Jump to content

Operation Boomerang AG Barr's Investigation of Acts of Treason by Federal Employees


Recommended Posts

;)

 

Sarah has done it all, prosecuting violent criminals, drug traffickers, financial fraudsters, corrupt public officials, and a wide variety of other wrongdoers. Given the breadth of her experience and her exceptional lawyering skills, she certainly will be a standout as our new criminal chief.”

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

;)

 

Sarah has done it all, prosecuting violent criminals, drug traffickers, financial fraudsters, corrupt public officials, and a wide variety of other wrongdoers. Given the breadth of her experience and her exceptional lawyering skills, she certainly will be a standout as our new criminal chief.”

Another do nothing job on the public dole produced by Beardy McGee who has still produced literally nothing while he bides time until Jan 20 2021 or Jan 20 2025.  This broad is replacing a guy that just became a judge after doing zero while under Beardy.  Nice reward a-hole.  These people are garbage.

Edited by 4merper4mer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

John Brennan: Cancel the State of the Union, blames impeachment

 by Karen Townsend

 

Original Article

 

Former CIA Director John Brennan is an unabashed member of The Resistance. He and the rest of the Trump-hating left are bitterly clinging to the hope that a miracle will occur in the impeachment trial. Nothing short of a vote in the Senate to affirm that the president is guilty of the charges before them will suffice. Then, of course, President Trump must be removed from office. Reality is slowly setting in for men like Brennan. President Trump will not be voted guilty in the Senate and he will not be removed from office. He will serve out the rest of his term.

 

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Once and Future Scandal

by Victor Davis Hanson

Original Article

 

Now that the four-and-a-half-month-long Ukraine impeachment bookend to the 22-month Mueller charade is over, it clearly accomplished nothing other than substantially raising the polls of both Donald Trump and the Republican Party. The public was reminded that Representative Gerald Nadler (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) are every bit as childish, peevish, and absurd as Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).

 

So, we are now back to the existential issue of the entire Trump phenomenon: to what degree did the Hillary Clinton campaign collude with high-ranking Obama officials, and the top echelons of the FBI, CIA, and the national intelligence apparatus, to surveil, defame, and hope to derail Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign by unlawful means?  

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

Stillllll waiting lol ??

 

For what?

 

Evidence of illegal surveillance and serious crimes being committed in the name of political spying?

(Already proven/released: https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf )

 

Or for the entire upper echelon of the FBI/DOJ under 44 to be referred to the DOJ for criminal prosecution?

(Already happened)

 

Or for a federal probe with indictment/investigatory power to be unleashed?

(In progress)

 

 

... The question to ask someone like you, someone who seemingly thought the Trump/Russia story was the end of our republic, why aren't you outraged at the abuses uncovered to date? Are they not big enough for you? (It's just a coup, no biggie)? Or is it that the media continues to lie to you and you keep listening because you've learned nothing about their agenda since 2016? 

 

Could it be that you're overlooking the biggest scandal in US history simply because you've been programmed NOT to look at it? 

 

That can't be, right? You're too smart for that. 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

For what?

 

Evidence of illegal surveillance and serious crimes being committed in the name of political spying?

(Already proven/released: https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf )

 

Or for the entire upper echelon of the FBI/DOJ under 44 to be referred to the DOJ for criminal prosecution?

(Already happened)

 

Or for a federal probe with indictment/investigatory power to be unleashed?

(In progress)

 

 

... The question to ask someone like you, someone who seemingly thought the Trump/Russia story was the end of our republic, why aren't you outraged at the abuses uncovered to date? Are they not big enough for you? (It's just a coup, no biggie)? Or is it that the media continues to lie to you and you keep listening because you've learned nothing about their agenda since 2016? 

 

Could it be that you're overlooking the biggest scandal in US history simply because you've been programmed NOT to look at it? 

 

That can't be, right? You're too smart for that. 

 


i am on record saying there was nothing to the Russian conspiracy.  It sounded false from day one.

 

i am on record saying there will be no arrests to all the big names allegedly behind a coup.  It sounds childish and laughable.

 

ill be right on both of these...two for two baby

 

 

(I even said from early on that Trump would be impeached, and many of you laughed at that, for the Ukraine issue.  But that nothing would come of it as it doesn’t rise to warranting removing someone from us.  God I am good at these predictions)

Edited by Crayola64
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:


i am on record saying there was nothing to the Russian conspiracy.  It sounded false from day one.

 

i am on record saying there will be no arrests to all the big names allegedly behind a coup.  It sounds childish and laughable.

 

ill be right on both of these...two for two baby

 

 

(I even said from early on that Trump would be impeached, and many of you laughed at that, for the Ukraine issue.  But that nothing would come of it as it doesn’t rise to warranting removing someone from us.  God I am good at these predictions)

 

All that and you still dodged the question. 

 

The question isn't whether Trump/Russia was false -- of course it was. The question was how did it start, who pushed it, and was it done for partisan political (and illegal) reasons? The evidence says yes. You don't say a word about it... why? 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...