Jump to content

Summit Predictions


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

I have no problem with Trump meeting with Kim because Trump is not weak and is competent in negotiating deals. I see no hypocrisy in that.

 

to be seen no? Has Trump negotiated anything yet? And a deal to secure financing on a property or structure a bankruptcy is not the same as negotiating a trade agreement or any other kind of agreement on a national level. This agreement so far is a starting point, we have been there before with this country..now let's see him follow on with open verifications, including military sights..an agreement that does not end after ten years etc..in other words includes all the things he said were not included in the Iran deal. 

 

We sure as hell ain't there yet

Edited by plenzmd1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

to be seen no? Has Trump negotiated anything yet? And a deal to secure financing on a property or structure a bankruptcy is not the same as negotiating a trade agreement or any other kind of agreement on a national level. This agreement so far is a starting point, we have been there before with this country..now let's see him follow on with open verifications, including military sights..an agreement that does not end after ten years etc..in other words includes all the things he said were not included in the Iran deal. 

 

We sure as hell ain't there yet

 

it was much better with BO holding his rear and begging for mercy and apologizing and sending pallets of millions of US dollars

 

p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, plenzmd1 said:

to be seen no? Has Trump negotiated anything yet? And a deal to secure financing on a property or structure a bankruptcy is not the same as negotiating a trade agreement or any other kind of agreement on a national level. This agreement so far is a starting point, we have been there before with this country..now let's see him follow on with open verifications, including military sights..an agreement that does not end after ten years etc..in other words includes all the things he said were not included in the Iran deal. 

 

We sure as hell ain't there yet

 

You're not wrong in principle. However, and it's just MO, don't mistake public progress for total progress. This deal is much farther along than it appears. :beer:

 

 

 

 

 

:lol: 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, row_33 said:

 

it was much better with BO holding his rear and begging for mercy and apologizing and sending pallets of millions of US dollars

 

p

why does everything revert to how/what Barack Obama did? We are talking about Trump no? Is that really hard for you all to understand? Is the goal to gain peace with North Korea or prove BO to be a bad president. Yall accuse the other side of only wanted to batter Trump, all you want to do is bash BO. Have some chops and and answer with some real facts , not just hate mongering on a past president

 

Tell me one international deal Trump has negotiated on behalf of the USA and why it has benefitted the US? And pulling out of TPP and the Paris accords is not negotiating a deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

to be seen no? Has Trump negotiated anything yet? And a deal to secure financing on a property or structure a bankruptcy is not the same as negotiating a trade agreement or any other kind of agreement on a national level. This agreement so far is a starting point, we have been there before with this country..not let's see him follow on with open verifications, including military sights..an agreement that does not end after ten years etc..in other words includes all the things he said were not included in the Iran deal. 

 

We sure as hell ain't there yet

Ha! Besides knowing how to negotiate, Trump has the one card that Obama never had, but is necessary in any successful negotiation. He is willing to walk away if he doesn't get his deal. Obama got a lousy deal in Iran because he wasn't willing to walk away. He had to have that deal for his "legacy". Trump will either get his deal or he'll walk away and impose even more sanctions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rodman must be pissing off the left.  His relationship with Kim essentially takes the race card off the table for libs to use as a reason Obama made no progress on NK. 

 

 

8 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

why does everything revert to how/what Barack Obama did? We are talking about Trump no? Is that really hard for you all to understand? Is the goal to gain peace with North Korea or prove BO to be a bad president. Yall accuse the other side of only wanted to batter Trump, all you want to do is bash BO. Have some chops and and answer with some real facts , not just hate mongering on a past president

 

Tell me one international deal Trump has negotiated on behalf of the USA and why it has benefitted the US? And pulling out of TPP and the Paris accords is not negotiating a deal

 

You're going to see concessions with trading partners on tariffs before he's done. 

Edited by keepthefaith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Ha! Besides knowing how to negotiate, Trump has the one card that Obama never had, but is necessary in any successful negotiation. He is willing to walk away if he doesn't get his deal. Obama got a lousy deal in Iran because he wasn't willing to walk away. He had to have that deal for his "legacy". Trump will either get his deal or he'll walk away and impose even more sanctions.

and that would be great if he is able to get that deal...it sure as hell is not what we have now..right now we have a "yep, thats our plan" from North Korea...which they have said in 3 different agreements since 1992. If there is some promise, timeframe, verification plan I am missing, please point them out to me so i am better informed.

 

And i am hoping and praying he gets it...and for Gods sake tell me what this has to do with Barack Obama? Is that all you care about..or do you care about peace moving forward? Would you like Trump to make a bad deal if it made Obama look bad? Same thing you accuse the other side of doing.

 

Again, negotiating a trade deal/ international treaty is now where near the same as negotiating a refinancing on a property or using a likeness on a doll. I am not saying he cant't/won't negotiate a good deal, but in 500 days we have exactly ZERO evidence that says he will be good at it...he has negotiated ZERO deals.

 

If i am missing it..tell me what deal is out there and why it was good for the USA...thats all I ask. 

Edited by plenzmd1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

why does everything revert to how/what Barack Obama did? We are talking about Trump no? Is that really hard for you all to understand? Is the goal to gain peace with North Korea or prove BO to be a bad president. Yall accuse the other side of only wanted to batter Trump, all you want to do is bash BO. Have some chops and and answer with some real facts , not just hate mongering on a past president

 

Tell me one international deal Trump has negotiated on behalf of the USA and why it has benefitted the US? And pulling out of TPP and the Paris accords is not negotiating a deal

I was accused of hypocrisy and I explained why it wasn't hypocrisy. I used the personal differences between Obama and Trump to prove it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

Tell me one international deal Trump has negotiated on behalf of the USA and why it has benefitted the US? 

 

He literally just signed a pledge to completely denuclearize the Korean Peninsula and to end the Korean War - prior to getting three hostages back (for nothing). 

 

The benefits are evident. The world today is safer than the world was yesterday just by nature of the meeting. Don't forget, it was just a few weeks ago that people were standing on their chairs screaming we were headed to nuclear war with the DPRK.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 3rdnlng said:

I was accused of hypocrisy and I explained why it wasn't hypocrisy. I used the personal differences between Obama and Trump to prove it.

huh??? Wow, maybe I am missing something. So you say Obama is weak, Trump is strong...therefore Trump makes a great deal ...and yet cannot point to one deal Trump has done on the international stage....and that is somehow proof of exacrtly what????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

If i am missing it..tell me what deal is out there and why it was good for the USA...thats all I ask. 

 

You're asking this while ignoring completely what happened yesterday. What happened yesterday has never happened before. No US leader has ever had one on one talks, directly with the DPRK. No DPRK leader has ever signed a joint deal like this before. It's completely uncharted and historic water. 

 

Yes, it's not a finish line (publicly), but it's also not nothing. It's an international deal, brought together by working with numerous allies and adversaries (China, Russia, Japan, South Korea, et al). It took finesse, talent, and negotiating to get all those parties to agree to support this deal in the first place - let alone what it took to get Kim to the table. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You're asking this while ignoring completely what happened yesterday. What happened yesterday has never happened before. No US leader has ever had one on one talks, directly with the DPRK. No DPRK leader has ever signed a joint deal like this before. It's completely uncharted and historic water. 

 

Yes, it's not a finish line (publicly), but it's also not nothing. It's an international deal, brought together by working with numerous allies and adversaries (China, Russia, Japan, South Korea, et al). It took finesse, talent, and negotiating to get all those parties to agree to support this deal in the first place - let alone what it took to get Kim to the table. 

 

Not to quibble, but how is this different at this point than the deals his father agreed to with Clinton & Bush?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He literally just signed a pledge to completely denuclearize the Korean Peninsula and to end the Korean War - prior to getting three hostages back (for nothing). 

 

The benefits are evident. The world today is safer than the world was yesterday just by nature of the meeting. Don't forget, it was just a few weeks ago that people were standing on their chairs screaming we were headed to nuclear war with the DPRK.  

asI have mentioned, I think it a great first step. And has mentioned, they have pledged to denuclearize 3 times before..never following through on the agreement. I too think this time may be different..and I am hoping it is. But what was signed today was no different than what was signed in 92, or 2005.

 

I agree the world is safer based on these meetings..and I am THRILLED about that. But I think most need to some teeth moving forward..get the deal with NK he says he should have had with Iran...then I will sing to the mountaintops what a great deal/negotiator Trump is..but I ain't doing it off a pledge. And IF BO had come back with this same agreement and swore we were entering a new age cause Kim pledged he would give up his nukes, but there was no verification attached, no timetable attached, no concrete plans other than " I trust him"...truly what do you think your response would have been?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

and that would be great if he is able to get that deal...it sure as hell is not what we have now..right now we have a "yep, thats our plan" from North Korea...which they have said in 3 different agreements since 1992. If there is some promise, timeframe, verification plan I am missing, please point them out to me so i am better informed.

 

And i am hoping and praying he gets it...and for Gods sake tell me what this has to do with Barack Obama? Is that all you care about..or do you care about peace moving forward? Would you like Trump to make a bad deal if it made Obama look bad? Same thing you accuse the other side of doing.

 

Again, negotiating a trade deal/ international treaty is now where near the same as negotiating a refinancing on a property or using a likeness on a doll. I am not saying he cant't/won't negotiate a good deal, but in 500 days we have exactly ZERO evidence that says he will be good at it...he has negotiated ZERO deals.

I've spent decades negotiating deals. While none of them have been international peace or trade deals the basics of negotiating are the same. People laughed at Trump for saying it was about attitude. Let me tell you, it is about attitude. It's also about positioning and preparation. We don't know what has transpired or what will transpire but I do know that Trump will not accept a bad deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

Not to quibble, but how is this different at this point than the deals his father agreed to with Clinton & Bush?

 

The main difference is how the deal was done - one on one talks for months between Trump and Kim - and the fact this deal is farther along than what we see today - but I'll leave that aside because it's not verifiable in open source. 

 

I'll say the differences are: what was given up and was offered in exchange for the pledge (POWs return is new, as is a pledge to end the Korean War), the sanctions levels leading to the deal are more powerful than either of those administrations, plus the participation of China and Russia in a meaningful way means the deal has more teeth than either of the others, and finally who was in the room. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...