Jump to content

Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, row_33 said:

so there is no difference between

 

a)  a consensual sexual encounter, be it with wife, girlfriend, mistress, hooker

 

and

 

b)  a pig using his position of power to force a woman to have to watch him play with his wingwang or perform a sexual act that she has stated she does not want to

 

good brains there liberals...

 

What do you expect from these people?

 

Like I have said many times before............. I have liberals in my immediate family that think like the loons we argue with. VERY DANGEROUS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LABillzFan said:

 

That has the be the dumbest piece of trash I've ever read. And I just spent a part of a week reading LA Grant's posts.

 

 

I thought the original #metoo was when the Stay Puft marshmallow man raped Zuul?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

What do you expect from these people?

 

Like I have said many times before............. I have liberals in my immediate family that think like the loons we argue with. VERY DANGEROUS.

 

 

do they think it's funny if they order a pizza and it arrives 2 hours later and cold and with 1/2 of what they ordered?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

 

do they think it's funny if they order a pizza and it arrives 2 hours later and cold and with 1/2 of what they ordered?

 

 

 

They will just blame Trump. Literally blame Trump.

 

I wish I was kidding about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, row_33 said:

so there is no difference between

 

a)  a consensual sexual encounter, be it with wife, girlfriend, mistress, hooker

 

and

 

b)  a pig using his position of power to force a woman to have to watch him play with his wingwang or perform a sexual act that she has stated she does not want to

 

good brains there liberals...

 

Of course.  Because consent is reactive, so when a woman consents it can only be in response to a man's initiative.  Ergo, by giving consent a woman is being exploited by toxic masculinity, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Trump messed around with a porn star...............

 

isn't it a Trump-Melania and not a Trump getting impeached problem?

 

Even if Trump messed with a XXX star, who cares. If Obozo did the same thing, I wouldn't care either. So, this isn't a right-left thing to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, njbuff said:

If Trump messed around with a porn star...............

 

isn't it a Trump-Melania and not a Trump getting impeached problem?

 

Even if Trump messed with a XXX star, who cares. If Obozo did the same thing, I wouldn't care either. So, this isn't a right-left thing to me.

 

Even Bill Clinton messing around with an intern was just a Bill-Hillary problem, until he lied about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Even Bill Clinton messing around with an intern was just a Bill-Hillary problem, until he lied about it.

 

Billy boy lie???? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

Quite shocking really. Yet Trump is the pathological liar. Makes sense doesn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Even Bill Clinton messing around with an intern was just a Bill-Hillary problem, until he lied about it.

 

no, he violated the civil rights of a woman before he was President, and then lied about it under grand jury oath while Presdient

 

Lewinsky was a shattering of his credibility, it wasn't the reason for impeachment....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

A lawyer for Stormy Daniels hinted to NBC’s Todayshow Wednesday morning that the adult-film actress possibly possessed evidence that a “sexual relationship” between herself and President Trump occurred—and would be willing to return the $130,000 paid to her to nullify a nondisclosure agreement signed days before the 2016 election. When asked by host Savannah Guthrie if Daniels (the stage name for Stephanie Clifford) still had “photos, images, and text messages that verify [her] claim,” lawyer Michael Avenatti responded, “That’s a question that Ms. Daniels will have to ultimately answer... I do know the answer and I’m not at liberty to disclose that this morning.” He added, “We think it’s highly questionable” that the $130,000 paid to Daniels came from Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen’s personal fund. He said “there’s no question” that Trump knew about the payment “at the time,” and “there’s many additional facts and evidence that we have, and we think that’s gonna come to light.” Avenatti said he believed Trump failed to sign the agreement so that he could “claim deniability,” and Daniels “may ultimately return the money... and she’s prepared to do that.” Daniels filed a lawsuit on Tuesday in Los Angeles Superior Court seeking to free her from the “hush agreement.” 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/stormy-daniels-lawyer-more-evidence-is-going-to-come-to-light

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, row_33 said:

 

no, he violated the civil rights of a woman before he was President, and then lied about it under grand jury oath while Presdient

 

Lewinsky was a shattering of his credibility, it wasn't the reason for impeachment....

 

 

 

You can't impeach on the basis of a general "liar, liar, pants on fire" finding.  You need an actual, demonstrable, explicit crime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

You can't impeach on the basis of a general "liar, liar, pants on fire" finding.  You need an actual, demonstrable, explicit crime.

 

Bill committed perjury under oath before a grand jury. That’s a crime and he was impeached for it.

 

being convicted by the Senate requires more than that and he wasn’t 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

A lawyer for Stormy Daniels hinted to NBC’s Todayshow Wednesday morning that the adult-film actress possibly possessed evidence that a “sexual relationship” between herself and President Trump occurred—and would be willing to return the $130,000 paid to her to nullify a nondisclosure agreement signed days before the 2016 election. When asked by host Savannah Guthrie if Daniels (the stage name for Stephanie Clifford) still had “photos, images, and text messages that verify [her] claim,” lawyer Michael Avenatti responded, “That’s a question that Ms. Daniels will have to ultimately answer... I do know the answer and I’m not at liberty to disclose that this morning.” He added, “We think it’s highly questionable” that the $130,000 paid to Daniels came from Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen’s personal fund. He said “there’s no question” that Trump knew about the payment “at the time,” and “there’s many additional facts and evidence that we have, and we think that’s gonna come to light.” Avenatti said he believed Trump failed to sign the agreement so that he could “claim deniability,” and Daniels “may ultimately return the money... and she’s prepared to do that.” Daniels filed a lawsuit on Tuesday in Los Angeles Superior Court seeking to free her from the “hush agreement.” 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/stormy-daniels-lawyer-more-evidence-is-going-to-come-to-light

 

Translation:  $130K is a pittance.  This thing with free media support is worth million$. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

Bill committed perjury under oath before a grand jury. That’s a crime and he was impeached for it.

 

being convicted by the Senate requires more than that and he wasn’t 

 

 

 

Yes.  For a SPECIFIC lie.  Not for a general perception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, njbuff said:

 

The liberal crowd loves to cling to the "Trump is a pathological liar" rhetoric.

 

Yeah, and Trump is so scared of Mueller that he said ON RECORD that he has no problem being questioned by Mueller.

 

But, continue on with your liberal talking points that ring on deaf ears.

He is a pathological liar.  There's countless statements and tweets to back that up.  It's that characteristic that led to Mueller even being hired when he gave differing accounts of the reason for firing Comey.  It's pry why his lawyers want him nowhere near Mueller.  Not that he's guilty of anything related to Russia, but Mueller could easily coax him into lying about something completely unrelated.

Edited by Doc Brown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...