Deranged Rhino Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1301992814952284162 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I wish I knew what these motions meant in practical terms. Will this be over soon? Can Sullivan drag it out until November 4th? If Gleason also has agreed to file his brief by the 11th, is this done on September 11th? Edited September 5, 2020 by Buffalo_Gal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: I wish I knew what these motions meant in practice terms. Will this be over soon? Can Sullivan drag it out until November 4th? I think he can as he is in charge of scheduling, but there’s no good reason for him to do so now that Flynn won’t be fighting the motion on the 11th. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 27 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I think he can as he is in charge of scheduling, but there’s no good reason for him to do so now that Flynn won’t be fighting the motion on the 11th. Haven't seen a "good reason" for Sullivan's actions since the DoJ tried to drop the case. Have no reason at all to expect this won't drag out past the election. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 13 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: ...."thanks Emmett...your weekly stipend is in the mail"...... Best Regards, Nancy 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 Still won't keep you out of the clink, Pete. (And FBI agents do VERY well in federal prison) 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Still won't keep you out of the clink, Pete. (And FBI agents do VERY well in federal prison) LOL...."Pistol Pete"......just like his late namesake...."all hype and missed on tons of open shots"........ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted September 6, 2020 Share Posted September 6, 2020 44 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Still won't keep you out of the clink, Pete. (And FBI agents do VERY well in federal prison) Please tell me Strzok’s middle initial is O. I can’t think of a better set of initials for this guy than POS. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 8, 2020 Share Posted September 8, 2020 Vindman, Not Whistleblower, Was Driving Force Behind Impeachment by Mollie Hemingway Original Article The most interesting thing about Byron York’s exhaustively reported and richly detailed new impeachment book, “Obsession: Inside the Washington Establishment’s Never-Ending War on Trump,” is that the whistleblower who filed the official complaint that got impeachment rolling isn’t ever identified. (Snip) the heated discussion over the whistleblower, who was previously identified by Real Clear Investigations as the CIA’s Eric Ciaramella, was a diversion from allowing the American people to understand who was the actual instigator of the failed effort to oust President Donald Trump from office. Rather than being a witness who independently supported the claims of the whistleblower, the National Security Council’s Lt. Col Alex Vindman was the driving force behind 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 11, 2020 Share Posted September 11, 2020 Supposedly Reliable Steele Acted 'Crazy,' His FBI Handler Says: 'People's Ears Were Bleeding.' </snip> “Crazy” was the term the FBI agent used to describe the behavior of Christopher Steele, author of the now-debunked Trump-Russia dossier. “I've seen crazy source-related stuff in 20 years in New York and this was one of the craziest," the veteran agent testified to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. </snip> The previously unreported testimony of FBI agent Michael Gaeta is found on page 900 of the fifth and final volume of the Senate committee’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election. It raises new questions about the basis of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign, Crossfire Hurricane, and the declarations it made to the FISA court in four separate applications submitted to spy on American citizens. </snip> The willingness of the assistant director for counterintelligence to misrepresent essential information is important because it was Priestap who was responsible for the official launch of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation in the first place. Gaeta explained to senators just how serious and irrevocable a break it was to “close” a source: ''Once he's closed, nobody is allowed – we can't talk to him.” In this case, that practice was not followed. Priestap’s apparent rationale was that the decision to close Steele as a source was not made because he offered unfounded claims but because he had violated confidentiality agreements by sharing them with the press. And so, the FBI continued to gather new “reporting” by Steele. One of channels was David Corn, the Mother Jones reporter who had written the article about Steele’s accusations. Corn was a longtime friend of then-FBI General Counsel James Baker. Their children had gone to the same school years before and carpooled. Corn gave Steele memos to Baker and then Baker passed them on to Priestap. Thus the strange situation in which an assistant director of the FBI forbade agents from talking to Steele because of the source’s indiscretion with Mother Jones and then proceeded to gather Steele materials through a back-channel relationship with Mother Jones. </snip> 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted September 11, 2020 Share Posted September 11, 2020 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER DOT COM Posted September 11, 2020 Share Posted September 11, 2020 2 minutes ago, Hedge said: FLYNNDICATED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 11, 2020 Share Posted September 11, 2020 There's really nothing left you can defend about Mueller or the probe itself -- unless you're either a fan of seditious conspiracies designed to disenfranchise the American People, or completely ignorant of the facts. It's pretty easy to tell who's who based on their posts in this thread * The investigators knew before Mueller took the job that there was no collusion, conspiracy, or crimes committed by Trump or his team (fact) * The investigators ignored this knowledge and created a probe designed to be an obstruction/perjury trap designed to allow the media to run rampant with speculation * The investigators routinely leaked false information to the media behind the protection of "anonymous sources" in order to gaslight the country * The investigation was used to interfere in the 2018 midterms -- which is ironic considering the purported reason for the probe in the first place * The end result of the investigation was a complete vindication of Trump's election victory -- and a complete repudiation of the establishment powers behind the probe Scoreboard: 0 Trump officials indicted or charged for crimes involving the 2016 election, Russia, or collusion. 1 SCO/FBI team member pleaded guilty to falsifying evidence against Trump. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts