DC Tom Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 5 minutes ago, LaDexter said: FALSE You're more of a Lenny, anyway. Go pet your !@#$ing mouse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 Let's take another look at LBJ.... We now have all three families disputing the "official" events of the three LBJ/JEH (J Edgar Hoover) murders - JFK, MLK, and RFK. Jackie O named LBJ when asked who offed her husband. MLK's family came out in 1998 and said KKKer James Earl Ray couldn't have done it and hence LBJ/JEH did. Most recently, RFK jr, a seriously deranged dumbass, met with Sirhan Sirhan and declared that he couldn't have done it. In each murder, there was a "master marksman" taking out the target and a "stooge" set up as the "fall guy." What was LBJ really after? If you guessed ZIONISM, you win the prize. In 1967, LBJ got on TV and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself while taking the Heights, Strip, and Bank. Like all things Zionist, that was not true.... The actual CIA dossier.... https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol49no1/html_files/arab_israeli_war_1.html "Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move" Indeed, LBJ's entire escalation of the Vietnam war was solely to run our military factories, take those new weapons,give them to Israel free of charge, and give our troops older outdated weapons that failed and jammed. LBJ didn't want Vietnam to end. Vietnam was the perfect "smoke" for the "re-conquest of the Promised Land." Like the other President Johnson, LBJ got to the WH by participating in the assassination of his boss. The last name "John" is Jewish. "Johnson" can be Jewish. And that explains why LBJ didn't care at all about the crew of the USS Liberty.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 4 minutes ago, LaDexter said: Let's take another look at LBJ.... We now have all three families disputing the "official" events of the three LBJ/JEH (J Edgar Hoover) murders - JFK, MLK, and RFK. Jackie O named LBJ when asked who offed her husband. MLK's family came out in 1998 and said KKKer James Earl Ray couldn't have done it and hence LBJ/JEH did. Most recently, RFK jr, a seriously deranged dumbass, met with Sirhan Sirhan and declared that he couldn't have done it. In each murder, there was a "master marksman" taking out the target and a "stooge" set up as the "fall guy." What was LBJ really after? If you guessed ZIONISM, you win the prize. In 1967, LBJ got on TV and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself while taking the Heights, Strip, and Bank. Like all things Zionist, that was not true.... The actual CIA dossier.... https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol49no1/html_files/arab_israeli_war_1.html "Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move" Indeed, LBJ's entire escalation of the Vietnam war was solely to run our military factories, take those new weapons,give them to Israel free of charge, and give our troops older outdated weapons that failed and jammed. LBJ didn't want Vietnam to end. Vietnam was the perfect "smoke" for the "re-conquest of the Promised Land." Like the other President Johnson, LBJ got to the WH by participating in the assassination of his boss. The last name "John" is Jewish. "Johnson" can be Jewish. And that explains why LBJ didn't care at all about the crew of the USS Liberty.... You're a sterno drinker, aren't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 Why do you think LBJ lied about the 67 war? LOL!!! As if DC Tom didn't already know.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 15 minutes ago, LaDexter said: FALSE No, I'd be shocked if I was wrong. I'm pretty sure you are the former GEORGE, the anti-Semitic. You got banned once for yourshit and I'm sure it will happen again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 7 minutes ago, LaDexter said: Why do you think LBJ lied about the 67 war? LOL!!! As if DC Tom didn't already know.... I didn't know LBJ was Jewish?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 13 minutes ago, LaDexter said: Let's take another look at LBJ.... We now have all three families disputing the "official" events of the three LBJ/JEH (J Edgar Hoover) murders - JFK, MLK, and RFK. Jackie O named LBJ when asked who offed her husband. MLK's family came out in 1998 and said KKKer James Earl Ray couldn't have done it and hence LBJ/JEH did. Most recently, RFK jr, a seriously deranged dumbass, met with Sirhan Sirhan and declared that he couldn't have done it. In each murder, there was a "master marksman" taking out the target and a "stooge" set up as the "fall guy." What was LBJ really after? If you guessed ZIONISM, you win the prize. In 1967, LBJ got on TV and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself while taking the Heights, Strip, and Bank. Like all things Zionist, that was not true.... The actual CIA dossier.... https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol49no1/html_files/arab_israeli_war_1.html "Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move" Indeed, LBJ's entire escalation of the Vietnam war was solely to run our military factories, take those new weapons,give them to Israel free of charge, and give our troops older outdated weapons that failed and jammed. LBJ didn't want Vietnam to end. Vietnam was the perfect "smoke" for the "re-conquest of the Promised Land." Like the other President Johnson, LBJ got to the WH by participating in the assassination of his boss. The last name "John" is Jewish. "Johnson" can be Jewish. And that explains why LBJ didn't care at all about the crew of the USS Liberty.... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 What is truly funny is that EVERYTHING I have posted here is true, and that is why you treasonous Zionist bigots only resort to name calling and calls for censorship... Einstein's warning Israeli media documenting Gaddafi was JEWISH - what does that mean about Benghazi?? - who was pissed Gaddafi was overthrown??? A: ISRAEL photos of Col Ossman CIA dossier of 67 war Perhaps a list of things we can't read or look at... you are not anti-semitic if you self censor yourself from reading Einstein or the Israeli media... THANKS.... 11 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I didn't know LBJ was Jewish?!? You didn't know Gaddafi "Osama" Al Baghdadi were Jewish either.... The CHOSEN have long cherished the ability to manipulate others into doing what the CHOSEN want. In the US, we have some pretty obvious frauds too. Rupert Murdoch claims he is a "Catholic," ditto for Rep Peter King. Lindsay Graham is a left wing homosexual Jew disguised as a "Christian conservative." Since the CHOSEN know their own religion is a complete fraud, they use/develop others to do what they want. The want "terror" to be "Islamic" so they get Col Ossman and Simon Elliot to be "leaders" who advocate/lie about "terror." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 4 minutes ago, LaDexter said: What is truly funny is that EVERYTHING I have posted here is true, and that is why you treasonous Zionist bigots only resort to name calling and calls for censorship... Einstein's warning Israeli media documenting Gaddafi was JEWISH - what does that mean about Benghazi?? - who was pissed Gaddafi was overthrown??? A: ISRAEL photos of Col Ossman CIA dossier of 67 war Perhaps a list of things we can't read or look at... you are not anti-semitic if you self censor yourself from reading Einstein or the Israeli media... THANKS.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 21 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: I'd be shocked if I was wrong. apparently nobody else would be... I'll give you another clue.... WHY does one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, have 9 times the ice of the Arctic??? Start the Jeopardy! music.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 minute ago, LaDexter said: apparently nobody else would be... I'll give you another clue.... WHY does one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, have 9 times the ice of the Arctic??? Start the Jeopardy! music.... Because the artic ocean is small and shallow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 Just now, Tiberius said: Because the artic ocean is small and shallow meaning.... the "Antarctic Ocean" is big and deep???? Wait.... THERE IS NO ANTARCTIC OCEAN.... Clue #2 90% of Earth ice on LAND MASS ANTARCTICA 7% of Earth ice on LAND MASS GREENLAND = 97% of Earth ice is on the two land masses closest to an Earth pole... and land moves.... Gosh, if you can't figure it out now, you are dumber than "GEORGE...." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 Who bet five bucks this thread would turn into a FE thread? Please collect your winnings at the booth. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 20 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Who bet five bucks this thread would turn into a FE thread? Please collect your winnings at the booth. This is gold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 Global (non) Warming and the "War on (exclusively anti-Israel) 'terror'" are the two greatest frauds of our time. You either have a clue or you don't.... So, have you all learned that the amount of ice on Earth depends on how much land is near the poles?? The Antarctic Circle is on average 50F colder than the Arctic, and calves/puts 9 times the ice into the oceans, some 46 times the molecular H2O dumped in the Gulf by the Mississippi River. Think of Earth as a room with two air conditioning units, Arctic and Antarctic, each with setting 0 = off and 10 = "MaxCool" Today, the Arctic AC is set at 1 and the Antarctic AC is set at 9.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, LaDexter said: Global (non) Warming and the "War on (exclusively anti-Israel) 'terror'" are the two greatest frauds of our time. You either have a clue or you don't.... So, have you all learned that the amount of ice on Earth depends on how much land is near the poles?? The Antarctic Circle is on average 50F colder than the Arctic, and calves/puts 9 times the ice into the oceans, some 46 times the molecular H2O dumped in the Gulf by the Mississippi River. Think of Earth as a room with two air conditioning units, Arctic and Antarctic, each with setting 0 = off and 10 = "MaxCool" Today, the Arctic AC is set at 1 and the Antarctic AC is set at 9.... Thank you for your profound contributions. Can you please explain, for those of us behind the curve on these important issues, the direct connection between Jews and air conditioning? Also, do you think we could solve all of these problems simply by pushing the Jews off the edge of the Earth? Thanks in advance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 Perhaps you can explain why the "Jews" in our "US" media can't notice the truth of the above. Try asking anyone in the "US" media, including FOX, to ASK THAT QUESTION on the news.... They WON'T. Even Fox won't. Even Greg Gutfeld won't. Because the CHOSEN want us to believe that Co2 is what causes climate change. Best proof it doesn't.... One million years ago, North America was covered with ice down to Indiana, while Greenland was entirely green... https://www.livescience.com/7331-ancient-greenland-green.html "The oldest ever recovered DNA samples have been collected from under more than a mile of Greenland ice, and their analysis suggests the island was much warmer during the last Ice Age than previously thought. The DNA is proof that sometime between 450,000 and 800,000 years ago, much of Greenland was especially green and covered in a boreal forest that was home to alder, spruce and pine trees, as well as insects such as butterflies and beetles." So there you have it. During the past million years, Greenland FROZE while North America THAWED, all at the SAME TIME on the SAME PLANET with the SAME ATMOSPHERE with the SAME AMOUNT of Co2 in the atmosphere.... ICE AGES are CONTINENT SPECIFIC Greenland FROZE because it moved towards the pole. North America THAWED because it moved away (and had an eruption at Yellowstone 640k years ago) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 minute ago, LaDexter said: Perhaps you can explain why the "Jews" in our "US" media can't notice the truth of the above. Try asking anyone in the "US" media, including FOX, to ASK THAT QUESTION on the news.... They WON'T. Even Fox won't. Even Greg Gutfeld won't. Because the CHOSEN want us to believe that Co2 is what causes climate change. Best proof it doesn't.... One million years ago, North America was covered with ice down to Indiana, while Greenland was entirely green... https://www.livescience.com/7331-ancient-greenland-green.html "The oldest ever recovered DNA samples have been collected from under more than a mile of Greenland ice, and their analysis suggests the island was much warmer during the last Ice Age than previously thought. The DNA is proof that sometime between 450,000 and 800,000 years ago, much of Greenland was especially green and covered in a boreal forest that was home to alder, spruce and pine trees, as well as insects such as butterflies and beetles." So there you have it. During the past million years, Greenland FROZE while North America THAWED, all at the SAME TIME on the SAME PLANET with the SAME ATMOSPHERE with the SAME AMOUNT of Co2 in the atmosphere.... ICE AGES are CONTINENT SPECIFIC Greenland FROZE because it moved towards the pole. North America THAWED because it moved away (and had an eruption at Yellowstone 640k years ago) I don't know about anyone else, but I'm convinced!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 I just picture every post by LADexter as coming from Kenny Power's unreleased audio book: It adds a lot to the thread... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, westside said: I don't know about anyone else, but I'm convinced! Hard to refute the truth of the data.... unless you fudge the raw data and cook up a taxpayer funded "study" that concludes the exact opposite of what the raw data did... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 The "warmer" explanation is that the Co2 clumped over NA and fled Greenland.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Because the artic ocean is small and shallow Gonna start calling you the Arctic Ocean from now on. 1 hour ago, LaDexter said: What is truly funny is that EVERYTHING I have posted here is true, and that is why you treasonous Zionist bigots only resort to name calling and calls for censorship... Yes, I call you an idiot because I was instructed to by the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 I chose the right day to check in on PPP. The new dance moves I've learned will take me far in life. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 31 minutes ago, LaDexter said: The "warmer" explanation is that the Co2 clumped over NA and fled Greenland.... https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=georgie+boy+song&view=detail&mid=310680B7515B8BDD835E310680B7515B8BDD835E&FORM=VIRE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Gonna start calling you the Arctic Ocean from now on. Be efficient, call me "Arc" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 WTF is going on in here, this place is all kinds of crazy, I think I like it 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Bray Wyatt said: WTF is going on in here, this place is all kinds of crazy, I think I like it 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 CO2 does warm the atmosphere Even the Methodists say so! Ways we can combat climate change – The United Methodist Church www.umc.org/what-we-believe/ways-we-can-combat-climate-change Sep 19, 2017 - These phenomena include global warming and “extreme weather events” (NASA ... The cars we drive are also big producers of carbon dioxide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 How could anyone be against plant food? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: How could anyone be against plant food? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 (edited) 44 minutes ago, Tiberius said: CO2 does warm the atmosphere That's not what the RAW DATA said.... We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps - satellites and balloons - and both showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2.... http://www.nbcnews.com/id/8917093/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/key-claim-against-global-warming-evaporates/#.Wyv07VU3nGI "satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling." More precisely, both were flat lines that went up and down a bit. In 1998, for example, when Slick Willie said it was the "warmest year ever," both the balloons and satellites showed a cooler than normal atmosphere.... So the fudgebakers bilking the taxpayer had a "problem" with that data, despite the fact that both series were highly correlated. In science, if you have two different measures of the same thing, and both measures are highly correlated, you accept the data, for you have no reason to challenge it. But with more than $10 billion per year of taxpayer money at stake, the "warmers" didn't want to admit the truth of the data, so they fudged both series with uncorrelated "corrections..." "Scientists (cough cough( were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data." With $10 billion per year at stake, guess which one they CHOSE.... Edited June 21, 2018 by LaDexter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 20 minutes ago, LaDexter said: That's not what the RAW DATA said.... We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps - satellites and balloons - and both showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2.... http://www.nbcnews.com/id/8917093/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/key-claim-against-global-warming-evaporates/#.Wyv07VU3nGI "satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling." More precisely, both were flat lines that went up and down a bit. In 1998, for example, when Slick Willie said it was the "warmest year ever," both the balloons and satellites showed a cooler than normal atmosphere.... So the fudgebakers bilking the taxpayer had a "problem" with that data, despite the fact that both series were highly correlated. In science, if you have two different measures of the same thing, and both measures are highly correlated, you accept the data, for you have no reason to challenge it. But with more than $10 billion per year of taxpayer money at stake, the "warmers" didn't want to admit the truth of the data, so they fudged both series with uncorrelated "corrections..." "Scientists (cough cough( were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data." With $10 billion per year at stake, guess which one they CHOSE.... Soooooo what are you trying to say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 On 6/20/2018 at 3:06 PM, LaDexter said: There are two theories as to the "origin" of Osama Bin Laden. The first is the "official" 911 line, that Bin Laden was a SAUDI CLERIC who moved to Afghan in 1994 and started terror group "al Qaeda." The official line is that Bin Laden never wore any military uniform. The second is the 911 Truther line, that Osama is really someone named Col Tom or Tim Os(s)man, a "CIA Asset." These photos clearly prove the latter.... https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/osama-bin-laden-tim-osman-cia-ajiesh-tk http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/binladen_cia.html http://www.jar2.com/2/Iraq/Osama_Bin_Laden.html https://hoaxeye.com/2017/05/28/zbigniew-brzezinski-with-osama-bin-laden/ The other man is simply a member of Pakistani Army. More details about this and similar photos on 911Myths. How about the Tim Osman/Bin Laden conspiracy theory? Again: there is no evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaDexter Posted June 21, 2018 Author Share Posted June 21, 2018 5 minutes ago, bdutton said: The other man is simply a member of Pakistani Army. That's the Zionist spin, that the "member of Pakistani Army" is 100% fluent in English, a long time friend and associate of Ziggy, and gets one on ones with the US NSA without any other security present. The two even shoot rifles together. Just how STUPID do you have to be to buy that one....???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, bdutton said: https://hoaxeye.com/2017/05/28/zbigniew-brzezinski-with-osama-bin-laden/ The other man is simply a member of Pakistani Army. More details about this and similar photos on 911Myths. How about the Tim Osman/Bin Laden conspiracy theory? Again: there is no evidence. Why are you bothering? Dancing Hassidim are much more effective. Can't forget our Ethiopian cousins 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, LaDexter said: That's the Zionist spin, that the "member of Pakistani Army" is 100% fluent in English, a long time friend and associate of Ziggy, and gets one on ones with the US NSA without any other security present. The two even shoot rifles together. Just how STUPID do you have to be to buy that one....???? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 41 minutes ago, LaDexter said: That's not what the RAW DATA said.... We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps - satellites and balloons - and both showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2.... And 400 years of ground-based thermometer readings, and oxygen isotope ratios... 11 minutes ago, LaDexter said: That's the Zionist spin, that the "member of Pakistani Army" is 100% fluent in English Because nobody in the previously British colony of India ever learned fluent English. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: And 400 years of ground-based thermometer readings, and oxygen isotope ratios... Is that the technical term for cow farts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts