row_33 Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 (edited) 8 hours ago, DC Tom said: A Russian spy! Played by a man born in Glasgow Edited May 7, 2019 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 criminal • Hundreds of ex-Justice Department officials put out an extraordinary open letter saying if he weren't President, Trump would be facing multiple obstruction of justice charges, based on what's in special counsel Robert Mueller's report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Tibs, there are a lot of things a President can do that would be considered criminal if you did them. Go ahead...try and declare war on another country. Next! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 20 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Tibs, there are a lot of things a President can do that would be considered criminal if you did them. Go ahead...try and declare war on another country. Next! It carries huge powers and responsibilities, that office Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 18 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Tibs, there are a lot of things a President can do that would be considered criminal if you did them. Go ahead...try and declare war on another country. Next! It's quite a world the dems live in. Attempt to brand a president a traitor to the country, use media sources to spread disinformation, work to assign a SC to perpetuate the fraud, and watch it all evaporate when the only traitors to be found are members of their own cabal. Then, feign outrage over the thought crimes and trot out some ridiculous statement about some nameless insiders purporting to be outraged over charges that would never pass muster. Kavanaugh hearing where a good and decent public servant is torn to shreds. Trump, a less good and less decent man is branded a traitor based on nothing more than conjecture and political animus. I am really struggling to think how the old school dems with standards could support these leftists. I know many will, but what's the next new low for them--public hangings? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: but what's the next new low for them--public hangings? They’re presently focused on public shaming. I’m guessing that’ll wear off as the country begins to tune out fake news and viral social media garbage. Then...we’ll all see how their censorship evolves but it’s not looking good for the future of the nation under the iron fist of these intolerant ‘woke’ types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 57 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: It's quite a world the dems live in. Attempt to brand a president a traitor to the country, use media sources to spread disinformation, work to assign a SC to perpetuate the fraud, and watch it all evaporate when the only traitors to be found are members of their own cabal. Then, feign outrage over the thought crimes and trot out some ridiculous statement about some nameless insiders purporting to be outraged over charges that would never pass muster. Kavanaugh hearing where a good and decent public servant is torn to shreds. Trump, a less good and less decent man is branded a traitor based on nothing more than conjecture and political animus. I am really struggling to think how the old school dems with standards could support these leftists. I know many will, but what's the next new low for them--public hangings? none are competent enough to tie a proper knot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Rule of law? The letter explains: The Mueller report describes several acts that satisfy all of the elements for an obstruction charge: conduct that obstructed or attempted to obstruct the truth-finding process, as to which the evidence of corrupt intent and connection to pending proceedings is overwhelming. These include: · The President’s efforts to fire [special counsel Robert S.] Mueller and to falsify evidence about that effort; · The President’s efforts to limit the scope of Mueller’s investigation to exclude his conduct; and · The President’s efforts to prevent witnesses from cooperating with investigators probing him and his campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 anything yet? too bad we couldn't have sold short on a stock based on found collusion, libs would have pumped it up to $120,000 a share. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Bromwich is a clown/cabal/deep stater to his core. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Not a shock. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 1 hour ago, row_33 said: anything yet? too bad we couldn't have sold short on a stock based on found collusion, libs would have pumped it up to $120,000 a share. Tibs is trying to push it to 1M per share. Too bad that Tibs in reality maybe has two nickels to rub together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Surely, they have got him this time! There has to be SOMETHING he can be impeached for from 20-30 years ago, right? They even have him on tape admitting it! (clip below) 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 9 hours ago, Hedge said: Surely, they have got him this time! There has to be SOMETHING he can be impeached for from 20-30 years ago, right? They even have him on tape admitting it! (clip below) So where was Trump getting all this money to lose? Russia? If he was losing all this money, he must have been getting cash from somewhere to make it up. Bankrupting casinos is an expensive business! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: So where was Trump getting all this money to lose? Russia? If he was losing all this money, he must have been getting cash from somewhere to make it up. Bankrupting casinos is an expensive business! IRS can only go back 7 years from today. Are you advocating that the IRS can go several decades back? If they go back for Trump then they can go back for the Clinton's, Biden, Obama, etc.. All that aside losing money does not mean a person is a tax evader. Guys like Trump pay an army of accountants so they stay within the boundaries of the tax code. If the federal govt is dumb enough to encode something then we can't be surprised if somebody takes advantage of it. Care to show where it was against federal law back in the 1980's to do business in Russia? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 22 hours ago, RochesterRob said: Tibs is trying to push it to 1M per share. Too bad that Tibs in reality maybe has two nickels to rub together. imagine the joy of selling short on $1,000,000 shares built on liberal stupidity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: IRS can only go back 7 years from today. Are you advocating that the IRS can go several decades back? If they go back for Trump then they can go back for the Clinton's, Biden, Obama, etc.. All that aside losing money does not mean a person is a tax evader. Guys like Trump pay an army of accountants so they stay within the boundaries of the tax code. If the federal govt is dumb enough to encode something then we can't be surprised if somebody takes advantage of it. Care to show where it was against federal law back in the 1980's to do business in Russia? Where was he getting all this money that he was losing? That's the question. How can one person lose a billion dollars?? Maybe he was laundering Russian money. Just asking. He bankrupted casinos, the guy is obviously incompetent and we already know he doesn't obey laws. So I'm just putting two and two together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Where was he getting all this money that he was losing? That's the question. How can one person lose a billion dollars?? Maybe he was laundering Russian money. Just asking. He bankrupted casinos, the guy is obviously incompetent and we already know he doesn't obey laws. So I'm just putting two and two together. From US investors. At that time he was a part of the USFL which required big money. Trump was connected to Jim Kelly so maybe Kelly even invested 10's of thousands into Trump's ventures. People lose billions quite frequently. Try buying the WSJ on a regular basis and then you would know details. The new casino in the Finger Lakes region is a financially sick operation and has been since it opened. The owner has been courting the state for relief money. The Soviets back during the 1980's did not have a billion to give a Western capitalist billionaire nor would they give it to him if they had it. Trump was the furthest thing from being a potential political figure then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: From US investors. At that time he was a part of the USFL which required big money. Trump was connected to Jim Kelly so maybe Kelly even invested 10's of thousands into Trump's ventures. People lose billions quite frequently. Try buying the WSJ on a regular basis and then you would know details. The new casino in the Finger Lakes region is a financially sick operation and has been since it opened. The owner has been courting the state for relief money. The Soviets back during the 1980's did not have a billion to give a Western capitalist billionaire nor would they give it to him if they had it. Trump was the furthest thing from being a potential political figure then. I wouldn't be surprised if it was that he only cheated his investors for awhile. That might be true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts