BADOLBILZ Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, GG said: Well look who jumped off the "draft a QB with the first pick" bandwagon. Didn't think it would be Tyrod who got you off the habit. Yeah right, I will never get off that bandwagon. But unlike yourself....... I know somebody has to play QB in the meantime. That has always been my opinion wrt Tyrod. Just so happens he's been a productive option. The Steelers didn't become good when they got Ben Roethlisberger.......they won some O'Donnell then with Tomczak and Stewart and then Tommy Maddox........totally forgettable QB's who got them to many championship games and one Super Bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM2009 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Bangarang said: Unlike you I really don’t care what other people think. If they think Tyrod sucks then fine whatever. I won’t change their minds about it. If they thought Peterman was the better option then whatever too. I’ve always said that Peterman likely isn’t the answer and he will probably suck. I don’t get mad at what other people say and I’m certainly not going to waste too much time arguing about it like you do. You want to take a shot at me by saying I should be irritated since I claim to be unbiased then fine. You go ahead and instigate because it’s what you do. You love to argue on here and you can’t stand it when someone doesn’t see things the way you do. Carry on with your petty arguments and calling people biased and dishonest. It’s very clear that being right and calling people out means the world to you. Forgive while I just carry on living my life and not get irritated over the nonsense of people thinking a player on a team I love is bad. And you are still doing it. I didn't instigate anything. They posted me stating i was happy for the loss. The same ones that disappeared after wins and were in here bashing TT right after losses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, Bangarang said: Unlike you I really don’t care what other people think. If they think Tyrod sucks then fine whatever. I won’t and can’t hange their minds about it. If they thought Peterman was the better option then whatever too. I’ve always said that Peterman likely isn’t the answer and he will probably suck. I don’t get mad at what other people say and I’m certainly not going to waste too much time arguing about it like you do. If that’s what you want to do then I guess have at it. You want to take a shot at me by saying I should be irritated since I claim to be unbiased then fine. You go ahead and instigate because it’s what you do. You love to argue on here and you can’t stand it when someone doesn’t see things the way you do. Carry on with your petty arguments and calling people biased and dishonest. It’s very clear that being right and calling people out means a lot to you. Forgive me while I just carry on living my life and not get irritated over the nonsense of people thinking a player on a team I love is bad. Agenda! Biased! Crusade of not agreeing with all of my opinions! 3 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said: Yeah right, I will never get off that bandwagon. But unlike yourself....... I know somebody has to play QB in the meantime. That has always been my opinion wrt Tyrod. Just so happens he's been a productive option. The Steelers didn't become good when they got Ben Roethlisberger.......they won some O'Donnell then with Tomczak and Stewart and then Tommy Maddox........totally forgettable QB's who got them to many championship games and one Super Bowl. Someone can play next year. Our precious pocket passing QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 24 minutes ago, Marty McFly said: Get over it boatcolada. Ya got beet. Ya hoped on the petermen train and you crashed into a dumpster fire. We couldve won today. We beat better teams this year than the chargers. Hay Marty, I never called for NP to start and was stunned by the decision . But I was on board with it. Taylor isn't good enough and I thought there was practically no chance the Bills could beat the Chargers with TT at the helm. So I give McD credit for trying something. Why let the season sink with Tyrod then switch afterward when it couldn't do any good? It had little chance of working long or short term but they had to do something. Maybe Taylor gets a fire lit under his a$$ and starts to throw the ball and score some points cause this defense is BAD. If Taylor started and lost today, you're not putting the rook in at Arrowhead. You do it in the 30000 seat soccer stadium. If TT is as good as you think, he'll get woken up and actually be a QB like teams have said they wanted to make him do. He should be able to beat a Chiefs team that's in a free fall right now because he's a seasoned vet. You could not switch to Peterman vs the Chiefs or Patriots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM2009 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, jmc12290 said: Agenda! Biased! Crusade of not agreeing with all of my opinions! Someone can play next year. Our precious pocket passing QB. One of the main agitators who ridiculed anyone who thought TT was a better option than Peterman. Then for deflection, claim I was happy over the loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, Bob in STL said: I get your point. I would have stayed with TT until the inevitable playoff elimination, then played Peterman to get a look see. Seems like a better and more logical approach for all involved. Better for TT, better for Coach, better for NP, and for the whole team. Now we have a disaster ... maybe the team will rally around TT and beat KC in KC next week? I doubt it but weirder things have happened. But it HAD to be this game. The Chargers have zero home field advantage and there's no way you could start a rookie at Arrowhead or vs Tom Brady. So you try to win a football game today and if it doesn't work you can go back to Taylor at Arrowhead vs a struggling Chiefs team. Anothony Lynn was going to follow the blueprint vs Taylor even with his vaunted pass rushers. He would have been crushed today, just in a different way but it was going to be ugly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, JM2009 said: One of the main agitators who ridiculed anyone who thought TT was a better option than Peterman. Then for deflection, claim I was happy over the loss. Libel! Edited November 20, 2017 by jmc12290 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM2009 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: Hay Marty, I never called for NP to start and was stunned by the decision . But I was on board with it. Taylor isn't good enough and I thought there was practically no chance the Bills could beat the Chargers with TT at the helm. So I give McD credit for trying something. Why let the season sink with Tyrod then switch afterward when it couldn't do any good? It had little chance of working long or short term but they had to do something. Maybe Taylor gets a fire lit under his a$$ and starts to throw the ball and score some points cause this defense is BAD. If Taylor started and lost today, you're not putting the rook in at Arrowhead. You do it in the 30000 seat soccer stadium. If TT is as good as you think, he'll get woken up and actually be a QB like teams have said they wanted to make him do. He should be able to beat a Chiefs team that's in a free fall right now because he's a seasoned vet. You could not switch to Peterman vs the Chiefs or Patriots. So playing TT against this same 3-6 team to maybe get a win, would have been a foolish idea? You know, 6-4 would have looked awful good right now. Now at 5-5, it's all on TT going against KC? Season is done. We will be 5-7. probably finish 7-9. Just now, jmc12290 said: Libel! Not when it's the truth. Your cocky posting speaks for itself. You and Maury B used to be a tag team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 McDumbass Decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM2009 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Buffalo BillsVerified account @buffalobills FollowingFollowing @buffalobills More LeSean McCoy: “The QB situation is not my call...It’s tough. Things like this happen in the NFL. We’re not totally out of It. We have to keep fighting.” #BUFvsLAC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Inside source... Take it for what it's worth. Passed to me 3rd hand by someone I trust infinitly Taylors benching was 100% Dennison. This was per Taylor from a conversation bhe had with confidant in messages exchanged today at halftime. I'd you don't believe me that is fine. But I believe my source. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said: Yeah right, I will never get off that bandwagon. But unlike yourself....... I know somebody has to play QB in the meantime. That has always been my opinion wrt Tyrod. Just so happens he's been a productive option. The Steelers didn't become good when they got Ben Roethlisberger.......they won some O'Donnell then with Tomczak and Stewart and then Tommy Maddox........totally forgettable QB's who got them to many championship games and one Super Bowl. Well look who's getting sloppy now. Tell me, how many games did Roethlisberger apprentice under those guys? And the analogy isn't quite valid, because the Steelers are a model franchise of stability, which could get away with mediocre QB play. Why aren't you throwing out the example of the Colts with and without Peyton? Bills are not a model franchise at this moment, and if anything, McDermott is trying to build that foundation that others tried, but never succeeded because they never hit on the QB and ran out of owners' patience. The last guy who tried to do this kind of rebuild was Donahoe, and he'd still be here if he hit on the trade to get Ben. Winning 9 games this year with Tyrod and clinching the last playoff spot is immaterial from a long term perspective, because there would still be a gaping hole at QB. Bills can easily sign a Josh McCown or Brian Hoyer for one season while they wait for the rookie to ease into the league. Hell, Fitz will be available again 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starrymessenger Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 2 hours ago, JM2009 said: lol 20-18 with this average team is far from sucking. Your agenda posts suck, that's about it. Hardly the same "average team". How did your guy look last week with THIS team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Looking at the drive chart is mind boggling... First Half: 6 Plays - INT 3 Plays - INT 2 Plays - TD 5 Plays - INT 1 Play - INT 3 Plays - Punt 3 Plays - Punt 2 Plays - INT Second Half: 8 Plays - FG 8 Plays - Fumble 8 Plays - TD 11 Plays - TD 3 Plays - Punt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) 10 minutes ago, JM2009 said: So playing TT against this same 3-6 team to maybe get a win, would have been a foolish idea? You know, 6-4 would have looked awful good right now. Now at 5-5, it's all on TT going against KC? Season is done. We will be 5-7. probably finish 7-9. I guess that depends how much confidence one had that Taylor would figure out how to beat defenses keeping him in the pocket and begging him to throw the ball. Vs a HC that drew up game plans to minimize he weaknesses and knew exactly how to defend him. I for one had very little confidence that would happen regardless of the Chargers record. They have Rivers and lost close games. The Bills defense hasn't been stopping anyone. The switch to the rook had little chance of working , certainly not long term but maybe to win a game . If you have so much confidence in Taylor , he should have little trouble vs a KC team that hasn't played well in over a month and is ripe to be beaten at home. They lost to a putrid Giants team today. But the switch to Peterman would have zero chance at Arrowhead. It may have worked today and I dint want to see the season sink under Tyrod. If he's good he'll beat a paper tiger Chiefs team that will probably keep him in the pocket. If you think the season is done due to this loss, you must feel that they weren't making the playoffs anyway with Taylor. That's how I felt, so while stunned by the decision I felt it was worth the shot and showed the Coaches don't think they could win with TT at QB. Edited November 20, 2017 by Boatdrinks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: Inside source... Take it for what it's worth. Passed to me 3rd hand by someone I trust infinitly Taylors benching was 100% Dennison. This was per Taylor from a conversation bhe had with confidant in messages exchanged today at halftime. I'd you don't believe me that is fine. But I believe my source. Dennison is the gift that keeps on giving. I sincerely hope this guy is not our OC next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM2009 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, starrymessenger said: Hardly the same "average team". How did your guy look last week with THIS team? He was terrible. But terrible against an 8-2 team that can win the SB. The five wins he played pretty well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: Inside source... Take it for what it's worth. Passed to me 3rd hand by someone I trust infinitly Taylors benching was 100% Dennison. This was per Taylor from a conversation bhe had with confidant in messages exchanged today at halftime. I'd you don't believe me that is fine. But I believe my source. This wouldn't shock me. Dennsion is a weak DC anyway, and McD doesn't seem too hands on with the offense. He probably felt hamstrung by Taylor as he's unconventional. Just now, JM2009 said: He was terrible. But terrible against an 8-2 team that can win the SB. The five wins he played pretty well. He just wasn't going to be defended the way those teams played him anymore. Certainly not by Anthony Lynn and crew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 11 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: Inside source... Take it for what it's worth. Passed to me 3rd hand by someone I trust infinitly Taylors benching was 100% Dennison. This was per Taylor from a conversation bhe had with confidant in messages exchanged today at halftime. I'd you don't believe me that is fine. But I believe my source. I believe it. Total backfire. Id almost rather have Hackett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 6 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: Inside source... Take it for what it's worth. Passed to me 3rd hand by someone I trust infinitly Taylors benching was 100% Dennison. This was per Taylor from a conversation bhe had with confidant in messages exchanged today at halftime. I'd you don't believe me that is fine. But I believe my source. Sounds like the story that was reported last week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts