Jump to content

DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal


Recommended Posts

Just now, bdutton said:

No... what is un-american us using unverified dirty report funded by political opposition to get a FISA warrant to spy on a political campaign.

That's just Trump spin. If our election is under attack the FBI has a duty to protect us. You obviously don't think so. 

 

 

I'm going to go get a cheeseburger, anyone want something? Coffee? Fries, anything? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I thought the setup was brilliant on Barr's part. Explain what happened factually, leave a bit of wriggle room for a partisan journo to imply Barr was working on behalf of the president, and journo implying Barr was dirty....then telling her the narrative actually came from Mueller report.

 

Masterfully done.   

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That's just Trump spin. If our election is under attack the FBI has a duty to protect us. You obviously don't think so. 

 

 

I'm going to go get a cheeseburger, anyone want something? Coffee? Fries, anything? 

Thanks but no thanks. I wouldn't want to depend on you for anything but your lies. That's the one thing you are really good at, delivering lies. You're like a five-star lie delivery company. You are one of a kind. Liar of liars. Chief of falsehoods and deceiver of others. You've found your niche.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

And the left has turned on RR :lol: 

 

Jesus, they can't keep their narrative straight.

 

How dare he not recuse himself!  He should have been fired for that...

 

(How dare Trump fire him!  Obstruction!)

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

 

In an executive summary, Mueller’s team clearly stated that it did not believe “collusion”—which Trump has incessantly insisted he did not commit—to be a legal term. For that reason, prosecutors did not assess whether Trump’s campaign “colluded” with Russia.

“In evaluation whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of ‘collusion,’” prosecutors wrote. They noted that the Department of Justice had at times used the word “collusion” prior to Mueller’s appointment. “But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law.”

They said they instead examined whether anyone associated with the Trump campaign “coordinated” with Russians, as defined by conspiracy law. “We understood coordination to require an agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference.”

They noted that an agreement requires two parties taking actions “informed by or responsive to the other’s actions or interests.”

Using that definition, they wrote, the investigation “did not establish” that the Trump campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference.

(From page 2 of the report)

— Rosalind S. Helderman

 

 

Are you f'n kidding me! 

 

In a heavily redacted section of the special counsel’s report, Mueller writes that, “The Trump Campaign showed interest in Wikileaks’ releases of hacked materials throughout the summer and fall of 2016.”

The subsequent pages mention several key Trump associates, including Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen and Rick Gates. But most the details are redacted under the heading of “Harm to Ongoing Matter.

According to former Trump campaign adviser Gates, then campaign manager Manafort “expressed excitement about the release” of stolen DNC emails by WikiLeaks in the summer of 2016. Manafort told the special counsel that, shortly after the July 22 release, Manafort also spoke with Trump. Manafort wanted to be kept apprised of developments,and separately told Gates to keep in touch about future WikiLeaks releases.

The pages also mention the activities of WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange, but again this section features heavy redactions.

Another line in this section says, “Candidate Trump told Gates that more releases of damaging information would be coming.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Another line in this section says, “Candidate Trump told Gates that more releases of damaging information would be coming.”

 
  •  

Any damaging info on a political candidate is fair game, it's been going on forever

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

That's just Trump spin. If our election is under attack the FBI has a duty to protect us. You obviously don't think so. 

 

 

I'm going to go get a cheeseburger, anyone want something? Coffee? Fries, anything? 

giphy.gif

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So... walk that logic out. The same special counsel who found the Page information contained in the dossier was false, the pee tape was false, the cohen in prague story was false, the Trump/Cohen coordinated the hacking of the DNC was false... that same special counsel who found all those things that prove the dossier to be bunk ALSO said Trump pointing that out was obstruction. 

 

Weissman is a classy guy. 

More nonsense: 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...