Jump to content

Lacanfora: Seahawks tried to trade for Glenn


YoloinOhio

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Murph keep saying stay tuned regarding the Bills tackle situation not that he's been a very good predictor of things like that in the past.

 

Yeah, I think he's probably just referring to Henderson being back in the mix. If they're continuing on with this Miller/Ducasse competition, I can't see why they wouldn't challenge Mills with Henderson or Dawkins if Glenn is healthy enough to be back full time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, I think he's probably just referring to Henderson being back in the mix. If they're continuing on with this Miller/Ducasse competition, I can't see why they wouldn't challenge Mills with Henderson or Dawkins if Glenn is healthy enough to be back full time.

 

+1. His "news" is likely just that Henderson has been activated to the active roster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can get a WR and 3rd/4th round pick for Glenn not sure how we don't pull the trigger ASAP.

 

Glenn is average and his better days are behind him. Time to move on and facilitate this rebuild.

We sure didn't pay him like he was average. When healthy I think he is a very good player but he can't stay on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest K-GunJimKelly12

 

Yeah, I think he's probably just referring to Henderson being back in the mix. If they're continuing on with this Miller/Ducasse competition, I can't see why they wouldn't challenge Mills with Henderson or Dawkins if Glenn is healthy enough to be back full time.

How about:

 

Glenn, Incognito, Wood, Dawkins, Henderson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We sure didn't pay him like he was average. When healthy I think he is a very good player but he can't stay on the field.

 

He's like Wood, has a handful of very good to great games per season but is average to terrible in the rest.

 

There is a reason why this new regime isn't committing to him just like with Dareus, they obviously want him gone and I'm totally fine with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Beane and McD may or may not be the answer, but sticking with one of the worst starting QB's this team has ever seen certainly don't inspire confidence.

 

Obviously you haven't been following the Bills much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

He's like Wood, has a handful of very good to great games per season but is average to terrible in the rest.

 

There is a reason why this new regime isn't committing to him just like with Dareus, they obviously want him gone and I'm totally fine with it.

see this is total BS.

Glenn has been very good to excellent during his career here.

Everyone was delighted at the time when they contracted him.

 

This trade/ move Glenn is just proof you folks are wishy washy daily horoscope reading national enquirer subscribers.

 

This board is becoming an embarrassment with all the GMs making Irsay type suggestions.

Go get yourselves cleaned up and come back when your heads are clear.

 

Just because the guy is injured..

 

sheesh

Edited by 3rdand12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

see this is total BS.

Glenn has been very good to excellent during his career here.

Everyone was delighted at the time when they contracted him.

 

This trade mobe Glenn is just proof you folks are wishy washy daily horoscope reading national enquirer subscribers.

 

This board is becoming an embarrassment with all the GMs making Irsay type suggestions.

Go get yourselves cleaned up and come back when your heads are clear.

 

Just because the guy is injured..

 

sheesh

 

teacher2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade him for a WR & i would be happy, get something!

how about we just keep a Franchise left tackle and see it Bills can get him back to full strength?

Or we could go outback to the LT trees.See if any are ripe yet?

 

 

teacher2.gif

I have concerns.

 

about the fan base these days.

 

Maybe it's fantasy football Maybe it's global warming.

But I sure miss guys and girls who always rooted for the Buffalo laundry :wallbash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the REALLY not important Dept.: Guaranty is not wrong - just obsolete.

 

 

http://grammarist.com/usage/guarantee-vs-guaranty/

 

Guaranty is an obsolete form of the word guarantee, it is now mostly used as a noun in financial and legal documents to refer to something that is offered as security that an action will occur.

Edited by AdamK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the REALLY not important Dept.: Guaranty is not wrong - just obsolete.

 

 

http://grammarist.com/usage/guarantee-vs-guaranty/

 

Guaranty is an obsolete form of the word guarantee, it is now mostly used as a noun in financial and legal documents to refer to something that is offered as security that an action will occur.

 

As its says, it is used as a noun - which is the way I used it. I also am an attorney and, as your reference states, it is used in legal documents.

 

Hardly an oooof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...