? We heard for a week how it was going to happen, so it still happened, right? Please tell me God-Emperor Trump still crushed the pathetic plebeians.

Are you drunk? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

 

But isn't it past the point where we need links, I've posted links on that very subject many, many times. The playing dumb act is just willful ignorance, isn't it? 

 

I'll agree if you agree the same about voluminous amount of primary source material, testimony, and documentation I've linked over the past two years which show the whole Russia/Trump thing was contrived for political, partisan reasons by the previous administration, the DOJ, FBI, CIA, and establishment media...

 

Deal?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I'll agree if you agree the same about voluminous amount of primary source material, testimony, and documentation I've linked over the past two years which show the whole Russia/Trump thing was contrived for political, partisan reasons by the previous administration, the DOJ, FBI, CIA, and establishment media...

 

Deal?

I'm reminded of the scene from The Life of Brian when they are discussing their ransom demands: If the Romans here in Judea do not agree to total dismemberment of the Roman Empire we will kill the hostage! 

 

So no deal! Sorry. 

3 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Yes.

You are the best! :thumbsup:

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ha! No link! Open source reporting. 

 

You seriously don't know about that? Why are you here talking about politics if you are so ignorant about current events? 

 

I know it never happened.  They never hacked voting machines, equipment makers, or "voting books."  

 

They spearphished some election officials in Volusia county.  That's probably what you're misunderstanding.  You idiot.  :lol:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

But isn't it past the point where we need links, I've posted links on that very subject many, many times. The playing dumb act is just willful ignorance, isn't it? ...

yeah, no. there are times when someone might want to follow the sourced material to get a better understanding of the context so,  you know... it can be found out for oneself whether one is being disingenuous or not.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

I know it never happened.  They never hacked voting machines, equipment makers, or "voting books."  

 

They spearphished some election officials in Volusia county.  That's probably what you're misunderstanding.  You idiot.  :lol:

If only the FBI Police would get out there and protect all those Federal Voting Machines! Maybe call up the Federal Reserves too.

Edited by 3rdnlng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

I know it never happened.  They never hacked voting machines, equipment makers, or "voting books."  

 

They spearphished some election officials in Volusia county.  That's probably what you're misunderstanding.  You idiot.  :lol:

 

McConnell is refusing to bring to a vote any bill to safeguard the elections from foreign attack. Why do you believe that is or do you not believe that to be true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

McConnell is refusing to bring to a vote any bill to safeguard the elections from foreign attack. Why do you believe that is or do you not believe that to be true?

 

Why did the previous administration order their cyber chief to "stand down" at the height of the Russian "attack" on the election?

 

During a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho, asked Daniel about a passage in the book Russian Roluette. The passage was about a staffer from Daniel's team, Daniel Prieto, retelling the time that Obama's national security adviser Susan Rice told Daniel and his team to halt their efforts and to "stand down" in countering Russia's cyberattacks.

 

Daniel was quoted saying to his team that they had to stop working on options to counter the Russian attack: "We've been told to stand down." Prieto is quoted as being "incredulous and in disbelief" and asking, "Why the hell are we standing down?"

 

"That is an accurate rendering of the conversation at the staff meeting..."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/reluctant-witnesses-in-fisa-abuse-probe-agree-to-talk-to-doj-inspector-general

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

McConnell is refusing to bring to a vote any bill to safeguard the elections from foreign attack. Why do you believe that is or do you not believe that to be true?

 

 

It is not true, 

 

you are only providing a small amount of what is occuring in the senate.

 

and for that matter, what the hell bill CAN they pass that safeguards elections from all foreign attacks,

 

ID needed ?

 

Less time for pre-voting ?

 

prevent Vote Harvesting ?

 

See if the virtuous democrats will sign on to those................

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Kemp said:

 

McConnell is refusing to bring to a vote any bill to safeguard the elections from foreign attack. Why do you believe that is or do you not believe that to be true?

 

What are you trying to argue, that McConnell is Putin's agent too?

 

He's doing so because he believes - and the Constitution says - that the mechanics of elections are the purview of state and local authorities, not the federal government.  You may not disagree with him.  But that is his reason, and it is a cogent and legally supportable one.  Arguing "because he wants Russia to interfere in our elections" is childish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Why did the previous administration order their cyber chief to "stand down" at the height of the Russian "attack" on the election?

 

During a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho, asked Daniel about a passage in the book Russian Roluette. The passage was about a staffer from Daniel's team, Daniel Prieto, retelling the time that Obama's national security adviser Susan Rice told Daniel and his team to halt their efforts and to "stand down" in countering Russia's cyberattacks.

 

Daniel was quoted saying to his team that they had to stop working on options to counter the Russian attack: "We've been told to stand down." Prieto is quoted as being "incredulous and in disbelief" and asking, "Why the hell are we standing down?"

 

"That is an accurate rendering of the conversation at the staff meeting..."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/reluctant-witnesses-in-fisa-abuse-probe-agree-to-talk-to-doj-inspector-general

 

 

You answered a question with a question.

 

I'll try and answer your questions, but  not if you avoid mine.

Edited by Kemp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...