Jump to content

Nate Peterman's performance against the Chargers


SDS

Which QB starts in Week 11?  

144 members have voted

  1. 1. Which QB starts in Week 11?

    • Nate Peterman
      43
    • Tyrod Taylor
      101


Recommended Posts

Just now, Buffalo Boy said:

I don’t think it was Dennison’s decision to trade Sammy or gut the roster.  This receiving Corp is capable of playing a short game.

Is asking your QB to throw with timing, Place balls in the field of play and anticipate routes too much for any OC to ask?

 

That is a good point. I hate Dennisons lack of feel for when to call play action etc, but he did have an interesting  quote in PS before the SW trade. He said he believes in the Shanahan system and thinks you need 4-5 big p,aye in the passing game to win, so you need to try 8. Hard to do with no deep threat 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

Give it up GG........the Bills roster was decimated by the new regime this past offseason........it's not a good place to start a rookie pocket passer now.

 

Deshaun Watson in an offense catered to his skills?   Maybe......but that's not what they wanted.

 

But there is never a better time to DRAFT one than the present.  

 

 

 

 

 

Don't you think that's part of the Process?

 

They had a free option on 2017 and it almost worked out for them.  It's also clear why Rico was their 3rd option for OC.  Who knows maybe McCoy is available again after this season.

 

I'd be a lot more upset if this roster is this poor next season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Shouldn't have traded Watkins... the offense could work with Taylor if Watkins was here. Of course, Dennsion might have screwed that up too 

 

Yep.  One of a handful of players they simply couldn't afford to lose after the offseason they had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Boy said:

I don’t think it was Dennison’s decision to trade Sammy or gut the roster.  This receiving Corp is capable of playing a short game.

Is asking your QB to throw with timing, Place balls in the field of play and anticipate routes too much for any OC to ask?

 

Given that Dennison ruined Peyton Manning the answer might be yes when it comes to his offense.  Dennison hasn't done anything worth writing home about since 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Boy said:

I don’t think it was Dennison’s decision to trade Sammy or gut the roster.  This receiving Corp is capable of playing a short game.

Is asking your QB to throw with timing, Place balls in the field of play and anticipate routes too much for any OC to ask?

 

With this Oline, I'm surprised TT has played as well as he has overall this season. You should appreciate the guy a bit more than the constant degrading. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Buffalo Boy said:

Jones was never going to be a deep threat.

 

Exactly my point.

 

Nice player but wasn't congruent with a system that would accentuate the skills of the starting QB.

 

There is a reason that the Steelers hang on to all of their downfield WR's like they are gold even though they can't possibly use them all.........they know that Big Ben is not very good without a field stretcher and that being able to get deep also opens up the run game.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JM2009 said:

With this Oline, I'm surprised TT has played as well as he has overall this season. You should appreciate the guy a bit more than the constant degrading. 

Even when tyrod has time he does nothing. The line is bad, but it was proven today the line is the biggest problem. But both our QBs are career backups. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JM2009 said:

With this Oline, I'm surprised TT has played as well as he has overall this season. You should appreciate the guy a bit more than the constant degrading. 

I don’t believe, and haven’t since the end of 2015, that he is capable of leading a team to a Championship. Unless you give him the 85 Bears D or the Dilfer LED Ravens D.

I don’t see us getting that kind of once in a generation D here so I’m threw with him because it is SB as the only goal.

I don’t want to limp into the playoffs as a 6 seed and get embarrassed just to end the “ drought”. 

He’s a good guy. Maybe on the right team he works. He doesn’t work for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CircleTheWagons99 said:

Even when tyrod has time he does nothing. The line is bad, but it was proven today the line is the biggest problem. But both our QBs are career backups. 

Then TT is the best backup in the league and Peterman one of the worst nackups at this stage. not his fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People keep saying things like "both QB's were bad today" and "Tyrod was so bad in the Jets game".  Let's get one thing straight.  He was bad in the N0 game.  Not throw 5 picks in the first half bad.  He checked it down when Dennison wanted him to throw into double and triple coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo Boy said:

I don’t believe, and haven’t since the end of 2015, that he is capable of leading a team to a Championship. Unless you give him the 85 Bears D or the Dilfer LED Ravens D.

I don’t see us getting that kind of once in a generation D here so I’m threw with him because it is SB as the only goal.

I don’t want to limp into the playoffs as a 6 seed and get embarrassed just to end the “ drought”. 

He’s a good guy. Maybe on the right team he works. He doesn’t work for me.

You better open your eyes and realize this organization will probably never be in a championship again. A weak playoff spot is a SB right now from where we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Maine-iac said:

I"ve heard that and duly noted ...... but the guy sucks.  He was awful in Denver and he's awful here.  It's one of those cases where you can't even really evaluate the "talent" because he's so bad at creating anything with the plays.

I certainly have no love for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, 2 INTs go on Nate's record today, and no more.

 

The first should have been a completion; 2 others were lame duck passes as Peterman threw when he was hit.  I'm willing to ignore those.

 

The 2 others were the real interceptions; he had time, he looked; he threw, he made bad decisions and/or bad passes.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fadingpain said:

In my opinion, 2 INTs go on Nate's record today, and no more.

 

The first should have been a completion; 2 others were lame duck passes as Peterman threw when he was hit.  I'm willing to ignore those.

 

The 2 others were the real interceptions; he had time, he looked; he threw, he made bad decisions and/or bad passes.

 

 

Great we'll tell the stat guys to adjust accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...