Doc Brown Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 5 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said: Hopefully the players can run all the schemes. Maybe this is why they retooled the line as our guys really preferred the power blocking. That.......or one lineman retired due to medical concerns and another retired, unretired, and then threw a dumbbell at a government spy who was in his playground. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 Music to my freaking ears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cage Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 16 hours ago, Mrbojanglezs said: in theory this is good...we'll see how good they can implement and execute it week to week. reminds me of Rex's defense. Sometimes more is not better. Thats a good analogy... hopefully doesn't come to fruition. The other one that it reminds me of is Hackett wanting to run a very fast, no huddle w/ EJ at QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 17 hours ago, Mrbojanglezs said: reminds me of Rex's defense. Sometimes more is not better. You compensate for that mind numbing immensity of the Ryan Brothers defensive genius by just putting 10 players on the field. To not do so would just be too unfair to the opponents. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 4 hours ago, YoloinOhio said: I think it can be some of both but this is how Pats strategize offensively, especially in the run game and personnel groupings. Wouldn't it be nice to have a team or unit that other teams have to scheme against rather then the Bills having to scheme against what they do all the time? By saying they will be flexible and scheme week to week according to the opponent is almost saying they are just going to go out and try not to lose and let them dictate how the game is played Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted June 1, 2018 Author Share Posted June 1, 2018 (edited) 37 minutes ago, apuszczalowski said: Wouldn't it be nice to have a team or unit that other teams have to scheme against rather then the Bills having to scheme against what they do all the time? By saying they will be flexible and scheme week to week according to the opponent is almost saying they are just going to go out and try not to lose and let them dictate how the game is played It’s not almost saying that at all. It’s called complex game planning. Some teams do more intricate scheming toward matchups than others. Pats are famous for it. Edited June 1, 2018 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haslett_Stomp Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 46 minutes ago, apuszczalowski said: Wouldn't it be nice to have a team or unit that other teams have to scheme against rather then the Bills having to scheme against what they do all the time? By saying they will be flexible and scheme week to week according to the opponent is almost saying they are just going to go out and try not to lose and let them dictate how the game is played AKA the K-Gun offense. If only they had kept handing off to Thurman in XXV... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said: It’s not almost saying that at all. It’s called complex game planning. Some teams do more intricate scheming toward matchups than others. Pats are famous for it. The Pat's do it cause they can, because teams have to game plan for them. You can plan or tweak your schemes occasionally if you know the team your playing has weaknesses in areas, but an offence should be dictating the play, not being reactive to the defences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swnybillsfan Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 15 hours ago, Cripple Creek said: Nope. Wade Phillips "they took the sails out of our wind." no way, wasn't that Mike Mularky? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 16 hours ago, Inigo Montoya said: Fair enough... But what if the Bills had hired Belichick eighteen years ago instead of Gregg Williams, and the Bills had won multiple Super Bowls over the ensuing years and been the most dominant team in the league for more than a decade, do you really think you'd feel the same way about our coach Belichick? If he had been cheating repeatedly I'd think Ralph would have the ethical backbone to fire him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted June 1, 2018 Author Share Posted June 1, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, apuszczalowski said: The Pat's do it cause they can, because teams have to game plan for them. You can plan or tweak your schemes occasionally if you know the team your playing has weaknesses in areas, but an offence should be dictating the play, not being reactive to the defences. Not sure you understand what he’s saying. He is game planning. They can dictate play in the game, by the way they approach the matchups each week.http://m.buffalobills.com/news/article-1/Why-Brian-Dabolls-approach-is-making-a-difference-in-Buffalo/112eb1ad-e809-4c21-b69a-709194ea9fd5 Quote Additionally, Daboll sees value in changing the speed at which the offense operates, something New England's offense has done for years. "You have to dictate tempo offensively," he said. "But there's also a part of scheming and seeing what the defense gives you and trying to attack those weaknesses." That's the part of Daboll's approach to offense that excites Clay the most. NFL offensive coordinators know it's a matchup league and often look for those mismatches each week. Clay however, sees Daboll as a play caller who makes it his top priority. "He definitely does a good job of coaching the quarterbacks to find the mismatch," said Clay. "He coaches reads too, but he thinks mismatches first. The quarterbacks are going to give us chances. That's the exciting thing. (Daboll) thinks matchups first and that's something that will help us this year." Edited June 1, 2018 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swnybillsfan Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 10 hours ago, NewDayBills said: I prefer that you do your thing and not so much worry what other people are doing. I'd rather we have our own identity than to have an identity based off of what some other team is doing. you make a good point, but i think their could be a balance in there. "this is what we want to do, and this is how we are going to accomplish it". i think there is something to be said for a nice blend of both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted June 1, 2018 Author Share Posted June 1, 2018 Tbh I know he wants to be multiple on offense as that has been brought up before by McDermott, but the poster who said he also is purposely not broadcasting his main scheme is probably spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cripple Creek Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 25 minutes ago, swnybillsfan said: no way, wasn't that Mike Mularky? I thought it was a Wadeism, definitely could be wrong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 30 minutes ago, swnybillsfan said: no way, wasn't that Mike Mularky? Jesus, Mary and Joseph...Hank Bullough. Unless 'No Headphones Phillips' or Mularky repeated.it later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cripple Creek Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 4 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said: Jesus, Mary and Joseph...Hank Bullough. Unless 'No Headphones Phillips' or Mularky repeated.it later. You are correct, I am humbled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 Daboll, no doubt, has experience utilizing different techniques to block others from getting by him at a fast food counter or buffet line. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 3 minutes ago, Cripple Creek said: You are correct, I am humbled. Don't be humbled, just say you're young. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cripple Creek Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 5 minutes ago, Ridgewaycynic2013 said: Don't be humbled, just say you're young. Likely older n you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Cripple Creek said: Likely older n you. Remember the Lamonica trade? I remember crying and feeling sorry when the nice man in need of a shave said on live tv "you won't have Dick Nixon to kick around any more." Edited June 1, 2018 by Ridgewaycynic2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts